The horizon is not so far as we can see, but as far as we can imagine

How To Stop Deliberate Fouling of Aquifers by Frackers

Yup:

Industry illegally injected about 3 billion gallons of fracking wastewater into central California drinking-water and farm-irrigation aquifers, the state found after the US Environmental Protection Agency ordered a review of possible contamination.

According to documents obtained by the Center for Biological Diversity, the California State Water Resources Board found that at least nine of the 11 hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, wastewater injection sites that were shut down in July upon suspicion of contamination were in fact riddled with toxic fluids used to unleash energy reserves deep underground. The aquifers, protected by state law and the federal Safe Water Drinking Act, supply quality water in a state currently suffering unprecedented drought.

Now.  Will anyone go to jail for this?

No.

Did they save a lot of money doing this, and therefore make money?

Yes.

Will they continue doing it?

Yes.

What will stop this sort of thing from happening?

Sending senior executives, CEOs and board members to maximum security prisons, after impounding all their assets under criminal forefeiture laws, thus forcing them to rely on public defenders.  Prosecute them under RICO statutes to make sure you sweep the executive suite.)

(No, I don’t approve of criminal forfeiture laws as they exist right now (seizure before guilt is proved), nor do I approve of RICO.  But if they’re being used against ordinary people, they should be used against the executive class.  Best way to get them repealed, too.)


If you enjoyed this article, and want me to write more, please DONATE or SUBSCRIBE.

Previous

The Coming Global Recession and the Remaking of the World

Next

How Ebola Aerosolized in Pigs Could Kill Millions

15 Comments

  1. Monster from the Id

    Of course, the chances of any of that happening are roughly the same as my chances of becoming the next Emperor of Japan.

    Accountability is for us peasants, not our neo-feudal lords and their high-ranking servants.

    The USA is governed by the Capitalist Shahada: “There is no god but Mammon, and Ayn Rand is his prophetess.”

    I realize Ian knows all of this already; I’m merely venting.

  2. (No, I don’t approve of criminal forfeiture laws as they exist right now (seizure before guilt is proved), nor do I approve of RICO. But if they’re being used against ordinary people, they should be used against the executive class. Best way to get them repealed, too.)

    Agree 100% with this!

  3. come now! we know that this will stop! just as soon as the profits do.

  4. Lisa Formally OldSkeptic

    Looks like Saudi Arabia riding to the rescue. With it deliberately driving down oil prices, that’s the end of the (unprofitable and overloaded by debt) fracking industry in the US.

    Looks like SA is going all out to hammer all other oil producers in the world. Obvious victims are Russia, Iran, etc. But the US tar sands and oil fracking ones are right in the spotlight, as well as US deep water oil production too.

    With friends like these….. Looks like they have got fed up with US politicians banging on about ‘the energy revolution’ they are having and have decided to do something about it. Even a year of sub $90 oil (let alone sub $80) will pretty much end the industry.

    Wonder how long SA can keep it up though?

  5. Gee

    SA can keep it up for as long as the Viagra stock holds. Which is quite a long time and won’t require medical attention. THeir breakeven budgeted oil price is around $85 a barrel or so depending on who you ask, so the $80 floor is no coinkydink. At slightly under breakeven, they have pretty massive reserves with which to keep feeding their also massive infrastructure spending plans for the next few years. They can pretty easily take two years to destroy fracking, etc, and then slowly start let the price rise. What I dont know is how easy it is to start and stop fracking, and, once stopped, now that it is clear what weapon is in the SA pocket, would they risk starting up again knowing they can get whack-a-moled.

  6. Gee

    That said…there is a wide range of production costs on fracking wells, from what Ive seen ranging from $60 ish to $100 per barrel. So the marginals will get killed off first, there will be a lot of consolidation, and its unclear how all that will play out. It may not obliterate the industry, but it will at least clip it, and create a heck of a mess if turns out to have been more of a ponzi than we realize with the decline rates as they are and the best wells likely already tapped.

  7. Mary Margaret McCurnin

    Funny, how SA might actually save some parts of the environment here in the good old USA like the Atlantic Coast, Gulf of Mexico(what is left of it), the MS River, and maybe the rest of the central valley of CA. But think of the pollution pouring into the atmosphere from the autos running on cheap gas. The auto industry is already selling more gas guzzlers since the drop in oil prices.

    More evidence that humans are crazy fools.

  8. Gee

    My comment probably doesnt make a lot of sense, since my prior one got moderated out of existence. Sorry Ian – was just being silly but also being serious. I’ll try to stick to the latter going forward. My point was that Saudi breakeven oil price is (depending upon whom you ask) about $85 or so….so yes, they can push oil to $80 for a good long while, as they have pretty massive FC reserves, and even running a modest deficit they could could continue to buy off dissent via their public infrastructure plans, public sector wage hikes, etc. They likely only need to hold oil around this point for two years to crush a large slice of fracking, tar sands, Venezuela, etc, and they can easily manage that with respect to their budget. What I’m unclear about, is, if fracking is largely forced to shut down, how quickly can it be restarted, and at what cost, and, would anyone, given that they know SA has the Hank Paulson bazooka in its pocket.

  9. Dan H

    the stats on well failure presented in Gasland II are the definition of terrifying

  10. guest

    how quickly can it be restarted, and at what cost, and
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    A lot depends on the economy. Some places on the internet say fracking and tar sands are already unprofitable and require nearly as much energy inputs as the energy outputs, so that it is basically a ponzi scheme, raising cash flow from investors desperate for the illusions of profits in a zero interest investment environment.

    With the world economy wobbling some more, don’t count on consumers to pick up the slack in the vehicle miles department, Mary Margaret McC. Fewer jobs mean less commuting, less vacation travel, etc., even if a few jerks at the top can afford huge SUVs. And let ebola get a toe hold outside of Africa, and you can kiss the airline and cruise ship industries goodbye too (norovirus schmorovius).

    Instead of burning itself out in a huge blaze trying to extract every last hydrocarbon fuel, some predict we could see the energy industry slowly extinguish itself from a vicious cycle of lack of demand and lack of investment.

  11. Phoenician in a time of Romans

    Remind me again – if a Muslim who said unkind things about America injected toxic chemicals into drinking water, what would happen to them?

  12. goingnowhereslowly

    I know a bit about hydrofracking and disposal wells–it would be best if I don’t say how–and would like to make a few clarifying points about the RT source article.
    First, these wells are formally known as Class II underground injection control wells (UICs). All UICs are required by federal law (Safe Drinking Water Act) to be physically isolated from underground sources of drinking water, meaning they shouldn’t have been anywhere near this aquifer. The California Department of Conservation is in charge of permitting UICs in California, and EPA is responsible for making sure California does its job.
    Second, the main pollutants identified in the article–arsenic, thallium, and nitrates–are not chemicals commonly used in hydrofracking. The arsenic and thallium could have gotten into the aquifer from the UIC well if they were present in the formation that was fracked, and came back up with the flowback water. But they could have gotten into the aquifer from other industrial wastewater, if industrial wastewater were illegally injected into the well. The nitrates probably had nothing to do with fracking but came from excess fertilizer leaching in or contamination with sewage or livestock waste.
    It turns out that the major pollutants in flowback water are usually salts–not exotic carcinogenic metals or hydrocarbons–but very, very effective in destroying water resources for agricultural or drinking water use. There were excess salts in some of the wells tested in this case.
    Fracking clearly is not benign; it has hugely revved up a wide variety of environmental stresses and the companies involved have gotten away with ruining ordinary families and their land for far too long. But fracking is not a unique evil either, and even if the
    Saudis’ predatory pricing gambit stops it in its tracks, groundwater in California and elsewhere is still at risk, and attention should still be paid. The punishments suggested would be a start.

  13. Sam Adams

    The Saudis will destroy the competing energy industries: renewables and shale gas/oil. Once destroyed, raise prices to recoup the initial cost plus whatever they can gouge. Old story, been the way in the oil industry since Rockerfeller, Carnige and Gould. Americans just don’t remember thier history.

  14. Lisa Formally OldSkeptic

    Yes Sam (et al) it is an amazing move, especially at this time. There is a lot going on in the whole economic/resource/energy world at the moment.

    The US starts to unwind ‘Quantitative Easing’ (ie money printing for the Banks and elites), China shafts (very cleverly) Australian coal exports to them, the US (though it has slipped off the radar right now) trying to get the EU to end oil and gas purchases from Russia, SA ‘going all in’ to hammer competing oil production (including running around the EU to try and sign up countries for long term ‘sweetheart’ deals).

    So WTF is going on? Is this just the usual chaos of an empire breaking up, where the satraps are all trying to position themselves for their best advantage for when it goes, while those in the empire’s crosshairs (like China) are working hard to pick off the US’s peripheries (kill Australia?) and weaken/collapse it even faster?

    Because none this makes any real strategic or economic sense for just about anyone (except Russia and China).

    Take one example: Does Turkey really think that after IS has killed off the Syrian Kurds and taken over Syria (which seems their ‘wet dream’ wish) wiping out all the Shias, Christians, etc , then it will then roll over and let Turkey take over, touching forelocks as they do to their betters, as the ‘new Ottomen’ create a new caliphate?

    Another: Does SA not realise, that if the US wants (even in its depleted and dying state) it can still really, really hurt it? Quick setting of SA as a ‘terrorist state’ (real easy that one) and then hammer it economically (sanctions, seizures, etc), or if they were really smart (unlikely) cut a deal with Iran to create unrest in SA’s Shia areas?

    The Best One: Israel seeming to prefer having a whole bunch of screaming, monsterous, Wahabbi Sunni Jihadists on their border than a functioning State that they have been at peace with for the last 40 years, just to get at a small Shia population in Lebanon that has stopped them grabbing the Wantani River for so long? This is ‘target fixation’ to the Nth power.

    With the exception of Russia (maybe Iran) and China you are seeing a lot of people doing some strategically questionable things at the moment, with a heck of a lot of ‘what could possibly go wrong’ potential.

    Popcorn time….

    Just a wicked thought, the US oil industry has been taking a hammering from the the Wall St dominated US Govt (Russia sanctions) and now SA. Given their political clout it will be interesting to see if we get an ‘oil President’ in 2016.

  15. Bas

    Well I guess a man can dream…

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén