The horizon is not so far as we can see, but as far as we can imagine

Category: Europe Page 15 of 16

What’s happening in Europe is what matters: rules of the financial rich

The oligarchs have taken down two governments in the past two weeks – Italy and Greece.  The idea that the Mario Monti, the new PM of Italy, is something wonderful, is deranged.  Note that once again, neither an election nor a referendum was allowed.

If you want to save the Euro and some form of European prosperity, there is only one solution, the European Central Bank (ECB) must do what it keeps insisting it won’t do, it must buy Eurobonds from members.  And it must buy them at fixed prices.  Italian, Greek, French, German bonds will be issued at X price, and if insufficient investors want to buy at that price, tough, the ECB will buy.  If this causes inflation, great, Europe needs inflation right now.

Even France and to a lesser extent, Germany, are coming under attack.  However France is under significant attack, and Merkel and the ECB seem unwilling to really do anything about it.  France has the option to go off the Euro in a way that most other countries don’t.  The issue with going off the Euro is simple: oil prices.  You now have to buy oil with your lousy currency, which is even more worthless than the Euro.  But if you happen to control countries that have oil, like France does (for example, France is mostly in control of Libya right now, not the US), then hey, sign some long term contracts and voila.  It is not written in stone that prices must be set on open bid markets.

Which leads us to the sudden surge in the price of oil to $107 a barrel.  On the face of it, this is crazy.  Yes, the US has had a bit of a recovery, but Europe is going hard core austerity.  But this is the game the hot money is playing: they move out of bonds and into oil, out of oil and into bonds.  $107/barrel oil means the US recovery (such as it is, which isn’t much) isn’t going to last much longer.

Being rich is about being liquid when everyone else isn’t, so you can buy up assets on the cheap.  When the rich are properly under control (ie. when you keep them poor and terrified of government and the people, as they should be) they can’t create such buying opportunities, they have to wait for them, and the government makes it so that the rich can’t take too much advantage of them, because taking advantage of them means taking advantage of other people when they’re most vulnerable.

Right now the rich can and are crashing asset prices by forcing countries into austerity through attacks on their currencies and control of their elites.  They then buy up assets for fire-sale prices.  (The history of fire-sale is worth commenting on.  Crassus, the Roman Senator of the first triumvirate, had a fire fighting team.  When a fire broke out they’d go to the fire, fight off the other fire teams, then Crassus would buy the burning buildings from their owners, negotiating as they burned.  If they refused to sell, well, they lost everything.)

These attacks on currencies are deranged.  The countries are not in that much difficulty, certainly the idea that France is in enough difficulty to be under attack is crazy.  These attacks are about power: the global rich were bailed out after the crash, now they are using their hot money in attack after attack, demanding austerity, which will cause semi-permanent depression in those countries which accept it.  That allows them to buy up what they want, keeps their labor costs down, and lets them divert what money they spend on investment which creates actual real economic growth into developing countries which are cheaper for them.

But watching European leaders respond has also made clear that they are either compromised, ideologically neo-liberals or completely ineffective.  Watching the ECB insist that it won’t just buy bonds has been particularly amusing, because if the ECB won’t defend even France, the Euro is in great danger of not existing in a few years, and if the Euro doesn’t exist, neither does the ECB, which means all those central bankers will be out of jobs.  They won’t even act to save their own jobs.

All of this is crazy.  The financial elites are on a plundering spree, gleefully using their power to force entire nations into poverty, blackmailing governments into huge payouts.  Pay extra on bonds, or pay extra on oil, or hey, why not both!

The political elites are clearly either bought or completely ineffective at resisting.  If the ECB won’t buy bonds, then countries just need to leave the Euro so they can print money.  Yes, that might cause inflation and various other problems, but that is better than semi-permanent depression through austerity.

Now, what can the people do when the elites won’t allow direct referendums, and when there are elections you can only vote for parties which are all in favor of austerity?

Make them fear you.  Start as follows, which is what was done in Argentina: find their cars, those nice expensive cars, and trash them.  Every time you see someone in a suit coming from the airport, surround the car and slash the tires.

