The horizon is not so far as we can see, but as far as we can imagine

Month: March 2020 Page 3 of 4

Week-end Wrap – Political Economy – March 15, 2020

by Tony Wikrent
Economics Action Group, North Carolina Democratic Party Progressive Caucus

Health Crises

The comprehensive Ars Technica guide to the coronavirus
[Ars Technica, via Naked Capitalism 3-13-20]WORTH REPEATING: In 2018, Trump fired the entire US pandemic response team.
[Twitter,
via Naked Capitalism Water Cooler 3-12-20]

These were the experts with decades of experience dealing with precisely the kind of situation we are in today.
Trump did not replace them.
He eliminated the positions.

Snopes: TRUE – The Trump administration fired the U.S. pandemic response team in 2018 to cut costs.
[Snopes]

Rear Adm. Timothy Ziemer abruptly departed from his post leading the global health security team on the National Security Council in May 2018 amid a reorganization of the council by then-National Security Advisor John Bolton, and Ziemer’s team was disbanded. Tom Bossert, whom the Washington Post reported “had called for a comprehensive biodefense strategy against pandemics and biological attacks,” had been fired one month prior.

 

It’s thus true that the Trump administration axed the executive branch team responsible for coordinating a response to a pandemic and did not replace it, eliminating Ziemer’s position and reassigning others, although Bolton was the executive at the top of the National Security Council chain of command at the time.

 

[New York Magazine, via Naked Capitalism 3-13-20]

What we are seeing right now is the collapse of civic authority and public trust at what is only the beginning of a protracted crisis. In the face of an onrushing pandemic, the United States has exhibited a near-total evacuation of responsibility and political leadership — a sociopathic disinterest in performing the basic function of government, which is to protect its citizens.

Things will get worse from here. According to a survey of epidemiologists released yesterday, the coronavirus outbreak probably won’t peak before May….

Trump is, of course, the last man in the world you would want in charge right now. In an extremely illuminating interview with Gabriel Debenedetti published this morning, Obama’s Ebola czar Ron Klain described his response to that threat, which he suggested was a relatively good model for how the U.S. might have responded to this one. That response began with 10,000 public-health workers sent to fight and investigate the disease. This administration has sent none, which means it has been, practically speaking, flying blind about the nature of the coronavirus and the challenges it represents to public-health systems. In fact, it’s worse than that; for all intents and purposes, the administration hasn’t been flying at all, spending the last three months sitting by entirely idle and indifferent, rather than scaling up testing regimes, issuing protocols, and preparing for a major surge of patients by developing contingency plans to expand hospital capacity around the country wherever it became needed.

“The Dismantled State Takes on a Pandemic”
[The New Republic, via Naked Capitalism 3-13-20]

Conservatives won their war on Big Government. Their prize is a pandemic.

Lambert Strether of Naked Capitalism pointed to this amazing passage:

“As a clinician like yourself,” [Robert Redfield, the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention] said in his answer, “I guess I anticipated that the private sector would have engaged and helped develop it for the clinical side.” He finished his response with more bewilderment: “I can tell you, having lived through the last eight weeks, I would have loved the private sector to be fully engaged eight weeks ago.”

Lambert Strether continued: 

The Economics of a Flu Pandemic (Virus)

winged_caduceusReposted from 2009 – obviously, we do now have a pandemic.

While I don’t think the current swine flu outbreak is all that likely to turn into a pandemic, I’ve had some requests to re-post my article on flu pandemic economics.

Overview

When I was approached to write about the economics of a flu pandemic, my first reaction was “What’s there to write about?” Because, in the normal terms that people consider personal economics (such as how to diversify your portfolio, and so on), there isn’t a lot to talk about. Most of the obvious losers (medical insurance companies, hospitals, airlines, freight companies) and so on will either be bailed out by the government afterwards or aren’t quite the obvious losers that they seem. There is, perhaps, an argument for investing in drug companies and medical supply companies, on the assumption of an increase in demand, not so much during the pandemic, but after it. However even that sort of play is dubious, because the reaction to how the system performs in any pandemic situation may not rebound to the benefit of private companies.

But economics isn’t really about the stock market, it’s about how rare assets are allocated. And as such, there’s a fair bit we can talk about when it comes to a pandemic.

First, let’s lay out the basic scenario. I am assuming a serious pandemic, with all non-essential travel shut down for the duration (kiss your vacation goodbye), with both infected individuals and any individuals who have come into contact with them instructed to quarantine themselves, or being forcibly quarantined.

I am also assuming a pandemic large enough to overwhelm the health systems in most countries which get hit. There are not enough beds, not enough ventilators, and most likely not enough anti-virals to go around in most countries. There certainly won’t be enough trained medical personnel.

The situation will be much like that in wartime. Government will concentrate on keeping key infrastructure operating. Power, sewage, water, emergency services, and food distribution. Distribution of most goods through the system will be discontinued, since people can be asymptomatic and still carriers, it will be decided to keep any cross-country travel to a minimum. Most retail outlets will close, either voluntarily or by government fiat. Food will be trucked either into distribution centers or into supermarkets which agree to stay open and will be rationed out exactly as in wartime. As such, a black market will certainly appear.

Preparations

If you think that such a pandemic is likely to occur, then the steps you should take are much the same you would take for any natural disaster. Because the banking system will likely shut down during the crisis (and bank machines will likely not be restocked even if they do not go down due to loss of system personnel) you should have a stock of money at home to allow you to buy whatever you need which is available. If you can arrange to have independent power generation, you should do so. You should have a good supply of canned food and water. Make your estimate of how much you need and double or triple it. Others will not have planned, and you do not want to find yourself not being able to help friends, family, and neighbors. In addition, you will want to have tradeables available for the black market. Money will be a poor second to having goods people want. In this regard, stocking up on some medical items such as surgical masks and OTC medicines will be especially wise. I’m not encouraging profiteering, but you will need something you can trade which people want. Badly.

In terms of personal finances, other than investing your money in survival goods like food, water, candles, kerosene lamps, and stoves and so on (in case of a power out), and taking some money out for use in buying what goods are available, there’s little to do. Make sure you have an up-to-date, written statement of your assets every month, so that if records are lost you can successfully argue with your bank/broker about what situation you were in.

Most stock markets will shut down for the duration of the crisis, either voluntarily or by government fiat. However, some may stay open. The action on those exchanges will be wild, and probably very depressing. Ignore it for the duration. Don’t sell, don’t buy unless you are a trader who knows exactly what you’re doing. Many companies will get bailed out after the pandemic is over, and what the stock price will be a year from the pandemic is impossible to tell.

The most important thing you can do before the actual pandemic starts is make sure your personal relationships with whomever you live with are in good shape, that you have a circle of friends and family you can trust and that you have a relationship with your neighbors and any important people in your neighborhood. Leaving aside personal health factors, one of the most import predictors for survival will be the strength of your social ties to others. You may need help. Almost certainly someone in your family or social circle will need help. Make sure it’s there, by making sure ahead of time that people like you and want to help you and can’t bear the idea of you suffering or dying alone.

During…

The primary economic effect of a pandemic will be the slowing of almost all non-related economic activity to a crawl or even a halt. The primary tool of public health in any pandemic situation will be quarantine and the primary goal will be slowing or halting the spread of the disease, not just within a given community, but from community to community. As such, both international and domestic trade, including trucking, train, and air freight, will take a phenomenal dive. Nothing that is not a necessity will travel. For all intents and purposes the official economy will be driven down to little more than essential services and the shipping of essential goods like food, medicine, and goods necessary to maintain essential services.

Don’t expect to be getting a paycheck during this period unless you work in an essential service. