The horizon is not so far as we can see, but as far as we can imagine

Author: Ian Welsh Page 55 of 436

How Many Americans Will Die From Civilization Collapse?

These are elevated comments by GrimJim.

What’s useful about this is that the estimates are made explicit. — Ian

Eleven percent of Americans use insulin to survive. They are dead within three months of the power going out.

Between 17 and 20% of Americans need weekly if not daily mental health medication. They are all either dead or reduced to needing constant care within three to six months. (Ian-probably an overstatement, many will be functional once they come off, but a non-tapered withdrawal from most ant-depressants or GABA drugs is ugly.)

Altogether, some 66% of Americans take some kind of life-saving or life-supporting medication daily. Let’s say that at least half of those are dead within one year of the lights going out. That’s 33% of the population.

During the Rwandan Genocide, about 75% of the Tutsi population was killed in merely 100 days. Like Rwanda and unlike Bosnia, there will be no one trying to stop it, no outside forces intervening. Imagine the Pseudo-Christian White Nationalists killing 75% of the “undesirables” they can get their hands on. Imagine many more of those American “undesirables” being able to fight back as they are being genocided (the Tutsis died en masse, not generally have the resources to fight back). It will quickly become tit-for-tat, with no mercy on either side, as the “undesirables” will no longer grant any mercy once they figure out what the Pseudo-Christian White Nationalists plan for them. So that’s about 75% of 40% of the remaining population.

Then there will further be a much more massive death all around due to the lack of medical supplies and services. Add in pestilence and plague, and that increases the number.

And about a year in, the survivors will have used up remaining food stocks. If they have been unable to start farming, on a traditional MINIMAL level of about 5 to 10 farmers per 1 non-farmer, there will be starvation.

So…

345,000,000 Americans to start…
less 33% or 113,850,000 from medical issues = 231,150,000
less 75% of 40% (69,345,000) from Genocide = 161,805,000
less ~10% from plague and pestilence (16,180,500) = 145,624,500
And less ~20% due to starvation (29,124,900) = 116,499,600.

My estimate is that there will be only about 116,000,000 Americans left within two years of the collapse and the start of ACWII. That’s a 66% death rate within two years. That’s a minimum, with my being generous on all the numbers.

Estimates based on an EMP attack that takes down the entire USA power grid have been a 90% death rate in merely one year. So I’m actually looking at things with rose-colored glasses…

And Elevated Comment two (on farms and food)

Note: Right now only 2% of Americans live on farms.

TWO PERCENT.

And all those farms, with the exception of Amish and some Mennonite farms, depend on gasoline and machines. and most of those machines are modern, complex, computer-based machines, which will be useless within weeks or months of the economy collapsing.

During the Great Depression, 20% of Americans lived in farms. This is the only reason starvation was not rampant. Just about everyone was related to or knew someone who had a farm, so they could count on them for some support.

Now, almost no one knows anyone who lives on a farm that is sustainable without advanced technology and gasoline. And the way monoculture has taken over American farms, along with dependency on chemical fertilizers and insecticides, plus the lack of remotely enough dray beasts, classic farming can’t be rebuilt fast enough to service teeming millions.

And so teeming millions will die.

That’s not counting destruction and attrition from refugees from the cities. Refugees are not going to care where or how they get their food; they will take it if need be, over the dead bodies of whoever gets in the way. And they will vastly outnumber the local farmer folk and their local friends. It will be like that end scene in The Day After, when the refugees took the farmer’s cow and slaughtered it, and he went out to complain. He didn’t even threaten them, and they just mowed him down.

That will be played out over and over again, everywhere. 80% of Americans live in a city, which is a literal food wasteland. When they start moving out, it will be like locusts, and anyone who gets in their way simply dies.

Ian – all this assumes a hard collapse as opposed to a slow withering. But that scenario is entirely possibly with hard enough shocks, and we’re doing almost everything we can to ensure they happen.

 

You Can’t Make Good Decisions If You Believe Lies

Nate Wilcox recently wrote about the signal to noise ratio in the information we receive:

Coming in a context of other tweets about Germany’s up is down policies declaring Jews who oppose genocide in Palestine to be anti-semites, a nominally left wing publication disinforming their readers about Brazil’s Lula, relentless economic gaslighting, a seemingly cooked-up online conflict between Black Americans and Palestinians, and the MI6 blaming Russia for the UK’s recent racist pogroms…

Just before the Iraq war, 72% of Americans believed Iraq was behind 9/11. Official inflation numbers, as I’ve written often, complete fiction at this point. The propaganda around mass rape and beheading on Oct 7th has proven to have no physical evidence. Olds will remember the stories, in the original Gulf War, of how Iraq soldiers were bayoneting babies in hospitals. The NYTimes, also a prime purveyor of October 7 atrocity propaganda, systematically lied about Iraq WMD to justify the Iraq war. An academic study found that the British media lied about Corbyn around 80% of the time, and they managed to convince many Brits that the long time anti-racism protestor was anti-semitic. The WHO and the CDC denied that Covid was airborne for ages and pretended children weren’t particularly at risk.

And these are just highlights. One could make a list of thousands.

We are swimming in an ocean of shit.

No one can make good decisions: who to vote for, who to support, what to believe, or what to do, if they believe large numbers of lies.

And it truly is an Ocean of Shit: there’s so much that no one can keep up, certainly no one who doesn’t make it one of the main things they do.

Further, the lies send many people spiraling off into the worst kinds of conspiracy theories. “Conspiracy theory” isn’t a synonym for “wrong” there are plenty of real conspiracies (lately lots of them to raise prices, to pick a perfectly mundane one), but when you know you’re being lied to, and when it’s systematic, it’s hard to find a foundation point to build from, and from that to construct a relatively accurate model of reality.

If Corbyn’s an anti-semite, Putin loving, lying commie, perhaps you shouldn’t vote for him.

If Iraq was behind 9/11 then invading them makes sense.

And so on.

And this disease infects the professional and managerial classes the worst. Economists believe the figures coming out of the Bureau of Labor Statistics then propose or implement policies based on fictional numbers, for example.

Reality isn’t allowed to intrude until it’s beyond undeniable, at which point the major mistakes have already been made and the situation is often un-recoverable.

There’s more to it that this, of course. Almost everyone in our societies has been trained to be an order-taker, with lives that involve first doing what teacher says then doing what the boss says. Our ancestors called such people wage slaves and they were right. We’re also a consumer society: we pick from choices offered to us by others, we don’t produce our politics or our homes or our food or almost anything else: we don’t create and thus our choices are just from a menu offered by others.

People conditioned all their lives to do what they’re told, pick from a menu and swimming in an ocean of lies can’t make good decisions. It’s that simple.

The first step in fixing any problem is always facing and acknowledging the truth. If you can’t do that, all you can do is make another bad decision.


My writing happens because readers donate or subscribe. If you value that writing, and you can afford to, please support it.

Pavel Durov, CEO of Telegram, Arrested In France

Durov’s Russian, and an interesting guy. He refused to cooperate when Russia asked him for user information, for example. He appears to believe in the principle of freedom of speech, which is radical at this point. Telegram was banned in Russia from 2018 to 2021.

As most people know Telegram is where most uncensored information on the Russia-Ukraine and Gaza wars are to be found. Some of it, perhaps even a lot of it is bullshit, but if one really wants to know what’s happening, Telegram is one of the better places to find out, though it takes judgment and discretion. There are certainly Telegram channels which are far more accurate and honest than any major Western press outlet, just as there are those that are sewers of propaganda and lies.

France claims the arrest is because Telegram doesn’t moderate in line with EU law, which is probably true. The laws, however, are bad laws which make freedom of speech essentially impossible. The idea of misinformation has been weaponized to mean “what the government says is true” and since most governments are lying about both wars, well…

As Truman said, “I don’t give them Hell. I just tell the truth about them, and they think it’s Hell.”

Telegram is one of the few places left which somewhat lives up to the promise of the early internet of a place without censors or gatekeepers, where anyone could have their say. It’s understandable that governments and powerful people don’t want that, before the internet you could only be heard by large numbers of the gatekeepers would let you, and mostly they don’t. Youngs don’t remember that world, but it felt like there was constantly a gag on: there could be no honest speech which wasn’t approved.

There’s no sense in pretending it’s all upside, it isn’t, but the downsides are the price of actually allowing meaningful freedom of speech. In the old days we just didn’t hear from those the gatekeepers wouldn’t let thru. Oh, there were some exceptions, but they were exceptions.

So fuck France and fuck Macron. Just another fascist neoliberal who wants to remove freedoms and use them to enable war and genocide.

As for Pavel, he made a mistake traveling in Europe. It’s a hard balancing beam he’s on. Though Russia’s currently supportive, as Telegram is a way for their side to get their message out, they haven’t always been. There’s really no major free speech country left, and the fact is that even CEOs are at the mercy of states. You need a state to protect you, and there isn’t really a trustworthy one around any more.


My writing happens because readers donate or subscribe. If you value that writing, and you can afford to, please support it.

Open Thread

Use to discuss topics unrelated to recent posts.

Kamala Makes Her Bones On Palestine

At the DNC:

“Israel always has the right to defend itself, and as president I will ensure that it has the means to defend itself against the horrors of attacks like October 7th which included unspeakable sexual violence.”

Lying and clear support of a genocide.

Harris is better domestically, but she’s toed the line on Israel.

Oh, and AOC has clearly chosen ambition over principle. She’s refused to call Gaza a genocide, and she was allowed to speak at the DNC.  It was explained to her, forcibly, I expect, the limits of how far having principles would get her and she’s made her choice and been rewarded for it.

Neither of these women have any real principles. If you’re willing to skate on genocide, you’ll skate on anything if you feel the need. Don’t think they wouldn’t do the same thing to Americans if it came to it.


My writing happens because readers donate or subscribe. If you value that writing, and you can afford to, please support it.

How Europe Could Reinvigorate Their Economy

Every once in a while it’s important to do a policy piece, to show how society could work if we wanted to do the right things. Not because I think anyone in the West will implement enough good policy to matter, but to show that it is possible.

Back at my last corporate job I did a major workflow redesign. In the notes to management, along with the technical details were two highlighted lists. I noted that in order to receive the benefits of the change:

  1. Do these things, and;
  2. Don’t do these things.

Management appears to have reversed the lists. I left not long thereafter, and I was one of only two people who understood the entire workflow of the department. (I accept plenty of the blame, I didn’t play politics well or understand the sheer cupidity of management. I should have understood the second at least.)

The point is that policy often requires a number of actions to be taken, and that opposing action not be taken. You can’t just pick and choose: policy actions must support each other.

Big Picture On The European Economy

Europe is in decline.

  • Energy costs are too high for their heavy industry and many modern internet and computer technologies.
  • They are not in play when it comes to scientific and technical research.

  • They don’t produce significant raw or refined resources compared to other regions, with the single exception of basic agricultural crops, and the end of AMOC will smash European agriculture, probably sometime between 2025 to 2075;
  • The Chinese are pulling ahead in major export fields, like automobiles;
  • They import much of what they need, and pay for it with exports;
  • They aren’t creating a lot of new companies with new products and are, generally, falling behind in old technology;
  • Much of their industrial base is moving out of Europe (Germany, mainly). Much of that to the US.
  • Their cost structure is too high,

European prosperity was based on being able to sell advanced tech to less-developed country. Until recently, if you wanted that tech you could get it from Europe, the US, or other Western allies like Japan, Taiwan and South Korea. But now that tech can be bought from China, who almost never sanction, don’t lecture and sell and finance for less while not telling less-developed countries how to run their internal economy.

The IMF was the main economic enforcer in Western hegemony. These austerity policies in developing countries were generally a direct result of IMF requirements, or undertaken due to general financial pressure:

But this ability to force the third world into selling cheap resources to the West in exchange for Western tech and finance is coming to an end. Burkini Faso recently declined an IMF loan which was contingent on austerity measures, for example.

So Europe is in serious decline, and the structure of the world economy is moving from one designed to support it to one that no longer needs it. To put it in market terms, they’re actually going to have to compete again, and can’t keep coasting on advantages created generations ago.

Like this lists I produced for my ex-bosses, the policies which follow are intended to work in concert. Each of them is required, not optional. It will be obvious that his wish list is politically impossible, which is part of why European decline will continue.

End Austerity

Europe still has a fair bit of room to maneuver. They produce plenty of food and they still have a fair bit of industry left. Austerity needs to end. Government needs to spend. What it should do is arrange that spending to be used mostly on internal goods: if you give money to people for food, you want them to buy what Europe produces. Domestic production must be ramped up for what people and companies need and the necessary tariffs, barriers and subsidies put in place so that government spending mostly creates European demand. (Many further policies are based around making this happen.)

End Neoliberal Taxation

This means high marginal tax rates on income, including corporate income. High estate taxes. High corporate taxes on profit not reinvested. End all stock buybacks and stock options and end the doctrine of shareholder supremacy.

Institute excess profit taxes on all old products, probably basing profit levels on 2019. New products will be allowed to make higher profits, perhaps as much as 30%, with the amount of time dependent on how new they are. A product which is only a minor upgrade or alteration will not qualify.

Understand that government’s job is to create positive externalities. Government can fund actions, like good education and health and industrial subsidies because it doesn’t care who makes money from them. But this is only true if it recaptures that money from whoever is making lots of money. You let ordinary people keep most of their income but you take most of the money back from winners, then plow that money into further policies which create positive externalities.

So high marginal tax rates are necessary to run good industrial and social policy.

You also need to ensure that companies are using their profits to reinvest into the business, especially with reference to creating new products.

While you’re at it, you must put an end to moving money offshore to avoid taxation. No significant amounts of money moves outside of Europe without being taxed first. Criminal sanctions for anyone who tries and anyone who makes it possible.

End Sanctions and Sanctimony

Unilaterally end all sanctions against China and other countries, including Russia. You need their cooperation to fix your economy. Stop lecturing other countries on human rights, unless they reach severe heights like genocide.

Cut deals with China and Russia

From Russia you need cheap resources. Force the Ukraine war to an end, fix the pipelines and be good business partners.

China’s a harder nut: China is now ahead of Europe. What Europe needs is deals to allow it to keep some of its advanced areas. To get these deals they’re going to need to let China into the European market in other areas. Where Europe is behind, but wants to catch back up (electric vehicles, for example) they should bargain for branch plants in exchange for market access.

End Imposed Third World Austerity and Forgive Debt

Since the ability to coerce the third world is ending relationships will have to fairer. Forgive most of their debt, get rid of the IMF as it now exists and reform the World Bank. Cut deals for needed resources without requiring control over internal politics. Europe now has to compete with China to buy what it needs from the third world and thus will need to offer actual good deals. An end to third world austerity will also lead to better markets for any European goods.

Reform World Trade Laws and Learn How to Tariff and Subsidy

Europe will need to produce what it can domestically because it isn’t going to be able to buy much of what it needs from foreign countries. To make European goods competitive will require tariffs and subsidies. This will have to be negotiated with other countries and if Europe wants to do it, they have to allow others to do it as well.  The idea that “foreign made” is cheaper is only true if you have enough money to buy foreign made and remember that they have to want your currency. The Euro is going to be worth less and less until or if Europe creates enough tech that others must have and can’t get cheaper elsewhere.

If you can’t reform the WTO and so on, then leave and make a new organization or bilateral treaties, especially with China.

And get rid of almost all ability for private companies to sue countries for domestic laws. Countries need to have policy freedom and other than branch plants and so on Europe will require that most business is domestic.

Reduce the Cost Structure

Economic rent must be hunted down and killed. Landlords should make a decent living but not get rich. Housing should be turned into a utility: relatively cheap and easy to afford. (Some European countries are close to this already, some aren’t.) High returns on financial games must be ended: move to public (postal) banking. End high returns on financial companies. Break up the big financial firms, and make the new smaller banks and finance companies loan to new businesses. End stock market bubbles and enforce 50s style financial regulation.

Where utilities, roads, trains and so on have moved into the private sector, nationalize them.

As a general rule no one gets wealthy without creating new products for export or creating products which reduce the need to import, and billionaires become a thing of a past.

Kill Admin Bloat

Pull out your favorite admin bloat chart, look at what the administrative percentage was back in the 60s, and aim for that. The teeth to tail ratio needs to become much higher. If you aren’t doing the actual work of an organization, what you do to support it must be actually necessary. In general to receive subsidies you must reduce this bloat or your funding is cut off. There are a lot of subsidies already and in such a regime there will be much more.

We don’t want to be paying for useless jobs.

Reform tax codes to make them far simpler. Go thru the extensive regulations Eurocrats love to much and change most of them to ends, not means, then hire lots of inspectors and auditors. “We don’t care how you achieve the following environmental or workplace safety metrics, but we will check to see if you do and if you don’t we’ll fine you first (actual decision makers, not the companies), then put you out of business and if you hurt people, put you in prison.”

End Corporate/University Research Partnerships

University researchers should be government funded. Corporations who want product research should pay for it themselves, and generous subsidies should exist.

Fix Universities and Colleges

A lot of this comes ending admin bloat. Start there. Faculty should teach, some should research as well as teach and faculty must be forced to take control of universities again, with significant power for students. Administrators must have no significant policy power.

Academic publishing as it exists now must end. All academic publishing must be free and online.

All patents that are a product of government funded research are free for domestic use and available for foreigners with a fee.

Academics must no longer be judged based on volume of research. Their work must actually be read, those who hire or promote them must sit in their classes and witness their teaching. Replication of results must be emphasized and funded.

Research funds must be spread around far more, with fewer and weaker “principal researchers.”

Ties with advanced universities in foreign countries must be emphasized and student exchanges encouraged. Yes, this means China, which has most of the world’s best universities for science and technology now.

Kick NATO out and Form a European military

If you want to avoid further forced centralization form it from national units. Europe needs to make policy America isn’t going to like, it can’t do that while occupied.

Force the US to reduce embassy staffs by 90% and remove all US NGOs and similar organizations.

Same reasons. As the joke runs, “why doesn’t America have coups? Because it doesn’t have an American embassy.” America has too much influence in Europe. Reduce it.

Vastly reduce lobbying

Entrenched interests can’t be allowed to control government

Allow national subsidies to Mitigate the Effects of the Euro

For some countries the Euro is too high, and that makes their industry uncompetitive. For others it is too low and this gives industry a subsidy. Allow countries to subsidize industry to make up the difference if necessary and perhaps tax countries which are benefiting.

Make Creating New Companies Easy

Easy business loans, easy registration and removal of barriers of industry are key here. The policy of regulation by results will also help, since it reduces the massive burden of endless regulation with a simple “make sure you’re meeting our regulatory goals.” Subsidize chosen industries and make those subsidies easy to get, but audit for results and cut off those who aren’t making it.

Subsidize new companies, reduce their subsidies over time.

Make bankruptcy easy, frequent and painless. If a company fails, it fails. You keep your home and enough money to get by on for a couple years.

Final Remarks

We could go on, or each point could have its own full article, in many cases an article many thousands of words long. There’s little point in doing all that work now, since implementation is impossible. But it’s important to lay down the marker that good policy is possible and to show, generally speaking, what it would look like.

By the time Europe is willing to consider good policy its position will be far worse and digging out of the hole (when in a hole, stop digging) will be far harder. The most likely outcome is that Europe returns to being what it has been for most of history: a backwards peninsula on the edge of Eurasia, largely meaningless to anyone but themselves.

The world is changing, in huge ways, bigger than any changes since the industrial revolution, most likely even bigger than those. Europe is no longer the world’s leader, nor is it any longer the favored vassal of a super-power. It can adapt or see an end to the European garden.

So for it is choosing to see an end to the “garden.”

So be it.


My writing happens because readers donate or subscribe. If you value that writing, and you can afford to, please support it.

America’s Responsibility For The Gaza Genocide

Let’s keep it simple. From retired IDF general Yitzhak Brick:

“All of our missiles, the ammunition, the precision-guided bombs, all the airplanes and bombs, it’s all from the U.S. The minute they turn off the tap, you can’t keep fighting. You have no capability. … Everyone understands that we can’t fight this war without the United States. Period.”

Note the source here is a pro-Israeli one. Brick goes on to say:

Brick went on to explain that President Joe Biden’s demand that Israel permit “humanitarian aid” to enter Gaza means that he is demanding that Israel keep Hamas fully supplied with food, water and fuel.

His demand that Israel minimize Palestinian civilian casualties endangers IDF soldiers and renders the expansion of the ground offensive into central and southern Gaza, where the bulk of Hamas’s force is now located, almost impossible to carry out

So Brick isn’t putting responsibility on the US because he’s against the war or the atrocities. He’s all in.

The genocide is not possible without America’s support. That makes Biden and any politician who isn’t willing to stop sending Israel weapons and ammunition 100% a participant. If I supply the gun without which a murder cannot happen, knowing that it will be used for murder, I am directly responsible for the murder.

If Harris is not willing to cut off the supply of weapons and ammunition, she is not against the genocide, no matter how much she bewails the deaths.

And not just the deaths. It has become undeniable that Israel is systematically torturing and raping Palestinians, most of whom are non-combatants.

Palestine is the moral litmus test of the day, just as Iraq and South African apartheid were in their day. Eventually everyone will either pretend they were against it, or mea-culpa “how could I have known?”

But just as with Iraq, everyone who wanted to know, knew.

You’re either against genocide, rape and torture or you aren’t and there are no excuses which make any of it acceptable.


My writing happens because readers donate or subscribe. If you value that writing, and you can afford to, please support it.

Intelligence v.s. Judgment v.s. Creativity

There’s a lot of worship of intelligence in our society. Some of it is justified but much isn’t.

I’m reasonably intelligent: I’m at the level where I’m startled if someone is much smarter than I am; it doesn’t happen often.

But it does happen. There are people who make me feel stupid.

Intelligence is essentially two things: ability to perform mental operations, and speed of operation. A smart enough person can perform operations a less smart person can’t; can more swiftly learn how to do operations available to both, and processes faster.

Intelligence at its highest levels leads to polymaths: people who have mastered multiple subjects. All that speed matters.

Generally speaking, though, a smarter person will just get to the same conclusion a stupider person who knew the same things would get to faster. Think the kid at the front of class putting his hand up first.

Intelligence is not judgment or creativity.

Creativity is the ability to come up with new ideas or new combinations of ideas. Intelligence is a multiplier for creativity: the faster you perform mental operations the more ideas you can come up with, but if you don’t have creativity to multiply by, intelligence matters little.

Plenty of creative people are not at the highest levels of intelligence, especially if the type of creativity is largely artistic. But even many extremely intelligent scientists are just grinds who rarely come up with anything new: they work thru the implications of other people’s ideas and the current scientific paradigm in their field.

Judgement is the ability to know what ideas and mental operations are useful and appropriate. People without judgment apply the processes and paradigms they have learned and come up with “correct” answers which are wrong in the real world, or which are harmful.

For the paradigm of this think Larry Summers. Brilliant, but no judgment. He’s a reliable indicator of what you shouldn’t do because he applies the economic paradigm without any judgment, and since economics is a crap discipline to start with, being based on faulty axioms, he produces very intelligent garbage results. He’s a GIGO (garbage in, garbage out) machine.

Judgment tells you what old and new ideas are fruitful and what they’re fruitful for. Ideas are tools, you have to use the right ones for the job. World system analysis is worthless for day trading. Marxist class systems don’t explain societies well where the major cleavages are not along class lines, and so on. (Although they often claim to.) Keynesian economics doesn’t deal well with supply issues: it’s demand related, since that was the problem Keynes was dealing with at the time.

Intelligence is a multiplier for judgment, but if you have bad judgment, intelligence makes you more likely to get the wrong answer. Intelligence is jet fuel for foolishness.

Intelligence without judgment leads to ideas which fail to achieve their goals.

Intelligence without creativity leads to fast orthodox solutions.

Intelligence without creativity or judgment leads to new foolish ideas.


My writing happens because readers donate or subscribe. If you value that writing, and you can afford to, please support it.

Page 55 of 436

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén