The horizon is not so far as we can see, but as far as we can imagine

The Right of Israel to Exist and the Fresh Hell it Is Heading Towards

I’ll be plain here: As a religious ethnic state which prefers Jews, I do not grant that Israel has the right to exist. (Wonder how many subscriptions that statement just cost me?)

As a state where everyone has equal rights, it has every right to exist, and all its residents should be left in peace.

Palestinians and non-Jews like Muslims are humans. As humans, they should be treated with the same rights as every other human.

What is happening right now is that Palestinian homes are being stolen by force. When the law is used (it often isn’t), it applies one set of laws to Palestinians, and another to Israeli Jews.

Meanwhile, at al-Aqsa mosque, entirely peaceful worshipers are being gassed and beaten. One signature move is “knee on neck,” of George Floyd fame, which is how fascist cops give the middle finger to everyone decent in the world, now. There are videos of this, with millions of views.

If you are a humanist who believes in universal human rights, you cannot support the existence of Israel as a Jewish ethnic-state. It was created by taking the lands and homes of other people, and it exists by keeping those people and their descendants a second class residents, often with great violence. Nor have its crimes ever stopped.

Map Story of Palestine

Map Story of Palestine

What this map should tell you is something simple: There is no possibility of a two-state solution; there is no viable Palestine without removing large numbers of violent settlers. Those settlers would assassinate any Israeli leader who tried, and odds are the army and police would help them.

What it also tells you is that Palestinians are still being ethnically cleansed. This is not a historic crime, long or short in the past, it is an ongoing crime.

 Two-state is dead. There are only two ends to this: The Israelis finish ethnic cleansing the Palestinians, or they give them full rights and citizenship and end the Jewish-ethnic nature of Israel.

It is very odd that cleansing Palestinians is, sub-voce, justified by the Holocaust. Being genocided does not give a free “ethnic cleansing” card, and if it did, one presumes it would be against those who genocided you. I, as someone of primary Irish descent, would presumably get one against the English (and, Lord, if anyone deserves it, the English are high on the list, but I will not descend to their level and kill vast swathes of innocents).

If Israel was “justice” for the Holocaust, then it should have been created by ethnically cleansing Germans out of Prussia.

But the issue here is that Israel is a religious-ethnic state where almost half the population (and yes, Palestinians are ruled primarily by Israel, not by the Palestinian Authority or Hamas, don’t make me laugh) are not even second-class citizens. It is an apartheid state, just not yet one with percentages as bad as those in South Africa.

Israelis of good conscience or good sense, know the horror they now face. What lessons did they learn from the Nazis? Who have they become? What is the state of their souls, should souls exist?

Van Creveld, an Israeli military historian and hardly a bleeding heart:

They [Israeli soldiers] are very brave people… they are idealists… they want to serve their country and they want to prove themselves. The problem is that you cannot prove yourself against someone who is much weaker than yourself. They are in a lose-lose situation. If you are strong and fighting the weak, then if you kill your opponent then you are a scoundrel… if you let him kill you, then you are an idiot. So here is a dilemma which others have suffered before us, and for which as far as I can see there is simply no escape. Now the Israeli army has not by any means been the worst of the lot. It has not done what for instance the Americans did in Vietnam… it did not use napalm, it did not kill millions of people. So everything is relative, but by definition, to return to what I said earlier if you are strong and you are fighting the weak, then anything you do is criminal

Israel, so far, has done great criminal acts. But yes, it has only ethnically cleansed, it has not committed genocide.

For their own sakes, I hope that Israelis will realize the precipice upon which they stand and see how they have let a combination of fear, power, and greed for a homeland convince them that a Jewish ethnic state is worth what it is costing them.

The next play is to bring down al-Aqsa mosque, and rebuild the Temple. Be very clear that that is where this is going.

May God, if he exists and is beneficient and not a monster, extend his blessings over all involved, that they see the hell they live in, and the worse hell they are charging towards. To live in peace, under just and kind laws applied evenly to all, is to live in heaven. To deny that peace or equal law, is to deny God.


(The more people subscribe or donate the more I write and the happier I am. So please consider doing so if you like my writing.)

Previous

The Inflation Spike: What it Will Do & How to Take Advantage

Next

Israel Invades Gaza

55 Comments

  1. Jan Wiklund

    Even the notoriously Liberal Human Rights Watch, with its usually very good relations to Washington, has confirmed Israel as an Apartheid state, see https://www.juancole.com/2021/05/apartheid-humanity-prosecuted.html

  2. Soredemos

    Well, there is a third option: Israel gets pushed into the sea.

    But knowing what petulant dipshits they are, if it looked like that was going to happen they’d fire off all of their hundreds of illegal nukes and turn all of the middle east into a sea of fire and radiation, probably starting WWIII.

  3. Plague Species

    McDonald lit the match to this latest conflagration. His actions emboldened Israel even more than it was previously emboldened. Note how “Jeremy” left McDonald off the list in previous postings. Why would that be, I wonder? A sure sign veiled white nationalism is in play.

    What Israel has that South Africa didn’t is deeply and effectively entrenched influence in American federal governance.

    Remember, most of the rabbis are preaching that American Jews must give fealty to Israel no matter what, so Israel is using the Judaic faith as leverage for its crimes against humanity. It is making otherwise decent Jews complicit via their tacit, and many times explicit, approval.

  4. Plague Species

    Are you joking? You let “Jeremy” spam the board with veiled white nationalism perspective towards Israel and yet my benign comment in comparison gets thrown into moderation?

  5. Astrid

    Plague Species,

    As our host had explained multiple times, he does not control what gets put into moderation because it’s an automated and necessary process to prevent getting overwhelmed by spam. I just had a comment that didn’t go through for some reason. Just because your mind comes up with ideas doesn’t mean they are automatically true. Seek help.

    I will say that Jeremy’s article, while highlighting something very problematic in American public life (dual citizenship of public officials), is so poorly researched (ordinary US citizens can hold multiple citizens too) and poorly argued that it might be intentionally trying to weaken the positions he is ostensibly supporting.

  6. Astrid

    Ian,

    I really can’t imagine this post costing you any subscriptions. You’ve touched on way too many 3rd rail topics to still have any “liberal except on Israel” goodthinker supporters left. You’re just stating a truth, the denial of which has done much to rot the US body politics.

    Israel may lose its US support in a generation, both due to decline of the US and because very few young Jewish people in the diaspora actually want to go there. The honest ones are already in open opposition. The dishonest (to themselves) ones still toe the line but I don’t see them doing more than taking advantage of their free birthright fieldtrip.

  7. Ché Pasa

    From the distance of my rocking chair, the whole thing looks like yet another provocative replay, “testing” the US and its loyalty to the State of Israel.

    Same thing happened to Obama, Clinton and Carter. But also to the Bushes One and Two and to Trump.

    The crappy little state gets into a dust up with the majority they love to oppress and massacre at will. In this case, the crappy little state run by corrupt and bloodthirsty monsters (regardless of elections, mind you) sent “security” to the Al Aqsa mosque to break up Muslim holiday worshipers — for maximum impact, of course — injuring hundreds and raining chaos across the land, spurring numerous outrages by whipped up Israelis and a predictable reaction by an uncowed and unbossed Hamas firing rockets from Gaza.

    They knew what would happen.

    So did the State Department in DC. Which has pledged undying fealty to Israel and its “right” to self defense, while simultaneously denying any such right to Arab Palestinians.

    So it’s a replay. Some dozens of Israelis will be injured, a few of whom will die. Some thousands of Palestinians will be exterminated inside and outside of Israel, and many, many thousands will be injured while many others are dispossessed and made homeless. This has happened over and over and over again primarily to prop up whatever tottering ruling clan holds power in Jerusalem.

    And it will keep happening so long as “testing” US loyalty to Israel is considered worthwhile.

  8. Astrid

    Che,

    Thanks for the explanation. So again, it’s short term political survival and advantage over any kind of long term strategy. Everytime the crappy little state does this, especially in the age of video smartphones, actually undermines their long term survival. The elites and their brainwashed populace might even believe this, since they are so insulated from the consequences of their actions for now.

  9. Jeremy

    Why is calling out the fact that US politicos have dual Israeli nationality ‘white nationalism’.

    And BTW I’m a UK jew.

  10. Jeremy

    And if you think Israel doesn’t influence our elections, then think again.
    In what kind of world is this political meddling acceptable?

    https://electronicintifada.net/blogs/asa-winstanley/video-how-israel-helped-bring-down-jeremy-corbyn

  11. Jeremy

    We have the same Israeli interfering going on in the UK as you do in the US.
    It’s endemic (or perhaps a pandemic!)

    Conservative Party Friends of Israel
    https://cfoi.co.uk/aboutcfi/

    Labour Party Friends of Israel
    https://www.lfi.org.uk/about/

    And not a single person I’ve ever asked here, has ever heard of either of these two groups.
    They are very powerful and very influential – as is AIPAC.

    Sometimes Glenn nails it:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b5xbzt-Tn0s

  12. Synthetic Yams

    Genuinely curious, given the depth of emotion commenters here seem to have invested in illegal occupations in the Near East, what is your take on the Turkish Republic of North Cyprus? Anyone?

  13. Hugh

    The Israeli political scene descended into fascism years before the US. In Israel, things start fascist and get increasingly weirder from there. Netanyahu is both fascist and corrupt. And he’s been losing control of Israeli politics . They’ve had 4 national elections in 2 years. Stealing some more Arab land and killing some more Arabs could be what would pass elsewhere for a little electioneering for Bibi to stay in power and out of jail.

  14. Jason

    what is your take on the Turkish Republic of North Cyprus? Anyone?

    We’ve been trying to get rid of our all-powerful Turkey lobby here in the U.S. for decades. There are a lot of Turks with dual citizenship and ties to the highest levers of both governments here in the U.S. and in Turkey. It’s obviously not a kosher situation.

    And the money we’ve sent to Turkey over the decades dwarfs what we send to Isra…oh wait, nevermind.

  15. Bridget

    @Synthetic Yams

    Laugh my f’in ass off.

    Yes, you’ll find a lot of Turkish billionaires declaring The Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus to be their only calling in life and lavishly funding politicians here in the U.S.

    Your Hasbara isn’t very good. Are you formal Sayan with handlers, informal, or just someone trying to do right by their beloved Israel?

    If the former, they’re listening, and I’ll tell them what they already ought to know: Synthetic Yams’ needs more training.

  16. Mark Level

    Thank you to Che Pasa for a very insightful, factually detailed comment regarding the repeated nightmares that the Palestinian populace endlessly suffers while the “international community” stands by and twiddles their thumbs (seemingly) while actually of course giving Israel the green light for ethnic cleansing. To add one detail to Che’s account, every war Israel initiates over the past decades, I have always noticed that the casualties are at a rate of at least 10 Palestinians to 1 Israeli. And (almost needless to say), of course the IDF kills mainly more civilians than actual resistance fighters. A quick look at the Electronic Intifida this morning which (alongside moonofalabama, ianwelsh.net, moderaterebels, mondoweiss, etc.) are among the more balanced and truthful media I look to for coverage of the area, shows tweets of families and multiple small children killed by Israeli bombing. War crimes, clearly. I think that Ian is very even-handed to say that the deliberate mass ethnic cleansing does not rise to the level of genocide. Technically, this may be true, because of course there are no hard-and-fast standards for what is “genocide”, any more than what “human rights” means, etc. And Blinken’s beloved “rules based order” means 2 countries, the U.S. and Israel, are completely exempted from any actual Nuremberg conventions, UN standards regarding occupation and civilians, limitations on collective punishment of populations or torture, etc. (Kind of a corollary of Ms. Helmsley’s “Only the little people pay taxes” for international relations, “Only the non-exceptional States have to follow international law and standards.) The only thing I can add to Che Pasa’s comment is how disgusting and craven the US media’s dishonesty and one-sidedness on reporting in this area are. I am kicking myself this morning for having donated to KALW the better of the Bay Area’s 2 NPR radio stations some months ago, as their news coverage was so skewed and biased. Every report started with “Palestinian rockets” and then the “response” of the poor Israelis, who of course, as Van Creveld’s statement above admits, “respond” with hugely disproportionate force against a civilian populace. The fact that Israel whipped up violent settler pogroms, often supported by local police, against vulnerable Palestinian civilians, while trying to steal the homes of Palestinians who’ve lived in areas they want for generations via legal fiat, is never mentioned, of course. Instead, KALW offered an interview with the openly racist Mark Regev, former ambassador to the US from Israel. I of course would like to believe that eventually this will end as badly (or worse) for the the Israeli ubermenschen as it did for the whites of South Africa (though economically, things improved little for the black majority in S.A.). Sadly, I despair that that is likely soon, if ever.

  17. Synthetic Yams

    @Bridget
    Laugh my f’in ass off.

    Yes, you’ll find a lot of Turkish billionaires declaring The Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus to be their only calling in life and lavishly funding politicians here in the U.S.

    Your Hasbara isn’t very good. Are you formal Sayan with handlers, informal, or just someone trying to do right by their beloved Israel?

    If the former, they’re listening, and I’ll tell them what they already ought to know: Synthetic Yams’ needs more training.

    So the issue is not one of people being brutally thrown out of their ancestral homes and replaced with settlers, so much as it is one of nationals of said occupier sinking their greedy, sinister tentacles into the media, political and banking system.
    Clarifying.

  18. Bridget

    @Synthetic Yams

    That’s actually much better Hasbara. We don’t really care about the underlying humanity, we just can’t stand “the Jews.”

    You get a star.

  19. Astrid

    Dear Hasbara trainee,

    Thank you for demonstrating technique #3 of the online disinformationalist. Your “genuine concern” about a conflict that is nothing like Israel/Palestine (and even it is, does not offer any sort of support for the Israeli position), is clarifying.

    https://cryptome.org/2012/07/gent-forum-spies.htm

  20. Soredemos

    @Plague Species

    No, this is happening because Netanyahu needs to distract from his corruption trial, as well as boost his support so he can stay in charge of any coalition government. He’s blatantly wagging the dog.

    And I won’t vouch for the validity of Jeremy’s link; claims about various politicians having dual Israeli-US citizenship have been being made for decades, with little evidence ever provided. But when I see things like Chuck Schumer openly bragging that as long as he is in the Senate he will endeavor to defend Israeli interests, that’s a big problem for me. He was elected to represent his American constituents, not a foreign power. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/schumer-im-on-a-mission-f_b_560091

    @Synthetic Yams

    The point is that the US is directly involved in Israel in a way it isn’t in Cyprus. Nice attempt at whataboutism though.

  21. Jason

    I reread Ian’s post and I can’t believe I missed this:

    Israel, so far, has done great criminal acts. But yes, it has only ethnically cleansed, it has not committed genocide.

    This isn’t helpful. These are weasel word terms used by the powerful to retain their power and to deny the powerless justice.

    The entire Zionist plan is the intentional displacement and the destruction of all facets of existing life in what was formerly known as Palestine, to be replaced by a Jewish state. This is their own literature!

    So far, close to one million Arabs of Palestine (Palestinians) have been killed and millions displaced. And the project continues.

    If we don’t have a term for this slow, deliberate displacement of a people from their ancestral land and the destruction of their entire way of life in the interest of an ethnic nation-state, in this case Jewish – then we desperately need one, so that its perpetrators can be prosecuted.

    This PBS article actually does a decent job explaining the terms and their practical application. It also mentions how the “genocide” label is studiously avoided by the U.S. because then they would have to do something. International law lacks enforcement mechanisms…

    https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/whats-the-difference-between-genocide-and-ethnic-cleansing

    I want to repeat this statement:

    it has only ethnically cleansed

    I’m sure when Palestinian parents tell their children about their history, they always end the conversation with this: “But we were only ethnically cleansed kids. We weren’t genocided. It could have been worse, so count your blessings.”

  22. Jason

    Gazan: “This sucks, but we’re only being slowly ethnically cleansed. Thank god it’s not genocide.”

  23. Plague Species

    https://foreignpolicy.com/2014/07/16/israel-and-hamas-need-each-other/

    That’s not to deny the enmity that marks the ties between Hamas and Israel, or the existential rhetoric that drives the tone of their public accusations. It’s perfectly reasonable to assume that if Israeli and Hamas leaders had one wish, it would be to destroy the other. But in the practical world of Israeli-Palestinian politics, getting rid of one another is neither achievable — nor perhaps even desirable. Indeed, because it’s not an option, Israel and Hamas have not only made do with each other’s existence, they have tried to figure out how to derive the maximum benefit from one another.

    The Israeli-Hamas bond goes back to the very inception of the Palestinian Islamist organization. Israel didn’t create Hamas in 1987, but in an effort to counter the more secular Fatah and Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) in the 1970s, it gave a variety of Islamist groups political space and leeway. It even granted an operating license for an organization created by Hamas’s founder, Ahmed Yassin. Paradoxically, Hamas’s very reason for being depended on the existence of Israel — even though its main aim was to destroy it.

    One way to look at this is as a Middle Eastern form of mutually assured destruction. Hamas cannot destroy Israel, and Israel knows that it cannot reoccupy Gaza and eradicate the Islamist organization at a cost that it is willing to bear. So each actor uses the other for its own purposes.

  24. Mr Jones

    As Jason mentioned, variations on the destruction of what the entire world knew as Palestine and its replacement with an ethnic Jewish state is found in all the Zionist writings, texts, etc. It may not be a 10-point plane, but a formal outline of intent is easily discerned and any halfway competent lawyer can make a case against Zionism such that many of its practitioners would be prosecuted, just as members of the Nazi party were and continue to be prosecuted.

    This is why they were so quick to get the “Zionism is racism” edict – agreed to by the majority of the world’s people – overturned. There cannot be even a trace of something that will establish a legal foundation for their prosecution.

    Of course, as long as they have the power they have, this will be hard to overcome, and their using language to prevent their own prosecution is another exercise of that very power.

    In the absence of power, we use ridicule and appeals to conscience.

    Shame on those who hide behind the official language of the powerful to diminish the lives of human beings who are caged before our very eyes. Shame on them.

  25. Bridget

    @Synthetic Yams

    So the issue is not one of people being brutally thrown out of their ancestral homes and replaced with settlers, so much as it is one of nationals of said occupier sinking their greedy, sinister tentacles into the media, political and banking system. Clarifying.

    This is actually decent Hasbara. You are insinuating in the readers’ minds the idea that we don’t care about the human beings involved, rather we just “hate the J…s”

    You get a star. ✡

  26. Ian Welsh

    As Astrid noted, almost all moderation here is automated; some comments, chosen by algos, are held for me to look at when I have time. Sometimes that may be soon, sometimes it can be nearly a day, depending on whether I’m online.

    A very few people are on “all mod”, but Plague Species is not.

    In fact, I’ve only ever had two people complain about being moderated all the time who were. The person who complained most about moderation, after I explained to them personally about 10 times, still did not understand that I run a plug-in to tag spam (and appears to have left the blog.)

    If I did not run a spam plug-in, each post would literally have over a hundred spam messages. You don’t want that.

  27. Bridget

    The entire framing in the mainstream and much if not most of the alternative media is wrong. They still insist that this incident was instigated by the oppressed Palestinians (in the form of, they’re all led by the ever convenient Hamas). They neglect what they’re doing to Jerusalem on the whole and what happened specifically. And they don’t investigate to uncover the fact that these ops are planned in advance and then blamed on the oppressed, as an excuse to further oppress them and continue the glorious path to Eretz Yisrael.

    Israel and its agents in the U.S. and around the world are the oppressor.

    You put someone in jail and piss on her constantly and then call her an instigator because she threw a homemade schiv made out of toilet paper and gum at you and then you – backed by your nuclear superdaddy – go back and shoot her in the groin and laugh.

    Fuck you.

  28. Jeremy

    The view we are prevented from seeing by our media:

    Gaza Fights For Freedom (2019) Full Documentary:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HnZSaKYmP2s

  29. Jeremy

    Thousands of Israeli Jews singing about revenge, chanting “Yimach shemam (may their names be erased),” dancing as a fire burns on the Temple Mount:

    https://twitter.com/simonerzim/status/1391869749303316483

  30. Plague Species

    Yes, Bridget, Hamas certainly is convenient. All the Dem leaders are defending Israel’s aggression by using Hamas’s rockets as the excuse. Hamas counters the PA, factionalizes the Palestinians and prevents solidarity and cohesion. It is a gift to Israel and its violence against Israel is predictable and easily managed by Israel and serves as a pretext for Israel to further terrorize ordinary Palestinians. Ordinary Palestinians are between a rock and hard place. No good options. Even many of those who claim to support them, do so for their own ulterior motives and not always with the best interests of ordinary Palestinians at heart.

    This topic is where Greenwald and much of his commentariat cross swords. The fascism of his commentariat shines through on this issue with their unflagging support of Israel. Glenn has yet to hold McDonald Trump to the same opprobrium he does Dem leaders related to this issue. They’re ALL bad when it comes to Israel and the Palestinians, but Trump was and is bad on massive steroids and yet Glenn, per usual, gives McDonald a pass and says “the Dems,” like Chris Farley said “the Bears” with a six inch piece of sausage lodged in his artery.

  31. Bridget

    It is a gift to Israel and its violence against Israel is predictable and easily managed by Israel and serves as a pretext for Israel to further terrorize ordinary Palestinians.

    This is straight Hasbara. It takes the responsibility off the bully. It ignores that – in addition to the monstrous historical and ongoing death, destruction, and dispossession – this specific fighting was started by Israel.

    It’s akin to the father beating the child: “You’re making me do this!” as the child tries to protect itself from the father’s beating – perhaps even by hitting back a bit, however meekly.

    Interesting that I often sense a lot of Old Testament thinking in the Zionist way of looking at a situation. Maybe it’s just an authoritarian nature in general. Who knows.

    I don’t know if this is intentional or not. PS’ response will enlighten further.

  32. Jason

    serves as a pretext for Israel to further terrorize ordinary Palestinians.

    Terrorizing civilian populations (“ordinary Palestinians” in your nomenclature) is a war crime.

    Let’s commence the proper proceedings.

  33. Jason

    I should clarify, it’s not a war crime. It’s a crime against humanity, as first established under the Nuremberg principles. These principles are evoked and hailed when they are used against officially approved enemies, to borrow Noam Chomsky’s terminology.

    The Palestinians, not so much.

    This should not be. It is blatant injustice, not to mention pure hypocrisy.

    Even absent power, the zeitgeist around Zionism and the entire Israel project can change by constantly calling out the intentional disinformation.

  34. Soredemos

    @Plague Species

    Why are you still talking about Trump? He’s not in charge anymore. And for that matter, he wasn’t the one in charge during Israel’s most brutal ‘lawn mowings’ of Gaza. This is all on Netanyahu, man.

  35. KT Chong

    But are Israelis committing “cultural genocide” on Palestinians??

  36. KT Chong

    Nevermind, “cultural” genocide is the same as “genocide”. Now it’s just… genocide.

  37. Synthetic Yams

    This is actually decent Hasbara. You are insinuating in the readers’ minds the idea that we don’t care about the human beings involved, rather we just “hate the J…s”

    You get a star.

    It is especially telling that not once did I say a single thing in defence of Israel or its actions. The fixation is what I am trying to understand here.

  38. Jules

    The fixation is what I am trying to understand here.

    I think the issue is plain to see and the fixation we should be most concerned with is the United States political class’ fixation on Israel and what feeds it.

  39. Synthetic Yams

    I think the issue is plain to see and the fixation we should be most concerned with is the United States political class’ fixation on Israel and what feeds it.

    The “United States political class” has supported all sorts of shitty regimes. Why, to pick one example, does no one question Saudi Arabia’s right to exist? Mere criticism seems to suffice. Why not in this case?

  40. Bridget

    I don’t use the “right to exist” argument. No nation-state has an inherent, perennial “right to exist.”

    At any rate, this is another Hasbara misdirection, as U.S. political support for Saudi Arabia is constantly lambasted.

    Tiny Israel receives more military equipment from the U.S. than does Saudi Arabia. This comes under the rubric of maintaining the “quantitative and qualitative edge” that may be the primary objective of Israel Lobby, though it has many raisons d’etre.

  41. Synthetic Yams

    @Bridget

    Also very telling is your inability to respond to my comments without resort to the term “Hasbara”, as if any and all questioning of your narrative could only be done at the behest of the Israeli government.
    Again, notice that I have not made one single defence in my comments of Israel or its actions.

  42. Bridget

    That was an example of bad Hasbara. It opened up further inquiry into Israel and its lobby. The objective is to steer people away, aside from the celebratory aspects. And to keep people feeling sorry for us. Now people might look into the specifics of the quantitative and qualitative aspect.

    Hell, it may lead them to the Liberty “incident” which we and our operatives have covered up so well all these years. And we certainly don’t want anyone looking closely at all the names and Israeli connections surrounding “what happened” on 9/11.

    I’m afraid I have to take a star away.

    – ✡

    Go study.

  43. Samwise the Manged

    “Why, to pick one example, does no one question Saudi Arabia’s right to exist? Mere criticism seems to suffice. Why not in this case?”

    What “right” does any nation have to exist? Nations, are, in one of the clearest definitions, merely “imagined communities.”

    The reason Israel’s “right to exist” is discussed, just like their constant of their “right to self-defense,” is because A) these are “rights” they constantly and loudly assert, and B) these are rights they unambiguously deny Palestinians.

    So yes, if Israel wants to discuss their “right to exist,” then by no means should it be forbidden to take the assertion seriously. And in agreeing with Welsh here, I would say if they think they have this “right” and the Palestinians do not, then there is no moral reason to agree with them.

  44. Jules

    @Synthetic Yams

    The original post and the entire thread are about Israel. What’s most telling is you constantly directing the conversation away from the topic at hand.

    I don’t know anything about “hasbara” and I don’t have to. It’s obvious what you are doing in the alleged interest of “just trying to understand.”

  45. Bridget

    If you don’t like the word “Hasbara” I won’t use it. Here is my post without it. The points you ignored are still valid

    I don’t use the “right to exist” argument. No nation-state has an inherent, perennial “right to exist.”

    At any rate, this is another misdirection, as U.S. political support for Saudi Arabia is constantly lambasted.

    Tiny Israel receives more military equipment from the U.S. than does Saudi Arabia. This comes under the rubric of maintaining the “quantitative and qualitative edge” that may be the primary objective of Israel Lobby, though it has many raisons d’etre.

    That said, I encourage everyone to know and understand Hasbara and how it works. I would also suggest looking into Sayanim.

  46. Jason

    We used to do Hasbara deconstruction like this over at Mondoweiss years ago, before they banned Jeff Blankfort, Gilad Atzmon, and others.

    A simple, “I thought we were talking about Israel?” can sometimes suffice to bring the proverbial elephant in the room back into focus.

    It’s fascinating to watch them. They will always take advantage of your (justified) anger, and they will take every opportunity to nitpick at verbiage, so as to avoid the crux of the problem. This is all intentional misdirection, as has been illustrated pretty well here.

    Remember: I thought we were talking about Israel.

  47. Bridget

    as if any and all questioning of your narrative could only be done at the behest of the Israeli government.

    I don’t know if you are acting at the behest of the Israeli government or not. You mimic all their defensive talking points on the issue. I’m merely pointing that out.

    I hope you continue in your earnest desire to come to an understanding of the situation.

  48. Synthetic Yams

    The original post and the entire thread are about Israel. What’s most telling is you constantly directing the conversation away from the topic at hand.

    The original post is about Israel’s right to exist. It says so right there in the title.
    I am not taking issue with any particular criticism of Israel, which you probably would have noticed had you taken a deep breath and paused before reading my comments.
    I have no more connection with or affinity towards Israel than I do any of the other 200-odd countries out there that I do not inhabit.

  49. Bridget

    The original post is about Israel’s right to exist. It says so right there in the title.

    Ian’s original post was indeed about Israel’s “right to exist” as a Jewish ethno-state, and included information specific to the topic, both historical and contemporary. The topic being Israel and Palestine and, by extension, their respective relationships to the United States.

    There were 12 comments that discussed this to varying degrees. Then you popped in with this:

    Genuinely curious, given the depth of emotion commenters here seem to have invested in illegal occupations in the Near East, what is your take on the Turkish Republic of North Cyprus? Anyone?

    Your obviously legitimate, valid concerns about the Turkish Republic of North Cyprus were addressed by commenters. Remember: Israel is the topic of conversation here. Well, it was. Because next you decided that it absolutely needs be mentioned that Saudi Arabia is a monster and the U.S. funds it, so….

    So we’re off the subject again.

    I am not taking issue with any particular criticism of Israel, which you probably would have noticed had you taken a deep breath and paused before reading my comments.

    Good. Then call your representatives and tell them to stop funding Israel or you won’t vote for them. Also tell them that AIPAC et al ALL have to register as agents of a foreign power.

    You can also mention the Turkish Republic of North Cyprus, if you so desire. Perhaps the person you’re talking to on the phone may have heard of it. You be damn sure they’ve heard of Israel.

  50. Jules

    You can also mention the Turkish Republic of North Cyprus, if you so desire. Perhaps the person you’re talking to on the phone may have heard of it. You be damn sure they’ve heard of Israel.

    What if the person on the phone is the Turkish equivalent of an Israeli Sayan? There are a lot of them too, right?

    The Turkish diaspora is huge in the U.S. and their lobby is known to be as powerful as Big Ag, Big Oil, Big Tech, and the AARP, right?

  51. The Spirit of Admiral Thomas Hinman Moorer

    Israel deliberately torpedoed our ship, blocked our radio distress signals, and then used their lobby and operatives to cover the entire thing up. That was almost 55 years ago, and their power and stranglehold on the U.S. government has grown exponentially since then.

    As I said back in 1983 when I was still with you:

    “I’ve never seen a President . . . stand up to them [Zionists]. If the American people understood what a grip those people have got on our government, they would rise up in arms.”

  52. Bridget

    Let’s look at Martin Van Creveld, the Israeli military expert and professor at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem, who Ian quoted above:

    “It has not done what for instance the Americans did in Vietnam… it did not use napalm, it did not kill millions of people. So everything is relative…”

    but

    “If you are strong and fighting the weak, everything you do is criminal.”

    Sounds good. Van Creveld also said this:

    “Most European capitals are targets for our air force … We have the capability to take the world down with us. And I can assure you that that will happen before Israel goes under.”

    Hmmm. He arrived at this insane conclusion how? Using the premise that Israel is weaker than the entire world?

    This is shades of Golda Meir – “Mother Israel” – threatening to destroy the world with nuclear weapons during an interview with the BBC. Meir was interviewed by Alan Hart:

    Hart: “Prime Minister, I want to be sure I understand what you’re saying … You are saying that if Israel was ever in danger of being defeated on the battlefield, it would be prepared to take the region and the whole world down with it?”

    Meir, “without the shortest of pauses for reflection, and in the gravel voice that could charm or intimidate American Presidents according to need” replied: “Yes, that’s exactly what I’m saying.”

    Now let’s look at Amos Rubin, an economic adviser to former Lehi terrorist and subsequent Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir. He said:

    “If left to its own Israel will have no choice but to fall back on a riskier defense which will endanger itself and the world at large … To enable Israel to abstain from dependence on nuclear arms calls for $2 to $3 billion per year in U.S. aid.”

    Using threats of violence to coerce the U.S. to pay confidence money or be wiped out. At the same time he was scaring U.S. politicians into subservience, Zionist operatives were stealing U.S. nuclear know-how. Israel got its nukes and gets more and more money every year to boot.

    Poor little Israel, surrounded by enemies through no fault of its own. It absolutely has a right to exist. The rest of the world doesn’t. But the rest of the world, especially the United States, should support Israel. This should all be obvious. And it’s all relative, remember?

  53. Rebecca

    I am not taking issue with any particular criticism of Israel

    Any particular criticism? It’s a detailing of monstrous crimes and Israel’s entire history of subterfuge. Ian included a map of the decades-long Israeli takeover of Palestine. The first post, by Jan Wiklund, linked to a Human Rights Watch report outlining Israeli apartheid. Jeremy included a video of how Israel’s operatives used their ever-handy “anti-semitism”smear to ruin a politician in the UK. That’s just the beginning.

    It’s telling that upon reading all this you construed the entire thing as merely a critical commentary against Israel. It’s much more than that.

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén