TL;DR: China facilitated a ceasefire based largely on Iranian terms. Iran made concessions. Then Trump accepted the gains and reneged.
China urged Iran to show flexibility, but the ceasefire was negotiated on Iran’s 10-point plan, NOT Trump’s 15-point “capitulation” demand. Under Iran’s framework, Tehran was supposed to retain control of the strait and continue collecting transit fees under that framework:
• China urged Iran to “show flexibility” and accept the ceasefire framework. Reports say that China “intervened at the last minute and strongly urged Iran to accept the negotiations”.
* Trump himself hinted at Beijing’s involvement, telling reporters “I hear yes” when asked if China pressured Tehran to negotiate.
China vetoed the US-backed UN resolution on Hormuz, i.e., refusing to give Washington a diplomatic blank check or leverage that could used in the negotiation:
• The ceasefire was negotiated on Iran’s terms, not Trump’s. Tehran’s 10-point plan became the framework, while Trump’s 15-point plan for “Iranian capitulation” was set aside.
• Iran was supposed to retained control of the strait and continued collecting transit fees during the truce. Trump publicly acknowledged this as “workable”.
As expected: immediately after Iran had lifted its blockade and closure of Strait of Hormuz as agreed, Trump broke the agreement. He pocketed the concessions from Iran, reneged on the deal’s core premise, and then demand more.
From the moment Iran reopened the strait on April 17, only for Trump to immediately refuse to lift his blockade, a tidal wave of outrage over being “tricked” swept across Chinese social — and, more importantly, state — media: Trump exploited China’s good-faith intervention to extract an Iranian concession, then immediately used the Beijing-brokered ceasefire against China.
i.e., Trump stabbed China in the back immediately after China helped him in negotiating a ceasefire.
This is straight from Trump’s “Darth Vader” negotiating-style playbook: “”I am altering the deal, pray I don’t alter it any further.”
1. First, he demanded China to pressure Iran. Beijing showed good faith, and Iran opened the strait.
2. Then, he kept the US blockade anyway. Trump’s Truth Social announcement made it explicit: Iran’s reopening was welcomed, but the blockade “will remain in full force and effect as it pertains to Iran, only”.
3. He framed this as a favor to China. Trump told reporters, “China is very happy that I am permanently opening the Strait of Hormuz” — while the US Navy continued to choke Iranian oil exports that China depends on, which IMO Trump intended to use as a pressure-point leverage against Xi in his upcoming visit and negotiation in Beijing.
4. Iran sees it as a violation — and so do Chinese on the social and state media, and IMO many in Chinese leadership must also see it the same way. Tehran said the US had “repeatedly violating trust” and has reimposed closure on the Strait of Hormuz.
Trump got China to pressure Iran, Iran opened the strait, and then Trump kept the blockade anyway — stabbing China in the back while claiming he was doing China a favor.
P.S. Iran has done China a huge favor by reimposing its blockade of Hormuz, after China had foolishly persuaded (or pressured) Iran into accepting the ceasefire that ended up being essentially a US blockade and leverage against China. I hope China will remember who is the real enemy, backstabber, and villain — and who is the real friend who has honor and China’s back.
Mostly solid takes from KT Chong, but I will quibble on a few bits. In the earlier Hormuz thread, spud (pretty much always brilliant, very long posts) made the point that China is High on supplying goods to the economically broken West. Someone else covered this, John Helmer I think, recently; China sells drone technology to the West just as Russia sells energy to the West, and those resources are then used to– attack China and Russia!
Globalist economics is insane, and leadership across the globe plays along.
Listening to Mercouris at the moment, he made some good points which dampen the gloom on my just prior take on the Hormuz events. First he noted that Trump being the insecure sissy little girl (my words, he is much too polite) he is, once the strait was very briefly opened had to crybully brag that he’d WON and his all-powerful “Blockade of a Blockade” was locked in, if only to reassure his fragile baby ego that he never loses, and spread that to the world. The outcome: Scott Besant, who had JUST said all the Russian and Iranian oil would be sanctioned, then had to immediately unsanction it!! Unintended consequences. Additionally he pointed out that the Indian ship trying to exit that got hit with Iran’s fire turned back, doing the wise thing.
Never doubt the “freaks, alcoholics, and losers” of Trumpland’s ability to screw their own pooch and fuck up their most devious plans is a pretty clear lesson.
Oh, and Starmer’s tottering, lying that he didn’t know about his gay bff Lord Peter Mandelson’s warm relationship and trading British economic secrets directly to Epstein, nobody believes him. Mandelson had already “failed his vetting,” gave LPM a laudatory tongue bath while promoting him. George Galloway claimed that Starmer’s court battle with the 3 Ukrainian Rent Boys who knew about his cars, extra houses, etc. and torched them for something he did (pay denied? a venereal disease?) is impending.
Seems quite a sideshow. I do have to wonder: Will Maduro ever have his day in a New York Court? Will “Sir” Keir get his gay sexploits revealed in the British courts? And will Brigitte Macron EVER wrap up her lawsuit contra Candace Owens claiming Brigitte doesn’t have a penis. (She sure beats up the Mister, who “she” seduced when he was 15, old enough to be his dad/mom. Not just the cameras catching the savage face-slap when he was debarking from the plane, but later at the Berlin War Security Conference, he had to wear dark shades to cover the blackened eye(s.)
Which just goes to show Mark Level, that kinks and pervs rule. Pass the eyeliner and falsies.
Speaking of the Kinks, Ray Davies did the Lola song back in 1970 when the trans thing was big in England. He was being tongue in cheek sardonic, not endorsing, but of course that passed beneath the radar of the trans crowd and radio DJ’s alike.
We live in a delusional world of illusion. There’s nothing to say there’s nothing to do it’s up to you . . . good morning, good morning, good morning
The ChinaGov and the IranGov both probably expected Trump to reward flexibility with treachery. But there is also a public opinion brainwar going along with the physical force-war on the ground and the water. When Trump is seen to reward flexibility with treachery, this make Iran look better and the US look worse.
Iran will win the brainwar as well as the ground and water power war and outcomes war.
China was foolish to have pressured Iran, but China simply hopes to be able to sell things and make money and wants this war to just go away as it gets in the way of selling things and making money.
The Americans and Israelis, by contrast, are only interested in power, domination and control. If they have to crash the world economy to maintain power, then they’ll do it without a second thought.
Needless to say, the Americans see any peace feelers as capitulation, and they are getting ready to take another swing.
@mark level:
“Oh, and Starmer’s tottering, lying that he didn’t know about his gay bff Lord Peter Mandelson’s warm relationship and trading British economic secrets directly to Epstein, nobody believes him.”
Of course everyone knows Starmer is lying, but what does it matter? As long as there is a non-zero chance that his replacement will be someone unacceptable to the british establishment, they’ll smirk and pretend to go along with it.
“Mandelson had already ‘failed his vetting,’ gave LPM a laudatory tongue bath while promoting him. ”
Mandelson was acceptable to the british establishment and most importantly, to the Americans.
Remember, the british political class has no priority other than the War On Russia, namely getting Americans to fight that war for them.
If they have to crash the world economy to maintain power, then they’ll do it without a second thought
Because the Israeli economy is propped up by US largesse, it won’t suffer. And average USians suffering isn’t a concern for the Trumpists who will manipulate the markets to their advantage but to the detriment to the savings of ordinary Americans, cause a recession/depression to the detriment of ordinary Americans, while slashing healthcare and services for ordinary Americans.
This children, is what happens when “empathy” becomes a dirty word and a weakness. “Hey, If I’m ok, why care about you? I’ve got mine.” That rot set in a long time ago.
Been traveling through Southeast Asia, with an international contingent. I caught a case of a crud (probably a virus).
Observations:
I’ve not been terribly impressed with Thailand, but it has nothing at all to do with the Thai people, their food, or their culture. What I don’t like about Thailand is (admittedly) in the cities I’ve been is overwhelming number of drunken, boorish, rude, tourists (usually Western, but also Middle Eastern and some South Asian). Thailand is the country where Westerners come to act badly, even “colonial”, if you catch the meaning. It’s party-zone for these.
I was there during the Songkran festival, where I got sick. Songkran (a Thai New Year celebration) involves big water gun fights between participants. But these water gun fights have rules: you’re not supposed to splash any non-participant, especially the old, those carrying infants, monks, motorcycle drivers (have caused accidents) or anyone with property that could be damaged. Simply raising your hands as to say “not me” is good enough to avoid getting deliberately splashed….for Thai people that is. Shooting someone who’s “protected” is actually a violation codified in Thai law.
But the Westerners might shoot anyone and everyone — “Lookie, I’m making that person miserable” -yuk yuk yuk. Protest and say “no” they’ll shoot you harder. It happened to me, from a bunch of drunks sitting in open-air German bar. What I’ve read in the comments is that the water gun stuff used to be just for Thai children, but then “we” took it over. Now Songkran has fatalities–95 this year, at last count.
This was the most irksome feature this year, but in my non-Songkran visits it’s just the proliferation of everything non-Thai, everything “for the Western tourist” — the food offerings, the massage parlors (some say “no sex”, so I guess if there’s no such sign there IS sex?) It’s just a place for Westerners to act badly.
By contrast, Vietnam is sweet. I’ve been staying in an apartment complex on the east side, and every day I went out I’d see simple everyday life—parents carrying babies and/or small children, old people chatting on park benches, students doing studies at the coffee shops, and more. The other day me and a Russian friend helped a mother with two babies in strollers up some steps. You open doors for old people or people carrying packages and stuff. Vietnam has is entertainment, true, but it (and Taiwan) is “entertainment for us”, though foreigners are welcome to join if they want. It’s not just “entertainment for Western tourists”.
The other thing in my travels here is I’m seeing both the tyranny of AI and of our financial system. Gawd save us from biometrics! I’ve seen too-many instances of failure to recognize faces or thumbprints, and too-many web pages where I have accounts think I’m a hacker (I couldn’t check my auto insurance to see if it was paid, for example). Transferring and getting money is getting harder too. Of course, all this is happening because the people who suffer from this failure aren’t the ones implementing it. I’d prefer we stayed with passwords; just make them strong.
If the real war is class war, then the long-expected, mysteriously delayed U.S. financial crash will have interesting features and benefits embedded.
“Hostile symbiosis” identifies the China / U.S. economic and geopolitical relationship, in which China depends for its own stability on keeping the parasitized zombie U.S. staggering forward, even as the U.S. flails abroad and sinks into depression domestically.
“Weaponized incompetence” is the standard of policymaking and personnel selection underlying U.S. and European partisan politics. Leadership selection is replaced by systematic deselection as corruption, expectations of corruption and virtual and actual assassination short-circuit any possibility of political reform. AI slop feeds Tiktok and X, which in turn fries the doom-scrolling American mind.
if the world has not figured it out by now, then they are hopeless, and will get picked off one at a time.
the dayton accords should have been their awakening. north korea understood it, no one else did.
your not negotiating with the american government, you are in reality, negotiating with the rich.
Soros wanted that lithium mine really bad in yugoslavia, and plane loads of parasites were being flown in to see what they could steal with ease.
the dayton accords were take it or leave it, no real negotiations.
so why are the big three, russia, china, and iran still thinking they can negotiate with parasites?
its that sugar high from trade. as others have mentioned.
if FDR had not seen the lesson that was occurring from russia’s pounding of the japanese in 1938, he would have worried about trade instead of cutting the japanese off.
once japan lost that dream of taking siberia away from russia, everyone without blinders could see that the pacific and south asia would be the logical next step for the japenese.
by cutting trade off with japan, FDR crippled their war machine.
capitalism relies 100% on the wages of working people and government spending. then why do capitalists drive down wages, squeeze companies in a futile attempt to ring out more profits than a company can naturally produce, creating zombie companies, then cut their own taxes, get rid of pesky regulations, refuse socialism, then gut safety nets, and the results every single time, deflation and depression.
the hoarding of money at the top, coupled with a lack of wages that drives consumption, and with over production from a flood of imports, means intense vicious competition for scarce dollars.
during the depression, if the government caught you selling for less than cost, off to jail you went. once deflation sets in, its hard to beat. see japan, who has never really escaped deflation.
so in most cases, its inflation first as the leeches and parasites charge ever more, and squeeze companies and wage earners ever more hoarding dollars at the top, then deflation sets in because we can no longer afford just about anything.
also remember, government spending is actually our wages also. the trick is, whats it being spent on?
bush jr. bragged about U.S. growth during his wars. when in reality, he was just measuring the amount of money being added to the economy because of his dufuss immoral wars.
the reality was all during this time, inflation, and inflationary imports from free trade which causes wage suppression was under cutting the american economy and creating unpayable foreign debts, and creating deflation, which was the inevitable consequences of bill clintons economic policies, and it all went boom by 2008.
once wage earners can no longer earn enough to pay their bills, service their debt, save a little and have time to enjoy the fruits of their labor, boom, its over.
it was all out in the open for all to see. but the manipulation of unemployment, poverty, and GDP statistics under clinton, showed a rosy economic situation instead. it never fooled me.
“Workers can’t pass on oil price increases into higher wages. Industrial capitalists can’t necessarily pass them on either. So what happens? People cut their prices, hoping to keep customers. But their neighbour is doing the same thing. Everybody is trying to pay down debt — which destroys money, slows the economy, and causes deflation.
Irving Fisher said it beautifully in the 1930s — what I call Fisher’s paradox: the more debtors pay, the more they owe. The real burden rises as the price level falls. That’s what leads to Great Depressions.”
“I want to pick up on Nika’s question about hyperinflation, since deflation and hyperinflation may go together. When countries cannot pay their foreign debts — and the Global South has enormous foreign debts falling due, all in dollars — what do they do? The IMF says: impose austerity. Make labour poorer and poorer until you can pay the debts. That’s today’s junk economics, and it goes back to David Ricardo’s bullionism.
Every hyperinflation in history has been caused by the need to pay foreign debt. Germany’s hyperinflation in the 1920s wasn’t caused by government spending on labour or social programs — that’s the myth. It was caused by printing Reichsmarks to throw onto the foreign exchange market to pay reparations. Chile and France had the same hyperinflation pattern.
And this reality is not taught in academic economics. So the graduates who join central banks around the world don’t understand the difference between hyperinflation, regular price inflation, and deflation. Steve and I are essentially persona non grata in polite circles, because what we’re spelling out threatens a very large power grab being put in place much like the Asian balancne-of-payments crisis of 1997-1998.”
Some responses to all (or near all):
To mago: we certainly travel in similar cultural circles. So speaking of Lola, a classic, I liked it even as a youth (before c. 1985 when Morrisey and the Smiths were big, and I briefly became gender-fluid for awhile, it didn’t stick, I like women’s body’s a lot more than men’s, but it was a short phase.) So my Firefox “Pocket” recently had click-bait to the effect of “Moby is repulsed by the Kinks’ song Lola.” I didn’t open it, who cares if he’s homophobic or frightened of other’s choices, that’s his loss. But the coincidence meter is running high today. Just did my weekly Tertulia Spanish conversation group with friends, there’s an older woman (late 70s) who had been in Nicaragua with her husband a decade before me, when Somoza was still in power. So I told her when I was there, 4-5 years after the Revolution, the revolutionary spirit and tolerance was very high. I think I’ve told this story on here before but will repeat it. So one morning when we were about to sing the National Anthem, there were 3 young gay guys, one was wearing make-up and lipstick, semi-crossdressing, and they started hugging and kissing one another. We all saw it, some of us smiled, some had a neutral response, nobody got angry or yelled at them despite the Catholic social conservatism, we moved on peacefully. So I was just reporting what happened, but when I got to the guys kissing part, my older friends’ face twisted with disgust and horror. I had to ask, “Sorry if I offended you, are you homophobic? I never sensed that.” She answered uncomfortably, No I’m not, I’m just surprised that DURING WARTIME people were acting out sexually!!” I thought that was bizarre and made the obvious point, No, N— don’t you know during wartime people have sex MORE? (‘coz they might die any day, didn’t make the obvious point.) She bobbed and weaved, her prejudice had been revealed, we moved on . . .
To Feral, I don’t greatly differ with your main points, but I did omit the fact that per Galloway (& others) the Brit security services (MI-6 or whomever) had looked into him and determined that he WAS a Security Risk. So Starmer was pretending NOT to know what he clearly did know, was told in writing, he is dirt. I am grateful to him though, he has destroyed Tony B.liar’s Labour party forever, they are toast. And as I said, I will be titillated by the trials at the end of the month viz the rent boys. And obviously I’m not censorious of the queer aspect, I am of the exploitation and hypocrisy of course. Caught a bit of Galloway today and he said that whomever is chosen from whichever party will be reprehensible filth, I have no reason to doubt that. I am an equal-opportunity hater of Deutschland and the UK, the sickest and most violent European countries (IMO, I know it’s arguable. We have one commenter here who has claimed Russians are subhumans and Hitler punked Stalin of course, despite how WW II actually ended.)
Stewart M’s response to Finster is a good call, to a point; they will still have free health-care, education, etc. while ‘Muricans are shat on and getting kicked out onto the streets, BUT they’re may be such massive devastation to their economy and infrastructure and morale if Trump drags this war shit out another 2 months there may be little to rescue, with all the powerful with a 2nd country Visa to bail out.
Nice observations on Thailand. I went twice, both c. 2009, had a great time. It is a great culture as the only major Asian country never to have been fully conquered by the Euro-US Axis of Empire, thus very unique relative to other places. I found the food and people and ambiance, the elephants and the Snake Museum (a friend insisted we go on the first trip) quite cool. Russell Dobular of Due Dissidence has traveled across 6 Asian countries now, though he is only posting his time in China on his smaller Russ on the Road NYC podcast, he is incommunicado with DD. He said he has no interest in the sex tourism part, he only saw a bit of that in passing in Thailand (a major sex-trafficking sight for the GIs during the Vietnam War as we all know), next to nothing like that in Laos, Cambodia, Vietnam (which he also praised as a very warm, forgiving and dynamic country).
Also to Stewart, I hope you are right about class-war. It is very overdue, obviously. ‘Muricans are dumbed down and stupified by propaganda, so it will take getting truly hungry and cold and fucked over to make it bloom.
I cannot and won’t dispute anything spud says, he seems nearly omniscient, deeply studied history. I’ve learned a bit about economics from Michael Hudson and Richard Wolff, as well as Yves of NC, but admit it’s not my forte. It is a big lever though, moves a lot. Not that it should be a God, God of the Market, like Friedman, Hayek and the other fascist Randians believe.
@Stewart M
All best with your Asian adventures.
Crude and drunken/drugged sex tourists
The desperate hustle along with basic human goodness, kindness and dignity publicly displayed
Pad Thai cilantro peanut noodles and Vietnamese pho
Go man go
Dig it
Send reports
Talking about the economy as if it is akin to the weather, making deflation or hyperinflation the equivalent of meteorologic phenomenon is troubling. The notion that hyperinflation could be an accident is convenient to ideologues, I guess, but it is absurd. And, yet, for the Germans who experienced the 1921-23 hyperinflation, I suppose it did seem sufficiently outside the range of normal experience as to be baffling. And, it ended abruptly in 1924 with the “mortgage-backed” Rentenmark (which were attached to dedicated fiscal flows, aka taxes on land wealth) and then the conventional gold-convertible Reichsmark, after Dawes. My understanding is that post-war inflation accelerated into hyperinflation with the decision to support the general strike in the occupied Ruhr with income support payments. I don’t credit the claim that the papiermark ever fetched gold for reparations via the foreign exchange markets; I don’t know how that could ever have worked, let alone been sustained for weeks — who would stand as counterparty and receive papiermarks? And, buy what with them? It would make no sense. The mark went into freefall on fx markets and with Germany not producing much in its largest industrial area, there was little to export and little prospect of capital flows to finance imports.
The secondary sources I have read on the subject have not impressed me with the reliability of their analyses, but again handwaving and morality plays abound in accounts of economic history. The usual story is that “printing” drove the inflation, but it seems to me that the printers were struggling to keep up with the price-setters. How was all this changing of wages and prices coordinated across the economy? How did the sandwich shoppe know to raise the sandwich price? How did the factory or insurance office know how much to bump up wage payouts? Was the Reichsbank wildly discounting commercial paper or its equivalent? Discounting trade bills furiously? I want to know the mechanics, but no one ever says.
Rudolf Havenstein was the central banker at the Reichsbank, who would have had to be the central actor and prime mover. He conveniently died at nearly the exact same moment Hjalmer Schacht introduced the Rentenmark from the Rentenbank, so whatever he was doing abruptly stopped, on schedule. Go figure. (Karl Helffereich — Schacht’s rival in architecting plans and for new Reichsbank President also died in April 1924.)
Thailand — “the only major Asian country never to have been fully conquered by the Euro-US Axis of Empire”
China, Japan, Ottoman Turkey and arguably Persia and maybe Afghanistan were never fully conquered by European powers, though Britain and Russia sure showed up in Persia as well as Britain in Afghanistan.
I’ve been to Thailand three times now (Bangkok twice, Pattaya once, and Phuket once). Of these three, I liked Phuket the best; it was someone less “touristy” than the rest and many of the things to do were Thai. We petted tigers and washed elephants (I’m in a movie washing an elephant, and I ask the audience “How do you know when this thing is clean?”), I petted big tigers; average sized tigers, and a tiger cub. Of these three, the cub was the most skittish. So was I!
We did a boat ride to some islands. All I can say is that people from the UAE are the biggest party animals around, once you get them out of the UAE. We traveled through caves that smelled of bat poop (as bats were overhead) and later we were allowed to swim in the ocean (but I didn’t bring swimwear, as it wasn’t advertised) but boy the the UAE’ers sure did. Besides, I was reminded of the bat poop smell.
But overall, while I get that Thailand was never colonized, it makes me uncomfortable to have a country seemingly designed to cater to my every vice. Vietnam’s not that way and neither is Taiwan. Maybe if I stayed in a smaller or more rural location I’d escape the boorish tourist crowds but I don’t speak Thai and probably English signage disappears (it does in Taiwan).
Both are friendly countries, but Vietnam just strikes me as the more geniune experience, even in the big cities. Taiwan is super nice and friendly too. However, the two countries are contrasts: Taiwan is super-safe, super-clean, incredibly impressive, incredibly efficient–I went to a Taiwanese hospital for an upper respiratory infection in 2022 and had to endure the “horrors” of “socialized medicine” which involved me paying like $19.90 for a doctor visit and medication. I also went with a Taiwanese friend for him to update his biometric passport, and he being him we got there only like 25 minutes before the place closed and it was packed—yet they processed people so efficiently we were out and done in 15 minutes!
In short, I come back from Taiwan and deal with the ever-worsening sh*tshow that is life in the US, and think “Gawd, why can’t we be like Taiwan?”
Vietnam, by contrast, is a developing country. Vietnam is like a friend or relative you have, who has problems, you see the problems, and yes, they need to fix the problems. But it is a country on the upswing, unlike my native US, and despite all the problems it’s so charming a place that like your friend or relative, you love it anyway.
Mago—there’s a family-run vegan restaurant just down the road I walk to a lot. You can get all sorts of tasty dishes, salads, appetizers, and more and eat your fill for $4 USD or less. I say “family-run” as you see their kids there either doing their homework or helping clean tables. Utterly charming!
However, watching those kids pains me to the world we’re leaving them, a world run by our incompetent and useless rich who are doing their damndest to destroy the planet and their futures just so they can win the “die with the most toys” contest with their peers.
This hyper mobility and jetting all over the world, whether it be for “work” or leisure, needs to stop or to be curtailed substantially or close to entirely. It’s part and parcel of what is murdering the planet.
China has restrictions on travel into the country right now and that may very well tighten further. I’m surprised Thailand and Vietnam aren’t following suit. I mean, the world is at war right now, is it not? Is the war on Iran as apocalyptic as the schadenfreuders claim it to be, or is it business as usual any and all armageddons be damned?
StewartM, consider yourself fortunate. At least you weren’t called a Señorita.
clearly hyper inflation is a policy choice, or the direct results of policies choices.
germany could not pay reparations, so they trashed their currency on purpose to the french and british.
bill mitchel has done some good work explaining how free trade can lead to hyper inflation. i think i posted his series a while back.
here in america, when import prices started to get out of hand, it coincided with increasing inflation here.
these things are not coincidences. when you get put into impossible situations, you do what ever is necessary to get out of it.
the mexican peso crises was a clear warning shot that free trade cannot work, nor has it ever worked, most likely never will.
you are watching this scenario play out now. foreign debt has been destabilizing america for decades now. we got away with it because we issue the worlds reserve currency.
but there comes a tipping point, and we have reached that now.
We were told that the french socilist party was done as well, but they seem to have bounced back.
As long as they have the british equivalent of the PMC, Labour come out just fine.
And yes, brotain has an NHS for now, but the average frustrated brit is still getting to look forward to a declining standard of living. The American standard of living also will decline, albeit not as sharply.
To Stewart M on Asia, I strongly disagree with your claims–
China “entirely”, okay that word does a lot of work for you. Yes, it’s too geographically large, so I will give you that one.
On Japan, you lose. British Empire forcibly opened it up in colonial era. After dropping 2 A-Bombs, US and MacArthur rewrote their Constitution and occupied them. Their society became greatly infantilized as most people realized the round-eye white man was entirely running their country, they had NO power (until the 80s, economically, and even then as we all know, they were told by Reagan to deindustrialize and be good Subordinates, and did so.) I hope the spirit of Yukio Mishima does not hear your false assertion. The ghost would haunt and pester you!! Oh, and earliest Japanese Manga shows the infantilized nature of the arts community and wider society. Okinawa doesn’t want to be part of Japan, ethnically separate, but hosts horrid US Military bases. US soldiers routinely for decades raped women and girls, or when high on amphetamines drove trucks or tanks over innocent Okinawans, got shipped home quietly without ANY punishment. (Maybe fined $50 by their superiors for raping/killing “gooks.”)
Ottoman Turkey chose poorly in a World War, I think even in the first they got their asses kicked siding with the Deutsche Master? (could be mistaken). “Young Turks” had to come in and make an effort to get sovereignty back.
On Persia you are correct, and Russians do not count as Western power (even to the Russia-obsessed LAS), so point taken.
I too enjoyed Phuket, great place. I dunno if it was there that I took a boat out in the beautiful pristine blue-green sea and did a little snorkeling. Amazing!! But on the way back, big choppy waves came in and some decades after I worked on the open sea, I had no ability not to massively vomit off the bow. (Weird thing; I’ve only vomited a couple times in my life, never drink to excess. I had an epiphany when my stomach emptied, I went into a high trance that would’ve taken me 2-3 hours of asana and controlled-breathing, which I also haven’t done for decades, to achieve.) Met a nice Dutch couple, he gave me good advice about looking at the horizon to stave off the purge, but it wasn’t enough.
Ugly Americans. I recall my 2nd or 3rd trip to Mexico, some bitch woman in the hotel getting service screamed, “No Spanish!! No Spanish!!” at the waiter. And when I was taking a break from picking in a hospedaje in Managua, there was a dumbass “journalist”, the Duenya asked him “Su pasaporte, senyor?” I had to translate for him!! I’m sure that dipshit wrote all kinds of columns about how the little brown people in the country yearned for freedom and US occupation so they could be starved and worked to death like before.
@spud: “germany could not pay reparations, so they trashed their currency”
Reparations were due in gold or in kind as commodities and such. Trashing their own currency did not touch the reparations obligation in any way.
What hyperinflation trashed was the domestic savings accumulated in the public and private borrowing used to finance the German war machine’s effort. My understanding is that a lot of public and private debt evaporated and with it a lot of lower-middle-class claims on wealth (aka “savings”) evaporated as well. Some papiermark deposits from Allied sources no doubt went up the flue with the rest.
Germany after WWI retained enormous industrial capacity. It hadn’t been devastated as it would be in the Second War, or as significant parts of French and Belgian industry had been in the First. I am not sure why they couldn’t pay.
Not to Karp about it, but those Silicon Valley transhumanist assholes are dangerously close to collapsing the world like comic book villains. Not really, because that’s all they are no matter their billions and temporary influence.
Play unplugged from your Palantir asshole if you want to make an enduring difference. Meanwhile shove your 21 point manifesto where the sun don’t shine, and have a nice day.
@Mark Level
I figured if anyone was going to get the Lola reference it would be you. I tried to embed a link but failed and gave up.
Yeah, I’m definitely into women, but at this stage of life I’m not going to try for an intimate relationship.
Keep on keeping on brother.
@Stewart M
Thanks for the report on the family run vegan eatery. I wouldn’t have expected it. If I were there I’d be a regular patron for sure. Carry on.
the trashing of the currency was to . . . buy gold back currency with fiat
hyper inflation was the plan to pay for reparations
Hyperinflation could not “buy” any gold. And, the Germans wanted to NOT pay reparations, to demonstrate conclusively their collective unwillingness to pay, performed dramatically as an inability to pay.
Efforts toward economic reconstruction and the restoration of international trade after WWI were strongly shaped by expectations that the Gold Standard would again be used to manage and facilitate international trade and investment. From the perspective of a modern understanding of fiat money, the hold that thinking had on economists and bankers can seem like religious faith or superstition, but it is what it was. German wartime inflation had been enormous; a deflation to get back to pre-war parity would have been impossible, imparting to debts fantastic “real” values. The hyperinflation wiped out papiermark debts. Hjalmer Schacht used the Rentenmark as a transition currency to redenominate the Mark, before instituting the Reichsmark as a conventional gold-convertible currency at pre-war parity, when the Dawes Plan made the whole project plausible. I cannot say that was “the Plan” all along, but viewed retrospectively, that is how the pieces came together.
It is not clear that there was, on net in real terms, much in the way of reparations paid after Dawes. What payments there were, were effectively funded from the financial flows created by private American lending, lending that itself was never repaid.
I would not say hyperinflation is an “easy” expedient for wiping out an accumulation of public and private debt. It did great damage to German political society, contributing to a sociopathic redistribution of wealth and capital.
One of my recurrent themes in comments is that using economic theories without clear referents makes discourse misleading if not nearly impossible. Using a theory of markets, where money is reduced to a disembodied numéraire, to narrate an analysis of an economy organized by bureaucracies and money finance is confusing foolishness, cubed. On that we have a largely similar skepticism.
the german government used fiat marks, to purchase gold back marks from the public to use for reparations.
they printed a lot of it to entice dales.
and with germany losing all of their over seas colonies that provided them with cheap resources, along with losing some of their europeon territory, they were very reliant on world trade to get what they needed for industrial production.
“British advocacy of free trade, he believed, was political cover for British domination of the world. A prosperous Germany required exchange with the British world, but this trade pattern could be supplemented, thought Hitler, by the conquest of a land empire that would even the scales between London and Berlin.
Once it had gained the appropriate colonies, Germany could preserve its industrial excellence while shifting its dependence for food from the British-controlled sea lanes to its own imperial hinterland.
It was reassuring to Hitler that such an alteration of the world order, such a reglobalization, had been achieved before, in recent memory. For generations of German imperialists, and for Hitler himself, the exemplary land empire was the United States of America.”
“Globalization led Hitler to the American dream. In American idiom, this notion that the standard of living was relative, based upon the perceived success of others, was called “keeping up with the Joneses.” Behind every imaginary German racial warrior stood an imaginary German woman who wanted ever more.”
“When Hitler wrote in My Struggle that Germany’s only opportunity for colonization was Europe, he discarded the possibility of a return to Africa. The search for racial inferiors to dominate required no long voyages by sea, since they were present in Eastern Europe as well.”
“The Slavs are born as a slavish mass,” wrote Hitler, “crying out for their master.” He meant primarily the Ukrainians, who inhabited a stretch of very fertile land, as well as their neighbors—Russians, Belarusians, and Poles.
“I need the Ukraine,” he stated, “in order that no one is able to starve us again, like in the last war.” The conquest of Ukraine would guarantee “a way of life for our people through the allocation of Lebensraum for the next hundred years.”
bruce wilder
Still puttering on my “deflation” project, I found “hostile symbiosis”. Very provocative analysis of how the U.S. and its advanced economy dependents are locked by finance into a destructive relationship with https://open.substack.com/pub/chinarbitrageur/p/hostile-symbiosis-a-world-where-win?
Still not sure I understand what drives the deflation, per se.
KT Chong
TL;DR: China facilitated a ceasefire based largely on Iranian terms. Iran made concessions. Then Trump accepted the gains and reneged.
China urged Iran to show flexibility, but the ceasefire was negotiated on Iran’s 10-point plan, NOT Trump’s 15-point “capitulation” demand. Under Iran’s framework, Tehran was supposed to retain control of the strait and continue collecting transit fees under that framework:
https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2026/4/10/is-trumps-iran-ceasefire-already-doomed
Iran’s Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei personally approved the ceasefire proposal. China was a facilitator, not the decider.
https://www.chosun.com/english/world-en/2026/04/08/DSS47MTHHBBM3AY6WY7FJAB2DQ/
What Happened IMO:
• China urged Iran to “show flexibility” and accept the ceasefire framework. Reports say that China “intervened at the last minute and strongly urged Iran to accept the negotiations”.
* Trump himself hinted at Beijing’s involvement, telling reporters “I hear yes” when asked if China pressured Tehran to negotiate.
https://www.msn.com/en-in/news/insight/china-s-quiet-diplomacy-credited-in-us-iran-ceasefire-push/gm-GM5A56CCE0
Here is what also happened in the same week:
China vetoed the US-backed UN resolution on Hormuz, i.e., refusing to give Washington a diplomatic blank check or leverage that could used in the negotiation:
https://www.newsweek.com/russia-responds-trump-iran-war-ceasefire-crushing-defeat-11797709
What is important:
• The ceasefire was negotiated on Iran’s terms, not Trump’s. Tehran’s 10-point plan became the framework, while Trump’s 15-point plan for “Iranian capitulation” was set aside.
• Iran was supposed to retained control of the strait and continued collecting transit fees during the truce. Trump publicly acknowledged this as “workable”.
As expected: immediately after Iran had lifted its blockade and closure of Strait of Hormuz as agreed, Trump broke the agreement. He pocketed the concessions from Iran, reneged on the deal’s core premise, and then demand more.
KT Chong
From the moment Iran reopened the strait on April 17, only for Trump to immediately refuse to lift his blockade, a tidal wave of outrage over being “tricked” swept across Chinese social — and, more importantly, state — media: Trump exploited China’s good-faith intervention to extract an Iranian concession, then immediately used the Beijing-brokered ceasefire against China.
i.e., Trump stabbed China in the back immediately after China helped him in negotiating a ceasefire.
This is straight from Trump’s “Darth Vader” negotiating-style playbook: “”I am altering the deal, pray I don’t alter it any further.”
1. First, he demanded China to pressure Iran. Beijing showed good faith, and Iran opened the strait.
2. Then, he kept the US blockade anyway. Trump’s Truth Social announcement made it explicit: Iran’s reopening was welcomed, but the blockade “will remain in full force and effect as it pertains to Iran, only”.
https://dailypioneer.com/news/iran-opens-strait-of-hormuz-us-blockade-of-iran-remains
3. He framed this as a favor to China. Trump told reporters, “China is very happy that I am permanently opening the Strait of Hormuz” — while the US Navy continued to choke Iranian oil exports that China depends on, which IMO Trump intended to use as a pressure-point leverage against Xi in his upcoming visit and negotiation in Beijing.
4. Iran sees it as a violation — and so do Chinese on the social and state media, and IMO many in Chinese leadership must also see it the same way. Tehran said the US had “repeatedly violating trust” and has reimposed closure on the Strait of Hormuz.
https://jen.jiji.com/jc/eng_agt?g=nation&k=20260418NATION-40065199
Trump got China to pressure Iran, Iran opened the strait, and then Trump kept the blockade anyway — stabbing China in the back while claiming he was doing China a favor.
P.S. Iran has done China a huge favor by reimposing its blockade of Hormuz, after China had foolishly persuaded (or pressured) Iran into accepting the ceasefire that ended up being essentially a US blockade and leverage against China. I hope China will remember who is the real enemy, backstabber, and villain — and who is the real friend who has honor and China’s back.
Mark Level
Mostly solid takes from KT Chong, but I will quibble on a few bits. In the earlier Hormuz thread, spud (pretty much always brilliant, very long posts) made the point that China is High on supplying goods to the economically broken West. Someone else covered this, John Helmer I think, recently; China sells drone technology to the West just as Russia sells energy to the West, and those resources are then used to– attack China and Russia!
Globalist economics is insane, and leadership across the globe plays along.
Listening to Mercouris at the moment, he made some good points which dampen the gloom on my just prior take on the Hormuz events. First he noted that Trump being the insecure sissy little girl (my words, he is much too polite) he is, once the strait was very briefly opened had to crybully brag that he’d WON and his all-powerful “Blockade of a Blockade” was locked in, if only to reassure his fragile baby ego that he never loses, and spread that to the world. The outcome: Scott Besant, who had JUST said all the Russian and Iranian oil would be sanctioned, then had to immediately unsanction it!! Unintended consequences. Additionally he pointed out that the Indian ship trying to exit that got hit with Iran’s fire turned back, doing the wise thing.
Never doubt the “freaks, alcoholics, and losers” of Trumpland’s ability to screw their own pooch and fuck up their most devious plans is a pretty clear lesson.
Oh, and Starmer’s tottering, lying that he didn’t know about his gay bff Lord Peter Mandelson’s warm relationship and trading British economic secrets directly to Epstein, nobody believes him. Mandelson had already “failed his vetting,” gave LPM a laudatory tongue bath while promoting him. George Galloway claimed that Starmer’s court battle with the 3 Ukrainian Rent Boys who knew about his cars, extra houses, etc. and torched them for something he did (pay denied? a venereal disease?) is impending.
Seems quite a sideshow. I do have to wonder: Will Maduro ever have his day in a New York Court? Will “Sir” Keir get his gay sexploits revealed in the British courts? And will Brigitte Macron EVER wrap up her lawsuit contra Candace Owens claiming Brigitte doesn’t have a penis. (She sure beats up the Mister, who “she” seduced when he was 15, old enough to be his dad/mom. Not just the cameras catching the savage face-slap when he was debarking from the plane, but later at the Berlin War Security Conference, he had to wear dark shades to cover the blackened eye(s.)
mago
Which just goes to show Mark Level, that kinks and pervs rule. Pass the eyeliner and falsies.
Speaking of the Kinks, Ray Davies did the Lola song back in 1970 when the trans thing was big in England. He was being tongue in cheek sardonic, not endorsing, but of course that passed beneath the radar of the trans crowd and radio DJ’s alike.
We live in a delusional world of illusion. There’s nothing to say there’s nothing to do it’s up to you . . . good morning, good morning, good morning
different clue
The ChinaGov and the IranGov both probably expected Trump to reward flexibility with treachery. But there is also a public opinion brainwar going along with the physical force-war on the ground and the water. When Trump is seen to reward flexibility with treachery, this make Iran look better and the US look worse.
Iran will win the brainwar as well as the ground and water power war and outcomes war.
Feral Finster
China was foolish to have pressured Iran, but China simply hopes to be able to sell things and make money and wants this war to just go away as it gets in the way of selling things and making money.
The Americans and Israelis, by contrast, are only interested in power, domination and control. If they have to crash the world economy to maintain power, then they’ll do it without a second thought.
Needless to say, the Americans see any peace feelers as capitulation, and they are getting ready to take another swing.
Feral Finster
@mark level:
“Oh, and Starmer’s tottering, lying that he didn’t know about his gay bff Lord Peter Mandelson’s warm relationship and trading British economic secrets directly to Epstein, nobody believes him.”
Of course everyone knows Starmer is lying, but what does it matter? As long as there is a non-zero chance that his replacement will be someone unacceptable to the british establishment, they’ll smirk and pretend to go along with it.
“Mandelson had already ‘failed his vetting,’ gave LPM a laudatory tongue bath while promoting him. ”
Mandelson was acceptable to the british establishment and most importantly, to the Americans.
Remember, the british political class has no priority other than the War On Russia, namely getting Americans to fight that war for them.
Again.
StewartM
Feral Finster:
If they have to crash the world economy to maintain power, then they’ll do it without a second thought
Because the Israeli economy is propped up by US largesse, it won’t suffer. And average USians suffering isn’t a concern for the Trumpists who will manipulate the markets to their advantage but to the detriment to the savings of ordinary Americans, cause a recession/depression to the detriment of ordinary Americans, while slashing healthcare and services for ordinary Americans.
This children, is what happens when “empathy” becomes a dirty word and a weakness. “Hey, If I’m ok, why care about you? I’ve got mine.” That rot set in a long time ago.
StewartM
Been traveling through Southeast Asia, with an international contingent. I caught a case of a crud (probably a virus).
Observations:
I’ve not been terribly impressed with Thailand, but it has nothing at all to do with the Thai people, their food, or their culture. What I don’t like about Thailand is (admittedly) in the cities I’ve been is overwhelming number of drunken, boorish, rude, tourists (usually Western, but also Middle Eastern and some South Asian). Thailand is the country where Westerners come to act badly, even “colonial”, if you catch the meaning. It’s party-zone for these.
I was there during the Songkran festival, where I got sick. Songkran (a Thai New Year celebration) involves big water gun fights between participants. But these water gun fights have rules: you’re not supposed to splash any non-participant, especially the old, those carrying infants, monks, motorcycle drivers (have caused accidents) or anyone with property that could be damaged. Simply raising your hands as to say “not me” is good enough to avoid getting deliberately splashed….for Thai people that is. Shooting someone who’s “protected” is actually a violation codified in Thai law.
But the Westerners might shoot anyone and everyone — “Lookie, I’m making that person miserable” -yuk yuk yuk. Protest and say “no” they’ll shoot you harder. It happened to me, from a bunch of drunks sitting in open-air German bar. What I’ve read in the comments is that the water gun stuff used to be just for Thai children, but then “we” took it over. Now Songkran has fatalities–95 this year, at last count.
This was the most irksome feature this year, but in my non-Songkran visits it’s just the proliferation of everything non-Thai, everything “for the Western tourist” — the food offerings, the massage parlors (some say “no sex”, so I guess if there’s no such sign there IS sex?) It’s just a place for Westerners to act badly.
By contrast, Vietnam is sweet. I’ve been staying in an apartment complex on the east side, and every day I went out I’d see simple everyday life—parents carrying babies and/or small children, old people chatting on park benches, students doing studies at the coffee shops, and more. The other day me and a Russian friend helped a mother with two babies in strollers up some steps. You open doors for old people or people carrying packages and stuff. Vietnam has is entertainment, true, but it (and Taiwan) is “entertainment for us”, though foreigners are welcome to join if they want. It’s not just “entertainment for Western tourists”.
The other thing in my travels here is I’m seeing both the tyranny of AI and of our financial system. Gawd save us from biometrics! I’ve seen too-many instances of failure to recognize faces or thumbprints, and too-many web pages where I have accounts think I’m a hacker (I couldn’t check my auto insurance to see if it was paid, for example). Transferring and getting money is getting harder too. Of course, all this is happening because the people who suffer from this failure aren’t the ones implementing it. I’d prefer we stayed with passwords; just make them strong.
bruce wilder
If the real war is class war, then the long-expected, mysteriously delayed U.S. financial crash will have interesting features and benefits embedded.
“Hostile symbiosis” identifies the China / U.S. economic and geopolitical relationship, in which China depends for its own stability on keeping the parasitized zombie U.S. staggering forward, even as the U.S. flails abroad and sinks into depression domestically.
“Weaponized incompetence” is the standard of policymaking and personnel selection underlying U.S. and European partisan politics. Leadership selection is replaced by systematic deselection as corruption, expectations of corruption and virtual and actual assassination short-circuit any possibility of political reform. AI slop feeds Tiktok and X, which in turn fries the doom-scrolling American mind.
wot, me worry?
spud
if the world has not figured it out by now, then they are hopeless, and will get picked off one at a time.
the dayton accords should have been their awakening. north korea understood it, no one else did.
your not negotiating with the american government, you are in reality, negotiating with the rich.
Soros wanted that lithium mine really bad in yugoslavia, and plane loads of parasites were being flown in to see what they could steal with ease.
the dayton accords were take it or leave it, no real negotiations.
so why are the big three, russia, china, and iran still thinking they can negotiate with parasites?
its that sugar high from trade. as others have mentioned.
if FDR had not seen the lesson that was occurring from russia’s pounding of the japanese in 1938, he would have worried about trade instead of cutting the japanese off.
once japan lost that dream of taking siberia away from russia, everyone without blinders could see that the pacific and south asia would be the logical next step for the japenese.
by cutting trade off with japan, FDR crippled their war machine.
spud
bruce wilder:
capitalism relies 100% on the wages of working people and government spending. then why do capitalists drive down wages, squeeze companies in a futile attempt to ring out more profits than a company can naturally produce, creating zombie companies, then cut their own taxes, get rid of pesky regulations, refuse socialism, then gut safety nets, and the results every single time, deflation and depression.
the hoarding of money at the top, coupled with a lack of wages that drives consumption, and with over production from a flood of imports, means intense vicious competition for scarce dollars.
during the depression, if the government caught you selling for less than cost, off to jail you went. once deflation sets in, its hard to beat. see japan, who has never really escaped deflation.
so in most cases, its inflation first as the leeches and parasites charge ever more, and squeeze companies and wage earners ever more hoarding dollars at the top, then deflation sets in because we can no longer afford just about anything.
also remember, government spending is actually our wages also. the trick is, whats it being spent on?
bush jr. bragged about U.S. growth during his wars. when in reality, he was just measuring the amount of money being added to the economy because of his dufuss immoral wars.
the reality was all during this time, inflation, and inflationary imports from free trade which causes wage suppression was under cutting the american economy and creating unpayable foreign debts, and creating deflation, which was the inevitable consequences of bill clintons economic policies, and it all went boom by 2008.
once wage earners can no longer earn enough to pay their bills, service their debt, save a little and have time to enjoy the fruits of their labor, boom, its over.
it was all out in the open for all to see. but the manipulation of unemployment, poverty, and GDP statistics under clinton, showed a rosy economic situation instead. it never fooled me.
https://michael-hudson.com/2026/03/inflation-first-deflation-next/
“Workers can’t pass on oil price increases into higher wages. Industrial capitalists can’t necessarily pass them on either. So what happens? People cut their prices, hoping to keep customers. But their neighbour is doing the same thing. Everybody is trying to pay down debt — which destroys money, slows the economy, and causes deflation.
Irving Fisher said it beautifully in the 1930s — what I call Fisher’s paradox: the more debtors pay, the more they owe. The real burden rises as the price level falls. That’s what leads to Great Depressions.”
“I want to pick up on Nika’s question about hyperinflation, since deflation and hyperinflation may go together. When countries cannot pay their foreign debts — and the Global South has enormous foreign debts falling due, all in dollars — what do they do? The IMF says: impose austerity. Make labour poorer and poorer until you can pay the debts. That’s today’s junk economics, and it goes back to David Ricardo’s bullionism.
Every hyperinflation in history has been caused by the need to pay foreign debt. Germany’s hyperinflation in the 1920s wasn’t caused by government spending on labour or social programs — that’s the myth. It was caused by printing Reichsmarks to throw onto the foreign exchange market to pay reparations. Chile and France had the same hyperinflation pattern.
And this reality is not taught in academic economics. So the graduates who join central banks around the world don’t understand the difference between hyperinflation, regular price inflation, and deflation. Steve and I are essentially persona non grata in polite circles, because what we’re spelling out threatens a very large power grab being put in place much like the Asian balancne-of-payments crisis of 1997-1998.”
…
Ian Welsh
During the 90s I was just beginning to learn, but I knew the economy was shit, no matter what the stats said.
Mark Level
Some responses to all (or near all):
To mago: we certainly travel in similar cultural circles. So speaking of Lola, a classic, I liked it even as a youth (before c. 1985 when Morrisey and the Smiths were big, and I briefly became gender-fluid for awhile, it didn’t stick, I like women’s body’s a lot more than men’s, but it was a short phase.) So my Firefox “Pocket” recently had click-bait to the effect of “Moby is repulsed by the Kinks’ song Lola.” I didn’t open it, who cares if he’s homophobic or frightened of other’s choices, that’s his loss. But the coincidence meter is running high today. Just did my weekly Tertulia Spanish conversation group with friends, there’s an older woman (late 70s) who had been in Nicaragua with her husband a decade before me, when Somoza was still in power. So I told her when I was there, 4-5 years after the Revolution, the revolutionary spirit and tolerance was very high. I think I’ve told this story on here before but will repeat it. So one morning when we were about to sing the National Anthem, there were 3 young gay guys, one was wearing make-up and lipstick, semi-crossdressing, and they started hugging and kissing one another. We all saw it, some of us smiled, some had a neutral response, nobody got angry or yelled at them despite the Catholic social conservatism, we moved on peacefully. So I was just reporting what happened, but when I got to the guys kissing part, my older friends’ face twisted with disgust and horror. I had to ask, “Sorry if I offended you, are you homophobic? I never sensed that.” She answered uncomfortably, No I’m not, I’m just surprised that DURING WARTIME people were acting out sexually!!” I thought that was bizarre and made the obvious point, No, N— don’t you know during wartime people have sex MORE? (‘coz they might die any day, didn’t make the obvious point.) She bobbed and weaved, her prejudice had been revealed, we moved on . . .
To Feral, I don’t greatly differ with your main points, but I did omit the fact that per Galloway (& others) the Brit security services (MI-6 or whomever) had looked into him and determined that he WAS a Security Risk. So Starmer was pretending NOT to know what he clearly did know, was told in writing, he is dirt. I am grateful to him though, he has destroyed Tony B.liar’s Labour party forever, they are toast. And as I said, I will be titillated by the trials at the end of the month viz the rent boys. And obviously I’m not censorious of the queer aspect, I am of the exploitation and hypocrisy of course. Caught a bit of Galloway today and he said that whomever is chosen from whichever party will be reprehensible filth, I have no reason to doubt that. I am an equal-opportunity hater of Deutschland and the UK, the sickest and most violent European countries (IMO, I know it’s arguable. We have one commenter here who has claimed Russians are subhumans and Hitler punked Stalin of course, despite how WW II actually ended.)
Stewart M’s response to Finster is a good call, to a point; they will still have free health-care, education, etc. while ‘Muricans are shat on and getting kicked out onto the streets, BUT they’re may be such massive devastation to their economy and infrastructure and morale if Trump drags this war shit out another 2 months there may be little to rescue, with all the powerful with a 2nd country Visa to bail out.
Nice observations on Thailand. I went twice, both c. 2009, had a great time. It is a great culture as the only major Asian country never to have been fully conquered by the Euro-US Axis of Empire, thus very unique relative to other places. I found the food and people and ambiance, the elephants and the Snake Museum (a friend insisted we go on the first trip) quite cool. Russell Dobular of Due Dissidence has traveled across 6 Asian countries now, though he is only posting his time in China on his smaller Russ on the Road NYC podcast, he is incommunicado with DD. He said he has no interest in the sex tourism part, he only saw a bit of that in passing in Thailand (a major sex-trafficking sight for the GIs during the Vietnam War as we all know), next to nothing like that in Laos, Cambodia, Vietnam (which he also praised as a very warm, forgiving and dynamic country).
Also to Stewart, I hope you are right about class-war. It is very overdue, obviously. ‘Muricans are dumbed down and stupified by propaganda, so it will take getting truly hungry and cold and fucked over to make it bloom.
I cannot and won’t dispute anything spud says, he seems nearly omniscient, deeply studied history. I’ve learned a bit about economics from Michael Hudson and Richard Wolff, as well as Yves of NC, but admit it’s not my forte. It is a big lever though, moves a lot. Not that it should be a God, God of the Market, like Friedman, Hayek and the other fascist Randians believe.
mago
@Stewart M
All best with your Asian adventures.
Crude and drunken/drugged sex tourists
The desperate hustle along with basic human goodness, kindness and dignity publicly displayed
Pad Thai cilantro peanut noodles and Vietnamese pho
Go man go
Dig it
Send reports
bruce wilder
@spud
Talking about the economy as if it is akin to the weather, making deflation or hyperinflation the equivalent of meteorologic phenomenon is troubling. The notion that hyperinflation could be an accident is convenient to ideologues, I guess, but it is absurd. And, yet, for the Germans who experienced the 1921-23 hyperinflation, I suppose it did seem sufficiently outside the range of normal experience as to be baffling. And, it ended abruptly in 1924 with the “mortgage-backed” Rentenmark (which were attached to dedicated fiscal flows, aka taxes on land wealth) and then the conventional gold-convertible Reichsmark, after Dawes. My understanding is that post-war inflation accelerated into hyperinflation with the decision to support the general strike in the occupied Ruhr with income support payments. I don’t credit the claim that the papiermark ever fetched gold for reparations via the foreign exchange markets; I don’t know how that could ever have worked, let alone been sustained for weeks — who would stand as counterparty and receive papiermarks? And, buy what with them? It would make no sense. The mark went into freefall on fx markets and with Germany not producing much in its largest industrial area, there was little to export and little prospect of capital flows to finance imports.
The secondary sources I have read on the subject have not impressed me with the reliability of their analyses, but again handwaving and morality plays abound in accounts of economic history. The usual story is that “printing” drove the inflation, but it seems to me that the printers were struggling to keep up with the price-setters. How was all this changing of wages and prices coordinated across the economy? How did the sandwich shoppe know to raise the sandwich price? How did the factory or insurance office know how much to bump up wage payouts? Was the Reichsbank wildly discounting commercial paper or its equivalent? Discounting trade bills furiously? I want to know the mechanics, but no one ever says.
Rudolf Havenstein was the central banker at the Reichsbank, who would have had to be the central actor and prime mover. He conveniently died at nearly the exact same moment Hjalmer Schacht introduced the Rentenmark from the Rentenbank, so whatever he was doing abruptly stopped, on schedule. Go figure. (Karl Helffereich — Schacht’s rival in architecting plans and for new Reichsbank President also died in April 1924.)
bruce wilder
Thailand — “the only major Asian country never to have been fully conquered by the Euro-US Axis of Empire”
China, Japan, Ottoman Turkey and arguably Persia and maybe Afghanistan were never fully conquered by European powers, though Britain and Russia sure showed up in Persia as well as Britain in Afghanistan.
Thailand was overrun by Japan in WWII.
StewartM
Mark Level:
I’ve been to Thailand three times now (Bangkok twice, Pattaya once, and Phuket once). Of these three, I liked Phuket the best; it was someone less “touristy” than the rest and many of the things to do were Thai. We petted tigers and washed elephants (I’m in a movie washing an elephant, and I ask the audience “How do you know when this thing is clean?”), I petted big tigers; average sized tigers, and a tiger cub. Of these three, the cub was the most skittish. So was I!
We did a boat ride to some islands. All I can say is that people from the UAE are the biggest party animals around, once you get them out of the UAE. We traveled through caves that smelled of bat poop (as bats were overhead) and later we were allowed to swim in the ocean (but I didn’t bring swimwear, as it wasn’t advertised) but boy the the UAE’ers sure did. Besides, I was reminded of the bat poop smell.
But overall, while I get that Thailand was never colonized, it makes me uncomfortable to have a country seemingly designed to cater to my every vice. Vietnam’s not that way and neither is Taiwan. Maybe if I stayed in a smaller or more rural location I’d escape the boorish tourist crowds but I don’t speak Thai and probably English signage disappears (it does in Taiwan).
Both are friendly countries, but Vietnam just strikes me as the more geniune experience, even in the big cities. Taiwan is super nice and friendly too. However, the two countries are contrasts: Taiwan is super-safe, super-clean, incredibly impressive, incredibly efficient–I went to a Taiwanese hospital for an upper respiratory infection in 2022 and had to endure the “horrors” of “socialized medicine” which involved me paying like $19.90 for a doctor visit and medication. I also went with a Taiwanese friend for him to update his biometric passport, and he being him we got there only like 25 minutes before the place closed and it was packed—yet they processed people so efficiently we were out and done in 15 minutes!
In short, I come back from Taiwan and deal with the ever-worsening sh*tshow that is life in the US, and think “Gawd, why can’t we be like Taiwan?”
Vietnam, by contrast, is a developing country. Vietnam is like a friend or relative you have, who has problems, you see the problems, and yes, they need to fix the problems. But it is a country on the upswing, unlike my native US, and despite all the problems it’s so charming a place that like your friend or relative, you love it anyway.
Mago—there’s a family-run vegan restaurant just down the road I walk to a lot. You can get all sorts of tasty dishes, salads, appetizers, and more and eat your fill for $4 USD or less. I say “family-run” as you see their kids there either doing their homework or helping clean tables. Utterly charming!
However, watching those kids pains me to the world we’re leaving them, a world run by our incompetent and useless rich who are doing their damndest to destroy the planet and their futures just so they can win the “die with the most toys” contest with their peers.
Like & Subscribe
This hyper mobility and jetting all over the world, whether it be for “work” or leisure, needs to stop or to be curtailed substantially or close to entirely. It’s part and parcel of what is murdering the planet.
China has restrictions on travel into the country right now and that may very well tighten further. I’m surprised Thailand and Vietnam aren’t following suit. I mean, the world is at war right now, is it not? Is the war on Iran as apocalyptic as the schadenfreuders claim it to be, or is it business as usual any and all armageddons be damned?
StewartM, consider yourself fortunate. At least you weren’t called a Señorita.
spud
bruce wilder:
clearly hyper inflation is a policy choice, or the direct results of policies choices.
germany could not pay reparations, so they trashed their currency on purpose to the french and british.
bill mitchel has done some good work explaining how free trade can lead to hyper inflation. i think i posted his series a while back.
here in america, when import prices started to get out of hand, it coincided with increasing inflation here.
these things are not coincidences. when you get put into impossible situations, you do what ever is necessary to get out of it.
the mexican peso crises was a clear warning shot that free trade cannot work, nor has it ever worked, most likely never will.
you are watching this scenario play out now. foreign debt has been destabilizing america for decades now. we got away with it because we issue the worlds reserve currency.
but there comes a tipping point, and we have reached that now.
Feral Finster
@ Mark Level:
We were told that the french socilist party was done as well, but they seem to have bounced back.
As long as they have the british equivalent of the PMC, Labour come out just fine.
And yes, brotain has an NHS for now, but the average frustrated brit is still getting to look forward to a declining standard of living. The American standard of living also will decline, albeit not as sharply.
Since the rich will do just dandy, nobody cares.
Mark Level
To Stewart M on Asia, I strongly disagree with your claims–
China “entirely”, okay that word does a lot of work for you. Yes, it’s too geographically large, so I will give you that one.
On Japan, you lose. British Empire forcibly opened it up in colonial era. After dropping 2 A-Bombs, US and MacArthur rewrote their Constitution and occupied them. Their society became greatly infantilized as most people realized the round-eye white man was entirely running their country, they had NO power (until the 80s, economically, and even then as we all know, they were told by Reagan to deindustrialize and be good Subordinates, and did so.) I hope the spirit of Yukio Mishima does not hear your false assertion. The ghost would haunt and pester you!! Oh, and earliest Japanese Manga shows the infantilized nature of the arts community and wider society. Okinawa doesn’t want to be part of Japan, ethnically separate, but hosts horrid US Military bases. US soldiers routinely for decades raped women and girls, or when high on amphetamines drove trucks or tanks over innocent Okinawans, got shipped home quietly without ANY punishment. (Maybe fined $50 by their superiors for raping/killing “gooks.”)
Ottoman Turkey chose poorly in a World War, I think even in the first they got their asses kicked siding with the Deutsche Master? (could be mistaken). “Young Turks” had to come in and make an effort to get sovereignty back.
On Persia you are correct, and Russians do not count as Western power (even to the Russia-obsessed LAS), so point taken.
I too enjoyed Phuket, great place. I dunno if it was there that I took a boat out in the beautiful pristine blue-green sea and did a little snorkeling. Amazing!! But on the way back, big choppy waves came in and some decades after I worked on the open sea, I had no ability not to massively vomit off the bow. (Weird thing; I’ve only vomited a couple times in my life, never drink to excess. I had an epiphany when my stomach emptied, I went into a high trance that would’ve taken me 2-3 hours of asana and controlled-breathing, which I also haven’t done for decades, to achieve.) Met a nice Dutch couple, he gave me good advice about looking at the horizon to stave off the purge, but it wasn’t enough.
Ugly Americans. I recall my 2nd or 3rd trip to Mexico, some bitch woman in the hotel getting service screamed, “No Spanish!! No Spanish!!” at the waiter. And when I was taking a break from picking in a hospedaje in Managua, there was a dumbass “journalist”, the Duenya asked him “Su pasaporte, senyor?” I had to translate for him!! I’m sure that dipshit wrote all kinds of columns about how the little brown people in the country yearned for freedom and US occupation so they could be starved and worked to death like before.
bruce wilder
@spud: “germany could not pay reparations, so they trashed their currency”
Reparations were due in gold or in kind as commodities and such. Trashing their own currency did not touch the reparations obligation in any way.
What hyperinflation trashed was the domestic savings accumulated in the public and private borrowing used to finance the German war machine’s effort. My understanding is that a lot of public and private debt evaporated and with it a lot of lower-middle-class claims on wealth (aka “savings”) evaporated as well. Some papiermark deposits from Allied sources no doubt went up the flue with the rest.
Germany after WWI retained enormous industrial capacity. It hadn’t been devastated as it would be in the Second War, or as significant parts of French and Belgian industry had been in the First. I am not sure why they couldn’t pay.
mago
Not to Karp about it, but those Silicon Valley transhumanist assholes are dangerously close to collapsing the world like comic book villains. Not really, because that’s all they are no matter their billions and temporary influence.
Play unplugged from your Palantir asshole if you want to make an enduring difference. Meanwhile shove your 21 point manifesto where the sun don’t shine, and have a nice day.
different clue
Here, from the GuysBeingDudes subreddit, is “Gym strong vs country strong”
https://www.reddit.com/r/GuysBeingDudes/comments/1sqxuvb/gym_strong_vs_country_strong/
spud
bruce wilder:
the trashing of the currency was to wipe out internal debt, buy gold back currency with fiat, then borrow from america.
so hyper inflation was the plan to pay for reparations. they also bartered.
so hyper inflation just does not pop out of no where, so far its been a policy, connected to foreign debts.
foreign debts are hard to pay off. internal government debt can be done away with easily.
mago
@Mark Level
I figured if anyone was going to get the Lola reference it would be you. I tried to embed a link but failed and gave up.
Yeah, I’m definitely into women, but at this stage of life I’m not going to try for an intimate relationship.
Keep on keeping on brother.
@Stewart M
Thanks for the report on the family run vegan eatery. I wouldn’t have expected it. If I were there I’d be a regular patron for sure. Carry on.
bruce wilder
Hyperinflation could not “buy” any gold. And, the Germans wanted to NOT pay reparations, to demonstrate conclusively their collective unwillingness to pay, performed dramatically as an inability to pay.
Efforts toward economic reconstruction and the restoration of international trade after WWI were strongly shaped by expectations that the Gold Standard would again be used to manage and facilitate international trade and investment. From the perspective of a modern understanding of fiat money, the hold that thinking had on economists and bankers can seem like religious faith or superstition, but it is what it was. German wartime inflation had been enormous; a deflation to get back to pre-war parity would have been impossible, imparting to debts fantastic “real” values. The hyperinflation wiped out papiermark debts. Hjalmer Schacht used the Rentenmark as a transition currency to redenominate the Mark, before instituting the Reichsmark as a conventional gold-convertible currency at pre-war parity, when the Dawes Plan made the whole project plausible. I cannot say that was “the Plan” all along, but viewed retrospectively, that is how the pieces came together.
It is not clear that there was, on net in real terms, much in the way of reparations paid after Dawes. What payments there were, were effectively funded from the financial flows created by private American lending, lending that itself was never repaid.
I would not say hyperinflation is an “easy” expedient for wiping out an accumulation of public and private debt. It did great damage to German political society, contributing to a sociopathic redistribution of wealth and capital.
One of my recurrent themes in comments is that using economic theories without clear referents makes discourse misleading if not nearly impossible. Using a theory of markets, where money is reduced to a disembodied numéraire, to narrate an analysis of an economy organized by bureaucracies and money finance is confusing foolishness, cubed. On that we have a largely similar skepticism.
spud
bruce wilder:
the german government used fiat marks, to purchase gold back marks from the public to use for reparations.
they printed a lot of it to entice dales.
and with germany losing all of their over seas colonies that provided them with cheap resources, along with losing some of their europeon territory, they were very reliant on world trade to get what they needed for industrial production.
hitler spelled that out in mein kampf.
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2017/03/nazi-germanys-american-dream-hitler-modeled-his-concept-of-racial-struggle-and-global-campaign-after-americas-conquest-of-native-americans.html
“British advocacy of free trade, he believed, was political cover for British domination of the world. A prosperous Germany required exchange with the British world, but this trade pattern could be supplemented, thought Hitler, by the conquest of a land empire that would even the scales between London and Berlin.
Once it had gained the appropriate colonies, Germany could preserve its industrial excellence while shifting its dependence for food from the British-controlled sea lanes to its own imperial hinterland.
It was reassuring to Hitler that such an alteration of the world order, such a reglobalization, had been achieved before, in recent memory. For generations of German imperialists, and for Hitler himself, the exemplary land empire was the United States of America.”
“Globalization led Hitler to the American dream. In American idiom, this notion that the standard of living was relative, based upon the perceived success of others, was called “keeping up with the Joneses.” Behind every imaginary German racial warrior stood an imaginary German woman who wanted ever more.”
“When Hitler wrote in My Struggle that Germany’s only opportunity for colonization was Europe, he discarded the possibility of a return to Africa. The search for racial inferiors to dominate required no long voyages by sea, since they were present in Eastern Europe as well.”
“The Slavs are born as a slavish mass,” wrote Hitler, “crying out for their master.” He meant primarily the Ukrainians, who inhabited a stretch of very fertile land, as well as their neighbors—Russians, Belarusians, and Poles.
“I need the Ukraine,” he stated, “in order that no one is able to starve us again, like in the last war.” The conquest of Ukraine would guarantee “a way of life for our people through the allocation of Lebensraum for the next hundred years.”