By Nat Wilson Turner
Last week at the 2025 Concordia Annual Summit in New York City, Ahmed al-Sharaa, President of the Syrian Arab Republic, appeared as one of the speakers.
The summit bills itself as “the largest and most inclusive nonpartisan forum alongside the UN General Assembly” where “top movers and shakers of today’s world to spark dialogue, promote collaboration, and collectively pave the path toward a more equitable, sustainable future.”
Al-Sharaa, is perhaps better known as Abu Mohammad al-Julani (or Al-Jawlani), the al-Qaeda veteran who formed the al-Nusra Front in 2012 to overthrow the Syrian government of Bashar al-Assad.
Here is what the U.S. State Department had to say about him when they designated him a terrorist in 2013:
Al-Jawlani is considered the leader of al-Nusrah. …
Under al-Jawlani’s leadership, al-Nusrah Front has carried out multiple suicide attacks throughout Syria. These attacks have been primarily in Damascus but the group has targeted other areas of the country as well. Many of these attacks have killed innocent Syrian civilians. Al-Nusrah’s claimed operations since the group’s December 2012 designation as a Foreign Terrorist Organization have included a January 26, 2013 suicide attack on a military base in Syria’s Quneitra Province, near the Golan Heights; a February 15, 2013 statement claiming responsibility for early February suicide attacks on regime targets in Damascus and the nearby town of al-Shadadi; and a March 20, 2013 statement claiming responsibility for two separate suicide attacks that targeted a bridge and bunker near the city of Homs on March 6, 2013.
Let’s contrast that with what former U.S. CIA director General David Petraeus had to say to al-Julani in New York. It should be noted that when Petraeus was commander of U.S. forces in Iraq, al-Julani was arrested and jailed for five years for his al-Qaeda activities.
Let’s hear how Petraeus characterized their history on stage last week:
It is obviously my privilege to interview His Excellency Ahmed al-Sharaa, president of the Syrian Arab Republic since January 2025. Born in Riyadh in 1982 and raised in Damascus, President Al-Shar rose to prominence as a rebel commander during the Syrian civil war and ultimately built and then led the force that toppled the Assad government in late 2024. His trajectory from insurgent leader to head of state has been one of the most dramatic political transformations in recent Middle Eastern history. Today he presides over nearly 25 million people in a country at a crossroads, navigating the demands of establishing security and governance and also overseeing reconstruction, the return of displaced Syrians and the challenges of reconciling deeply divided communities.
…
The fact is that we were on different sides when I was commanding the surge in Iraq. You were, of course detained by US forces for some five years including again, when I was the fourstar there.
…
Your skills again in organizing and then leading that force are hugely impressive. But despite all that you have achieved as a military leader, and it is extraordinary and now as a statesman, there are understandably some who are skeptical.
…
Mr. President, I have some sense of how tough your job is right now. How much is riding on you personally and I know you have to be keenly aware of that. The pressure has to be enormous.
When people ask me what was it like to command the surge in Iraq, I would respond by saying it was the most grinding experience of my life, but it was also the most important one. So, this next one is about you personally. How are you holding up under all this pressure? Are you getting time to do some thinking? Are you getting enough sleep at night? Again, I’ve been there and it is so very, very hard. And your many fans, and I am one of them, we do have worries.
I’m ignoring al-Julani’s answers because who cares what that monster has to say?
I’m just here to document Petraeus’ nauseating sycophancy and to provide a little more history on al-Julani and his relationship with the United States government.
It’s Ian’s annual fundraiser. We cover a lot of ground on this blog and those who read it regularly know what is going to happen before most who don’t: the end of American Empire, the end of dollar hegemony, that Russia was going to win the war, the new Hegemon China, and even minor things like Tesla’s oncoming collapse. It’d be great if you can help out (please don’t donate if your financial situation is dire.) You can Subscribe or Donate here or contact me at ian-at-fdl-at-gmail-dot-com if mail or another method would be better. (Most US cash apps do not work in Canada.)
Human Rights Watch chronicled some of al-Julani’s work in 2013 in their report “You Can Still See Their Blood” Executions, Indiscriminate Shootings, and Hostage Taking by Opposition Forces in Latakia Countryside.”
Johannes Stern summed up that report for WSWS thusly, “organised massacres in rural areas of the Syrian governorate of Latakia between 4 and 18 August 2013, killing at least 190 civilians and taking more than 200 hostages. At least 67 were allegedly executed in the operation near villages of the Alawite religious sect.”
Amnesty International took a turn with their 2016 report titled “Syria: Abductions, torture and summary killings at the hands of armed groups.”
I’ll allow Stern to sum that one up, too: “Amnesty International accused al-Nusra of torture, child abduction and summary executions. In December 2014, for example, al-Nusra fighters executed a woman on charges of adultery and stoned to death women accused of extramarital relationships. Overall, they had “strictly interpreted Sharia law and imposed punishments for alleged violations that amount to torture…”
And in case you think al-Julani has changed his stripes since taking power, please see “Syrians describe terror as Alawite families killed in their homes” (BBC) and “Hundreds massacred in Syria, casting doubt on new government’s ability to rule” (France 24).
In 2022, Aaron Mate documented the long relationship between al-Julani and the Obama/Biden regime in the U.S. for Real Clear Investigations. Some highlights:
In waging a multi-billion dollar covert war in support of the insurgency against Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, top Obama officials who now serve under Biden made it American policy to enable and arm terrorist groups that attracted jihadi fighters from across the globe. This regime change campaign, undertaken one decade after Al Qaeda attacked the U.S. on 9/11, helped a sworn U.S. enemy…
A concise articulation came from Jake Sullivan to his then-State Department boss Hillary Clinton in a February 2012 email: “AQ [Al Qaeda] is on our side in Syria.”
Sullivan, the current national security adviser, is one of many officials who oversaw the Syria proxy war under Obama to now occupy a senior post under Biden. This group includes Secretary of State Antony Blinken, climate envoy John Kerry, USAID Administrator Samantha Power, Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman, NSC Middle East coordinator Brett McGurk, and State Department Counselor Derek Chollet.
…
The outbreak of the Syrian insurgency in March 2011, coupled with the fall of Gaddafi, offered the U.S. a historic opportunity to exploit Syria’s vulnerabilities. While the Arab Spring sparked peaceful Syrian protests against the ruling Ba’ath party’s cronyism and repression, it also triggered a largely Sunni, rural-based revolt that took a sectarian and violent turn. The U.S. and its allies, namely Qatar and Turkey, capitalized by tapping the massive arsenal of the newly ousted Libyan government.
…
Although the Obama administration claimed that the weapons funneled to Syria were intended for “moderate rebels,” they ultimately ended up in the hands of a jihadi-dominated insurgency. Just one month after the Benghazi attack, the New York Times reported that “hard-line Islamic jihadists,” including groups “with ties or affiliations with Al Qaeda,” have received “the lion’s share of the arms shipped to the Syrian opposition.”….designating al-Nusra as a terror organization allowed the Obama administration to publicly claim that it opposed Al Qaeda’s Syria branch while continuing to covertly arm the insurgency that it dominated. Three months after adding al-Nusra to the terrorism list, the U.S. and its allies “dramatically stepped up weapons supplies to Syrian rebels” to help “rebels to try and seize Damascus,” the Associated Press reported in March 2013.
…
Obama administration officials continued to publicly insist that the U.S. was only supporting Syria’s “moderate opposition,” as then-Deputy National Security Adviser Antony Blinken described it in September 2014. But speaking to a Harvard audience days later, then-Vice President Biden blurted out the concealed reality. In the Syrian insurgency, “there was no moderate middle,” Biden admitted. Instead, U.S. “allies” in Syria “poured hundreds of millions of dollars and thousands of tons of weapons into anyone who would fight against Assad.” Those weapons were supplied, Biden said, to “al-Nusra, and Al-Qaeda and the extremist elements of jihadis coming from other parts of the world.” Biden quickly apologized for his comments, which appeared to fit the classic definition of the Kinsley gaffe: a politician inadvertently telling the truth. Biden’s only error was omitting his administration’s critical role in helping its allies arm the jihadis.
PressTV had more on al-Julani’s journey, and how Petraeus, in particular, has played a long-running part in the new President’s journey:
Released in 2009, he became the Emir of the Islamic State of Iraq (ISI) in Mosul, before moving to Syria in 2011 to create the Nusra Front on orders from the ringleader of the Daesh (ISIS) terrorist group Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi. A year later, al-Nusra joined other groups to form Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS).
Although the US State Department listed al-Jolani as a terrorist in 2012 and placed a $10 million bounty on him, the CIA covertly supplied weapons and funds to the HTS.
Journalist Seymour Hersh has reported that Petraeus created a “rat line” from Libya to Syria to move weapons to the HTS and other militants seeking to overthrow the former Syrian president, Bashar al-Assad.
The CIA program, called Timber Sycamore, had an annual budget of more than $1 billion. It ultimately enabled al-Jolani to oust Assad and set up an extremist regime in Syria in December.
Former French intelligence officer and analyst Thierry Meyssan stated that Petraeus continued supporting Al-Qaeda groups, including the HTS, even after resigning from the CIA in 2012 following a sex scandal.
Petraeus later joined private equity firm Kohlberg Kravis Roberts (KKR), led by billionaire Henry Kravis, which Meyssan said financed HTS for the CIA through unofficial channels.
So I guess it’s fitting that the General and the terrorist turned President are having an on-stage love-in. Al-Julani is a creation of the American state, it’s only right that he should be publicly celebrated by others of his ilk.
Other things I’m reading and watching:
- The AI Bubble and the U.S. Economy: How Long Do “Hallucinations” Last? by Servaas Storm, The Institute for New Economic Thinking
- Apple Bows to MAGA Demands on ICE Goon Tracker Apps Daily Beast
- An American Friend: The Trump-Appointed Diplomat Accused of Shielding El Salvador’s President From Law Enforcement ProPublica
- OpenAI Is Just Another Boring, Desperate AI Startup Ed Zitron
- What to expect as a Paramount bid for WBD looms CNBC
- Hedge fund billionaire pressed Treasury Secretary for Argentina bailout, Argentine media reports Popular Information
- Trump causes bipartisan alarm by turning shutdown into DOGE 2.0 Semafor
- What Is NSPM-7? Over 3,000 Nonprofits Sound Alarm on New Trump Directive Newsweek
- It’s Not Just You: Music Streaming Is Broken Now Venus Theory
- Kamala Harris’ Memoir Is the Best Argument for Why Her Type of Politics No Longer Matters Evelyn Quartz
It’s Our Annual Fundraiser. If you read us a lot, please Subscribe or Donate.
Dan Kelly
‘Al-Sharaa, is perhaps better known as Abu Mohammad al-Julani (or Al-Jawlani), the al-Qaeda veteran who formed the al-Nusra Front in 2012 to overthrow the Syrian government of Bashar al-Assad.’
Israel lends al-Nusra a hand in Syria
Overtly, the Israeli superpower of the Middle East has been keen to posture as having no role whatsoever in the four-year old devastating conflict in Syria, where all major regional and international powers are politically and militarily deeply involved and settling scores by Syrian blood.
In his geopolitical weekly analysis, entitled “The Islamic State Reshapes the Middle East”, on November 25 Stratfor’s George Friedman raised eyebrows when he reviewed the effects which the terrorist group had on all regional powers, but seemed unaware of the existence of the Israeli regional superpower.
It was an instructive omission that says a lot about the no more discreet role Israel is playing to maintain what the Israeli commentator Amos Harel described as the “stable instability” in Syria and the region, from the Israeli perspective of course.
Friedman in fact was reflecting a similar official omission by the US administration. When President Barak Obama appealed for a “broad international coalition” to fight the Islamic State (IS), Israel – the strongest military power in the region and the well – positioned logistically to fight it – was not asked to join. The Obama administration explained later that Israel’s contribution would reflect negatively on the Arab partners in the coalition.
“Highlighting Israel’s contributions could be problematic in terms of complicating efforts to enlist Muslim allies” in the coalition, said Michael Eisenstadt, a senior fellow at the American Israel Public Affairs Committee’s arm, the Washington Institute for Near East Policy.
Covertly however Israel is a key player in prolonging the depleting war on Syria and the major beneficiary of neutralizing the military of the only immediate Arab neighbor that has so far eluded yielding to the terms dictated by the US-backed Israeli regional force majeure for making peace with the Hebrew state.
Several recent developments however have brought the Israeli role into the open.
…..
The expected fallback internally of the post-war Syria would “hopefully” relieve Israel of the Syrian historical support for the Palestinian anti – Israeli occupation movements, at least temporarily.
Netanyahu on Sunday opened a cabinet meeting by explicitly using the IS as a pretext to evade the prerequisites of making peace. Israel “stands … as a solitary island against the waves of Islamic extremism washing over the entire Middle East”, he said, adding that “to force upon us” a timeframe for a withdrawal from the Israeli-occupied Palestinian territories, as proposed by Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas to the UN Security Council, “will bring the radical Islamic elements to the suburbs of Tel Aviv and to the heart of Jerusalem. We will not allow this.”
Israel is also capitalizing on the war on the IS to misleadingly align it with the Palestinian “Islamic” resistance movements. “When it comes to their ultimate goals, Hamas is ISIS and ISIS is Hamas,” Netanyahu told the UN General Assembly on September 29.
https://archive.ph/ocRrV
Mark Level
Thank you to Nat for a thorough exposition and to Dan Kelly’s deeper dive. It seems that the late Empire has wholly dropped any pretense of supporting “democracy” and prefers to work with viable, heavily militarized and openly fascistic Tribalist-Racist extremist forces: the Zionist Entity (both US parties are direct functionaries of it), ISIS-Daesh, Ukrainian Azov thugs, etc. Other less militarized “allies” like Argentina under Millei get huge bailouts when their looting hyper-Capitalist scam collapses. The MAGA CHUDs get nothing (except those who want to be ICE or Storm Troopers, fringe groups like the Proud Boys, etc.)
Also thanks to Nat for recommending the essay by Ms. Quartz on the emptiness of Kamala. While on one level her job was just shooting fish in a barrel, the fact that someone as utterly vapid and evil as Harris or Mayo Pete Buttigieg is the best “alternative” that the Dimmies can come up with shows that this country is doomed, the leadership is only about “creative destruction,” not anything else. Deliberate demolition of a failed state.
Nat Wilson Turner
Glad you enjoyed it, Mark. I’m debating reading Kamala’s book 107 days. I’ve been building to that by reading Jonathan Allen & Amie Parnes triology on the 2016, 2020, and 2024 presidential elections. Very infuriating.
Mark Level
Soon after Trump trounced Hillary I read a classic about her defeat, “Shattered: Inside Hillary Clinton’s Doomed Campaign” by 2 DC insiders, J. Allen & A. Parnes. They did a masterful job of dissecting how Hillary and her enablers hoisted themselves by their own petard and were crushed by the likes of Sideshow Donald Trump. It became a litany among her shitty staff that “We can’t have nice things,” without seemingly most, maybe any of them realizing the irony of that, when Hillary’s message “I’m with HER”, was precisely to the voters, “You can’t have nice things, no affordable health care for you peons, but count on more failed wars, more Clintonian corruption and increased NAFTA style impoverishment, alongside fake racial kayfebe & identity politics, We love non-whites and we deserve your vote just for that.” It went the way of the Hindenburg, obviously.
Her disingenuous distractions, like “Regulating the banks will not help people of color in any way, because the banks are on their side!” could only fool utter morons, who knew nothing of decades of Redlining in black and brown neighborhoods, the scamming aimed at minority communities by Shrillery’s financial backers (who she was proud of, like Chucky Schumer, “the bankers are MY constituency.”)
2016 was not far enough from 2008 to pass the smell test of that with most voters, plus she threw away billions on ineffective old school crap, TV ads, no ground game with precinct walkers, etc. The other great thing about that book was when Biden was foisted on the US by Obama and the donors, since the whole crew that failed with Hillary was back screwing things up, and handing it to Trump again with their failed wars, inflation, no relief for economic inequality and a senile, drooling ‘President’, from 2021-25!! Not to mention supporting an ongoing genocide shamelessly.
One side-note in closing. Trump’s garbage, clearly, and always has been (though he is a better pol than the likes of Bill & Hill despite all their decades of experience.) But the people suffering TDS, Trump Derangement Syndrome, do no favors for the Dems. The WORST take I maybe ever saw in “Harper’s” was an apologia for how Biden would be a good President when he came in, I think by contributing editor Kevin Baker, was that Dems HAD to go with Biden, not Sanders, because “the black community” loves and cherishes the segregationist-since the 1970s Joe Biden, the man who passed Zero Strikes laws against crack cocaine, etc. and put 2+ generations of non-white and poor people in prison over decades.
Baker’s insane deflection was meant to claim that Jim Clyburn dragging a bunch of poor black voters who he controlled with patronage in to create a primary “victory” in S. Carolina after Bernie’s early lead to coronate the miserable, shambolic Biden. When was the last time S. Carolina voted for a Dem presidential candidate in an election? I’d guess around JFK’s and LBJ’s era, not worth looking it up.
I’ve never respected Baker’s political columns since then, some months prior, March 2019, Andrew Cockburn wrote a great piece in the same magazine, “No Joe!” with clear, correct predictions of the failure a Biden admin would be based on his past prejudices and who controlled him. Baker just practices openly the political initiative to lie and deceive and gaslight for those in power. You can’t gild a turd, he was very audacious in trying to do so, “Black people love Joe Biden!!” Shameless, despicable.
Nat Wilson Turner
Shattered is the first book of the electoral trilogy I was referencing. Good review.
Thanks for pointing me at the Cockburn column on Biden, I missed it at the time. It’s a heater.
Dan Kelly
‘I’m debating reading Kamala’s book 107 days.’
Torture immediately comes to mind.
But it’s important for analaysis, I realize.
Feral Finster
Why does this surprise you?
The US/Israeli sponsorship of ISIS and Al Qaeda in Syria has long been an open secret.
Feral Finster
@Mark Level:
Sure the Biden and Clinton campaigns were cynical, but guess what!
They worked.
Biden was able to keep the neocons in office for another four years and Sanders doing his happy puppy act. HRC was also able to shiv Sanders. Even if she lost to the Orange Clown, Sideshow Donald as you so aptly put it, he proved weak, stupid and easily manipulated.
Nat Wilson Turner
@Feral Finster didn’t surprise me, did disgust me. There’s a difference.
shagggz
@Dan Kelly: “But it’s important for analaysis” – How important could it be, really? The vapidity of the title is instructive, indicative of the contemptuous rube-swill to follow. A more illuminating figure to highlight would’ve been “0 votes”.