And if you’re going to riot, don’t do it in your own neighbourhoods.  Go to the parliament buildings, the bank HEADQUARTERS or to the neighbourhoods in which the rich live, and riot there.

If you insist on some form of pure nonviolence (which the European left and right don’t) then you must chain and twist tie yourselves around important areas.  Go to the headquarters and shut them down by tying yourself up to all the entrances.  Twist ties aren’t just the cop’s friends, they are yours.  Love them and learn how to use them.

The elites will only respond when they feel your pain.  And they will only feel it if you make them feel it.

Unbelievable disrespect to a black man in Britain

Watch.  Seriously, watch it.

It’s hard to know what to say, because what I’m thinking is unprintable.  Yeah, what a surprise that the riots occurred.  What a surprise.  And cracking down will make it worse, not better.  This isn’t even close to over, and it will never be over while men or women like that interviewer are in any position of influence or power. (h/t Feminist Philosophers.)

Update: a friend points out the social reasons behind the insistence that any explanation is an excuse and that anyone who “excuses” the rioters must be immediately asked if they condone the riots as if explaining is the same thing as condoning.

The insistence on not allowing an explanation reminds me of Obama refusing to “play the blame game” with reference to the Bush administration and the shutting down of discourse around the 9/11 attacks.  Any attempt to actually understand why something happened threaten the official narrative, and might cast blame blame on those in power.  That can’t be allowed, so no explanation is allowed, only condemnation.  (Ian note: Remember all the nonsense about how the 9/11 hijackers were cowards?  They were many bad things, they weren’t cowards.)

The monopoly of violence and simple solutions to supposedly insoluble problems

One of the interesting things happening in Britain is the formation of ad-hoc groups for neighbourhood defense.  People have noticed that the police can’t defend them, and have decided to defend themselves.

This it is not a good thing for the State, which is why the police are strongly against it.  This is potentially the beginning of the breakdown of the monopoly of state violence, and the beginning of the creation of militias.  Normally, of course, I’d be aghast at the creation of militias.  They lead to nasty sectarian strife, etc… and if they take off, that’s exactly what will happen.

But what they also are is a crack in the social contract between state and citizens, an acknowledgement that the State can’t defend its own ordinary people.  And as you walk down this path, citizens start questioning their support for the State, period — whether in taxes, or in obedience to the State’s law.

Normally, again, this is a bad thing.  Heck it’s a bad thing here, but just as with the riots it is a natural reaction to the current situation.  When the State doesn’t do its job properly, whether that’s running the economy for everyone’s benefit, not just a few; or whether that’s maintaining the basic monopoly of violence (which includes basic social welfare so that the designated losers of the system don’t resort to uncontrollable violence), people start opting out.

States which don’t perform their basic functions become failed states.  There are a lot of ways to get there, but one of them is to allow the highest inequality in the developed world to exist in your capital (sound familiar?).  Those people lash out, you can’t repress them effectively anymore, others step up to do what should be your job.

Those who say there is no solution are, as usual, full of it.  There is a solution, and it is obvious.  Britain had plenty of money for the Iraq War, had and has plenty of money for Banker salaries and a housing bubble.  A chunk of that money could have easily made sure this didn’t happen, but the choice was made to have rich bankers and bomb Muslims: those were Britain’s priorities.

But if you wanted to fix it, first you clamp down hard (you now have no choice, because you didn’t care about these people), then you offer them a future.  You basically give everyone who wants a job, a job, put ex (or current) sergeants and corporals in charge, move any non-married men and women out of the city, and put them to work fixing and building things. There are always roads and buildings to be repaired, ditches to be dug, farmers who need help and so on.   You hire out of work tradesmen, and they teach them skills.  You pay them decently, you feed them, you house them, you give them skills.  After 4 or 5 years, you start putting them back into the private work force, and you subsidize their first job.

This isn’t rocket science, it is dead obvious.  Yes, it is expensive, but it is less expensive than the Iraq War or bankers bonuses.  And it is a hundred times more humane, and will prevent further occurrences while improving race relations, your economy, your tax base and you workforce.

When people say there are no simple solutions they are, in the current context, almost always full of shit.  What they mean is that there are no simple solutions which are socially acceptable either to the governing class or to society as a whole.

I think the oligarchs are overplaying their hand

In particular the Greek “bailout” was a mistake.  A horribly punitive measure, with virtually the entire “Socialist” party voting for it, it wasn’t a bailout of Greece, but a bailout of investors.  As part of the response, the Greek ministry of finance was set alight.

The oligarchs, by making peaceful revolution impossible, have, as Kennedy pointed out, made violent revolution inevitable.  Since democratically elected representatives are more concerned with doing the will of the rich, rather than the public, and since there is no party willing to do the will of the population (or even live up to their own principles, a socialist party voting for an investor bailout is not socialist), my expectation is that during the next bailout (and another one will be needed), that what representatives will be killed, to get through to them the message that no matter what the rich are offering, or threatening, there is a price for voting against the interests of the majority of the population.

Oh, and I notice that the prosecutors admitted the case against Strauss-Kahn was falling apart after his successor as IMF president was appointed and the Greek bailout passed.  Immediately after, even though the prosecutors knew it was weak before then.

Word is he was opposed to the Greek bailout, by the way.

What a remarkable coincidence.

They may have just elected him President of France.

Looting Greece while the Greeks Riot

So, apparently EU finance ministers are encouraging Greece to speed up privatization.  Which is to say, let themselves be looted faster, and transfer public goods into private hands at firesale prices.  Meanwhile, the Greeks themselves continue to riot in all the wrong places.  Folks, if you’re going to riot, go riot where the politicians and bankers are.  March on their mansions, and have your fights with the cops there. As long as it’s you fighting the cops someplace else, they don’t care.  Your master class, who refuse to pay their taxes or to tax each other, will not get serious about anything else other than paying themselves and their foreign friends by looting your country until something more important than money is on the line.

In governmental terms, yes, Greece should restructure.  Roll it all over into 100 year bonds at 1%, and refloat your own currency.  If investors don’t like that, tell them they can have that or nothing.  Slap on capital controls and let everyone know that you will hunt to the ends of the earth any of your rich who try and take capital out of the country.  Start actually taxing the rich.  If they can’t take it, they can leave, without their capital.

Off to London

for a week, in a couple weeks. This will be the first time I’ve visited England, since, oh, about 1978.  What I remember about that trip: Southampton row houses, a nice open air book market, and Trafalgar square.

So, for those of you who have been to London more recently, or lived (or live) there, thoughts and recommendations?

European leaders draft a “competitiveness” treaty meant to lower wages and cut pensions

No, I’m not kidding. It includes:

  • a debt brake which will stop countries from deficit spending beyond a target;
  • automatic monitoring which can force pension cuts;
  • a requirement to monitor wages and productivity and to then lower wages if they rise “too quickly”

Every one of these are anti-worker.  The last is a modern version of the bankers obsessions in the 80s and 90s – wage push inflation, which was the idea that inflation is primarily caused by wages rising faster than inflation, so when they do, you must strangle them.  This was a stupid idea at the time, it is even stupider now, when the main inflation problems are commodity price (energy, food, others) driven, and exacerbated far more by huge pools of liquid money at the top than by ordinary citizens having pensions and good wages.

But ultimately the choice is simple: you either tax the top at very high progressive rates or you take it out of everyone else.  Since the rich have more control over the political apparatus than the middle and working classes, they chose to strangle everyone else, rather than themselves.

It’s them, or you.  They’ve chosen you.

You don’t always get what you vote for

but you sure don’t get what you don’t vote for.

Fianna Fáil, the party in power for 20 of the past 23 years, faces a drubbing in Ireland’s general election on February 25, with Fine Gael, the other centre-right party, appearing to pick up support rather than the left-of-centre Labour party or more radical alternatives.

Guess the Irish are like Americans, they need to suffer a lot more before they get the point.  Of course, to be fair, the left parties didn’t provide a clear different option, either, so eh, they don’t deserve to win.

Meanwhile a friend just emailed me about Wisconsin.  I’m happy people are protesting, but the governor said, long before he was elected, that he intended to break public sector unions.  He’s just doing what he said he would do.  If you didn’t want it, why did you vote for it?

The Governor has a mandate.  Wisconsin voters gave it to him.

Page 15 of 16

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén