The horizon is not so far as we can see, but as far as we can imagine

Category: health care Page 27 of 35

The 90/10 rule as applied to medical practitioners

I’ve spent a lot of my life sick, and a fair bit injured.  In my twenties I spent 3 months in the hospital all in one go.  When I left I weighed 90 lbs and could barely walk.  (Full details here.)  I’d had back issues in hospital (sacroiliac joint) and about 6 months later, I picked up some boxes and moved them about 50 feet.  No big deal.  Went to bed, woke up next morning, and the least movement would cause my lower left back to clench in the most excruciating way.  It wound up that the fire department had to break down the door to my room (I was living in a moderately unpleasant rooming house), sheet pull me and take me to the hospital.

Over the next six months I saw plenty of doctors.  One thought I was faking (and to this day I hate him with a blinding passion—I could barely walk, couldn’t sit down, couldn’t get out of bed without excruciating pain), the others gave me a variety of anti-inflammatories and muscle relaxants, none of which had an noticeable effect.  Finally I found a doctor who wasn’t paranoid about pain killers and at least gave me a prescrition: she was 7 months pregnant.

I was amused, but not happy.

Over time it fixed itself.  After about 6 months I could get out of bed, bend over, sit down, put on shoes, etc… without the expectation of major pain.  Still inadvisable to do any manual labor, but I did some, because I needed the money, and I paid for that money with agony.

After a few years, it resolved itself.

About three weeks ago, the day after a heavy lower back workout in the gym, I was out for a walk.  Stepped off a curb, twisting slightly as I did, and felt the left lower back go: felt it clench up agonizingly, and my left leg lost almost all its strength.  I dropped into a squat with my feet together, to take pressure off my back, steadying myself against a lamp-post.  Gingerly stood up.  Found that I could barely walk, but that I could barely walk.  Found that the least jostle or bump would cause the muscle to clench agonizingly.

I was about half way to the local farmer’s market.  Because I’m cussed I walked the rest of the way, then walked home.  That night I went to bed with codeine, a phone, and a book next to my bed, in case I couldn’t get out of it.

I could, but it was a long and painful operation.

I suffered for about a week, then I had an appointment with my naturopathic doctor.  He said, “I have no idea what’s wrong, I want you to see this sports therapist.”

Next day I walked in to see that sport’s therapist, who has worked for multiple professional teams.  Within 5 minutes of meeting me, he said, “the muscle in your lower back which attaches to your lower spine on the left side is in spasm, protecting your spine’s curve.”

A diagnosis!  I went to a pile of doctors in the 90s—not one of the diagnosed what was wrong with me.  Not one of them sent me to a physiotherapist, sport’s therapist, chiropractor or even a decent massage therapist.  (And one of those doctors was a rheumatologist.)

The sports therpaist does some massage, using elector-accupuncture to try and tire out the muscle so it’ll relax so that magnesium can get into it so it can relax more.

Minor results: I felet a bit better.  Second session didn’t seem to do anything.

So I lookedup a chiropractor, searching online till I found one who seems to deal with such problems and sounds competent.  Dr. Kevin Ho.  I go in, he looks me over, he tells me my hips are misaligned, so the muscle is, in part, in spasm to protect the spine from my right hip pulling it out of alignment.

He goes to work, tells me to see the sport therapist to wear out the muscle: next day I don’t feel much better. I go see the sport’s therapist, he does his thing.

The next day (today) I feel vastly better.  I can put on shoes and pants and underwear without the expectation of agony!  I go see the Chriopractor again, I ask him how much of the hip alignment he had corrected in the first session.

“Oh, about 50%, but you’ve lost 15% since then.”

Now this is interesting to me, because some time ago I saw a chiropractor regularly, for about a year.  In that year, I do not recall him making as much progress as Dr. Ho has made in, oh, one session.

He works away, by the time I leave, I can bend over more than twice as far as when I came in.

Now what’s interesting to me about this (other than not being in so much pain, which is of great interest to me, but probably much less to you) is that these guys, between them, appear to have diagnosed what is happening and why, and gone a long way to fixing it when a pile of doctors before couldn’t even diagnose it, let alone fix it!

(And I left out the massage therapist on Sunday who made it worse.)

But this does accord with my experience with doctors:  most doctors are mediocre. They do what they do, which is hand out prescriptions for a few problems they see regularly, they are horrible diagnosticians, and they do not care.  As with most people working in any field, about 9 out of every 10 is a drone, barely competent, doing the bare minimum not to be charged with malpractice.

About 1 in 10 is actually good, knows what they are doing, and doesn’t work by rote, but can actually diagnose and fix problems.

(And about 1 in ten of the good ones is more than good, is brilliant.)

This seems to be true of healthcare practitioners in general.  Over the last few years I’ve had maybe two dozen massages.  One of those massage therapists was brilliant, a couple were good, and that’s it.  The brilliant one was taught by her father, a blacksmith, and at age 50, as part of her two hour fitness routine, started with 20 pull ups (most marines in their 20s can’t do 20 pullups.)  If you had, say, a headache, when you left it was almost gone and two hours later it was gone completely: guaranteed.  She regarded your problems as a personal affront to be healed.

When I was young, to me a doctor was an M.D., and if I needed to see someone else, I figured the M.D. would refer me.  As I’ve aged I’ve learned that for body mechanics issues most M.D.s are worthless, and that most physical therapists are mediocre, but the good ones are amazing. I’ve learned that, in fact, alternative medicine often  has the people who can actually make you feel better, but that most of them are mediocre too.  I’ve learned that if you want a doctor to actually sit down and listen to your symptoms and history, you’re going to have to pay for that out of pocket, even in Canada.  Traditional Chinese Medicine is FAR better for something like Eczema than anything western Medicine has, and so on.

We have, for one thing, too few doctors right now.  They are actively scared of seriously sick people, because they have to push you out the door in fifteen minutes.  This is supply and demand, we need to have more doctors, they will also cost less.  We have systematically chosen doctors for their cold manner for decades, because people who cared would “burn out”.  Going to a TCM doctor from China was a shock to me, he looked at my skin and made what sounded like genuine sounds of sympathy: he seemed to understand it was painful, and care, in a warm, human way. I can think of maybe two M.D.s who have ever given me that feeling.

The Skeptics movement are a bunch of authority worshipers.  A lot of alternative medicine does work, and they do not apply their own skepticism to standard medicine: where if you get all the studies for many medicines you discover they are little better than active placebos in many cases, only work for a minority of the population when they do work, and have nasty side effects besides.  For many illnesses regularly treated with powerful neuro-active drugs, exercise is as effective, or more, and does no harm, besides.  We should be prescribing a lot more exercise, for those who can stand it, and a lot less drugs, and we should be looking at drug trial results with a great deal more skepticism because many of them are badly designed and the ones which fail are generally not released to the public.

We should also be doing far more research into why some drugs are very effective only for a minority of people with the condition.  What are the markers that determine such effectiveness?  And we should be completely cleaning up our food system, because the reason we have so much illness is bad diet and no exercise in far too many cases (plus various forms of pollution.)  Healthy food costs more, but we are subsidizing unhealthy food, and paying for it on the back end with illness and the costs of illness.

But to bring it back to the first point: most healthcare practitioners are borderline competent, and only a small minority are actually good.  Throughout my life I’ve seen that this is the case.  When you’re looking for a competent one, look for one of two things:

1) someone who takes your disease or injury as a personal affront, to be defeated at all costs, because Goddamn It, no fucking disease is going to beat them; or,

2) someone who manifestly cares and wants you to be better, because they hate seeing you suffer.

Absent caring in one of these two ways, very few healthcare practitioners are any good.  They fall quickly into a rut, giving out prescriptions or doing treatments just to get through patients, through the day, and back home.

If your doctor or therapist doesn’t care, either about you or their own pride, get the hell away from them.

The Obamacare Fiasco

I think Schadenfraude nicely sums up what I’m feeling about Obama’s troubles with his signature health care bill, though I do feel  sorry for people who are being hurt by Obamacare.

It’s not the website that is killing Obama, of course, it’s the cancellation of pre-existing policies (though the website is an unforced mistake).  Obama told people they could keep their policies, but that decision was never his to make, it was up to insurance companies.  Since there is no robust public option, Obama does not have any significant leverage over the insurance companies, there is nothing he can do to them, so why shouldn’t they do what is in their best interest?

Please don’t say something like “because that would hurt people” because I’d laugh so hard I might rupture something.  Insurance companies are run by evil people as a class, and they make their money, not by providing care but by denying it.  The more care they deny, the more money they make.  One of my friends once designed medical “interest free” loans for people who needed life-saving operations.  Sounds like a deal, doesn’t it?  Of course, that’s zero interest on list price, not on what the insurance company was paying.  The company was making a hundred to two hundred percent profit per policy. Nice business to be in, if you have no soul.

When you are dealing with bad people, you must assume bad faith; bad behavior.  You must plan for it.  The best option was always Medicare-for-all (and I was told by at least one House staffer that they could pass it if they really wanted to and were willing to go nuclear.)  The problem with Obama has always been this sickening need to be one of the boys.  He appears to genuinely like and genuinely admire the people who have “made it” in this society—people like Jamie Dimon and the people who run insurance  and drug companies.  He thinks you can make deals with these people, and make sure everyone wins.

You can’t.  These people are the most successful parasites ever produced by our nasty form of sociopathic capitalism.  You can only give them what they want or you can rip them from the body politic, so they stop sucking the blood from the host they’re killing.

So the insurance companies have bitten the hand that fed them.  Obama gave them everything they wanted and made sure nothing of importance they didn’t want (like a public option) was in the bill. Now they’re chomping and chewing, destroying what remains of his presidency.

He has reaped as he sowed.

This is going to get worse.  As Corrente has repeatedly pointed out, the provider networks on the low cost plans are extremely thin.  People are going to find out that they’re only covered in theory, that there is no hospital that treats their type of cancer anywhere near them, for example.  They’re going to find out that they’re paying for coverage they cannot, in effect, use, for any number of reasons.  Drug costs will continue to rise, as well, since Obama carefully made sure all methods of reducing them were made illegal.

Obamacare was, and is, a subsidy.  A way of keeping the insurance companies going; of keeping the current healthcare system going.  The good, gold-plated private insurance plans, unless you’re an executive, are pretty much gone. As such everyone had to be forced to buy a shitty private insurance plan.  It will definitely help some people, some people will win, but many people will lose.

I will point out, for what feels like the millionth time, that simply putting everyone on Medicare would have been less expensive per person and produced better outcomes.  Even a robust public option would have given Obama leverage, because the insurance companies would have been scared everyone would migrate over to it, and so would have needed to treat people well.

But this… this is the worst of all worlds, and that is how it was designed to be.

It’s unclear to me how much of this is corruption (rest assured, Obama, like Clinton, will make tens of millions miraculously quickly on leaving office) and how much is some pathological need to be one of the boys, but I am clear that this failure is the inevitable product of how Obamacare was designed.

(CORRECTED) If the Republican Bill were to Pass…

Correction: I misread the bill, while the part about the individual mandate is correct, legislators were already going to be forced into the exchanges.  What the bill does is cut staffer subsidies, and most of those staffers are poor.  That’s not something I can support.

 

legislators would have to get their health care coverage from ACA exchanges like other Americans, and the individual mandate would be pushed back one year.  (Remember, the corporate mandate has been pushed backed, it’s only individuals being forced to buy or pay a fine.)

Who is on the wrong side here?  The exchanges would still open, those who would benefit from the ACA could still buy insurance and legislators would have the same experience as Americans instead of gold-plated healthcare.

If President Romney had passed this bill (and remember, it is Romneycare on a national scale), and Democrats were shutting down the government with the exact same bill, most people screaming about this would be justifying it.

The Individual Mandate and the Government Shutdown

Let’s get specific.  The House spending bill linked continued funding to a one year delay of the individual mandate—the requirement that everyone buy insurance.  This is not the same thing as delaying Obamacare, everyone who wanted a policy could still buy one.  While there are subsidies for buying insurance, for many of the working poor they don’t cover most of the cost, and the insurance they buy is very high deductible, meaning that they are forced to either pay a fine, or buy insurance that they can’t afford to use.

Straight up the individual mandate is a transfer of  money from the working poor and the young and healthy to insurance companies and older sicker individuals. It forces people who can’t afford an extra expense every month (and if you have never lived paycheck to paycheck you should shut your mouth, you have no idea what it’s like) to buy something they can’t afford: to choose between food or rent or insurance.

On the face of it, and leaving aside motives, I cannot see that the Republican bill was a bad thing.  Absent a real, robust public option and much stronger subsidies than exist, the individual mandate was always the most odious part of the ACA.  This is not to argue that Obamacare does not do some good, it will save some people’s lives and reduce other people’s suffering. But it does so explicitly by hurting some of the most vulnerable people in America: the price of your healthcare, if it’s helping you, is hurting other, vulnerable, people.

I note, also, that employers were given a delay on their mandate, but individuals: poor people, were not given an extension on theirs.

Let us speak, next, to the details of the shutdown: if you do not like that most of the NSA, say, is still operational, but food and airline safety inspectors are furloughed, that is a decision made by the executive. It exactly reflects Obama’s priorities, it is not a decision made by Republicans.  You can blame Republicans for the shutdown, you cannot blame them for the specifics of how it is carried out, that is entirely Obama’s decision.  Spying on Americans and killing brown people with drones is vastly important to Obama and always has been.  Making sure you don’t die of e-coli, apparently not so much.

The individual mandate, from every poll I can find, is the most unpopular part of the ACA, opposed by straight majorities of Americans and definitely opposed by the Republicans who elected the Representatives who voted to delay it.  This is not a case of Democracy not working, it is a case of Democracy working.  What one House does, another can undo, that is the essence of democratic change.

To point out the obvious on today’s Supreme Court Decision on the ACA

Roberts voted how he did because health insurance companies are absolutely desperate for the money they will get from the mandate.  All of the legitimacy arguments are bullshit, about 70% of Americans opposed the mandate.(pdf)  This is more similar to TARP than anything else: it is a massive corporate giveaway, opposed by the majority of the population, and passed over their dissent.

Watching so-called progressives shilling for forcing people to buy shitty insurance to subsidize health insurance companies has been another example of why I don’t call myself a progressive.  Yes, a few people’s lives will be saved.  The cost will be many lives destroyed.

Update: to make the other obvious point, that government can force people to buy largely unregulated corporate products is an important precedent for the oligarchy.

Update 2: to point out more obvious which apparently isn’t:

  • Roberts struck down Medicaid expansion, which means he closed the hole to creeping single payer
  • the ACA is a subsidy from the young and healthy to the old and unhealthy.
  • The subsidies to help buy insurance (which are insufficient to begin with) will nonetheless quickly become one of the biggest budget items, and will be taken away in the future.

Change: Changed from 70% oppose Obamacare to 70% oppose the mandate, link added.  The mandate is what progressives wanted upheld.  Note the deafening silence on the fact that medicaid has been screwed—the part that helps the poor most.

Is the individual mandate really the hill progressives want to die on?

Really?

The individual mandate is lousy policy.  It always was.  It is especially lousy policy without a large (100 million +) public option.  The health care plan is, for all intents and purposes, a 90’s Heritage plan.

This?  This is what progressives want to fight for?

BMaz has a good article up on whether the bill is Constitutional.  Me, I don’t know if it’s Constitutional.  But what I do know is that if I were a conservative Justice, I’d want to just strike down the individual mandate and leave the rest in place, because I would laugh myself sick every night watching Obama have to kill the bill himself, getting rid of guaranteed issue, community ratings, and so on.  Because Obama would have to, and would.  He made a deal with the health insurance companies.  In exchange for some concessions, what they received in exchange was every American being forced to buy their shitty product.  And while Obama doesn’t keep promises to left wingers, he does keep promises to people like the CEOs of health insurance companies.

Still, watching “progressives” defending the individual mandate is just another reminder of why I don’t call myself a progressive.

Go and die on a hill, for forcing Americans to buy shitty insurance from evil companies which aren’t properly regulated.

I’ll just sit here on the sidelines laughing myself sick.  With progressives like these, who needs right wingers?

What the Debt Limit Crisis Should Have Taught You

This is not primarily about the Tea Party

It is about what rich donors want.  The Tea Party does not even have the amount of muscle progressives do.  Progressives can bring tens of thousands of people out, the Tea Party can rarely even get above 1,000.  They are a convenient excuse to do what the Beltway and the oligarchs already want to do.

Where are you going to go?

Both Dems and Republicans are onside with cutting Social Security and Medicare. They are only third rails if there is someone else to vote for.

The deals being offered will cause a second downleg of the Depression and a worse one

We’re in a Depression.  This is fact.  Anyone who doesn’t call it that is gutless, stupid or uninformed.  This will make it worse, not just for the US, but for the entire developed world.

Representatives work for the people who pay them

That isn’t really you.  They don’t become multi-millionaires on their salaries, you know.  It’s their donors, the people who hire their wives and children, the people who fund their campaigns, the people who give them good jobs when they leave government.  If you want Reps and Senators to work for you, you must pay them better, you must fund their campaigns (and sharply limit outside funding) and you must make it illegal for them to EVER make more money in a year than their government salary (index it to an average of the median wage, the minimum wage, and CPI).  You should do what Canada used to do and give them a good pension after 6 years.  You DON’T want them worrying about their next job, or what they’ll do if they’ll lose.

Point being, they don’t work for you.

This is a representative plutocracy

I believe Stirling Newberry, in the early 90s, pointed this out first.  Politicians are paid by people other than you.  You are the product.  Think of this as the Facebook rule, if you aren’t paying for something, then you are the product.  The rich pay politicians to rangle you.  The amount of salary and public funding most Reps get is trivial compared to how much money they get from donors, even during their time in elected office, let alone after they leave.  You are the product, not the customer, of DC politicians.  They do not represent you, and you should not expect your interests to be looked after except as an afterthought.  When the oligarchs all agree that something needs to be done (like cut entitlements), it will be done, no matter how unpopular it is.

This “Crisis” is what Obama wanted

Again, if he didn’t, he would have raised the debt ceiling in the lame duck.  Nancy Pelosi was always very good at getting those sort of basic housekeeping bills through. It would have passed.  Period.  Obama wanted to cut SS and Medicare, and he needed a “crisis” in order to do it.  He also needed a Republican House, which he had, because his policies during 2009 and 2010 didn’t fix the economy.

You should have been working on nothing but primarying Obama since the day after the midterms

If you don’t understand why, I can’t help you.

There is no war but class war

Break the rich, or they will finish institutionalizing aristocracy.  Period.

The Psychiatric Drug Industry

The New York Review of Books looks into the question of why there is an epidemic of mental illness, and if the drugs used to treat problems like depression actually work.

Short answer, no, the evidence for the drugs working is exceptionally weak.

Longer answer, the drugs mess with the patient’s brains, and in the longer term they make their condition worse.  The brain tries to neutralize the extra neurotransmitter, or to produce more of the suppressed neurotransmitter, but it eventually fails and burns out, creating what appears to be close to permanent damage (the brain is remarkably plastic so I hesitate to say it lasts forever, but Whitaker’s book, which I have read, includes evidence that even years don’t repair the damage.)

To put it simply, the psychiatric establishment has been corrupted by the pharmaceutical industry.  Shrinks, as a group, remind me of economists, most of them are frauds who follow an orthodoxy they never examine properly, highly credentialed fools who do more damage than good, prescribing medicine based on theories which have never been shown to match reality, or work.

Page 27 of 35

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén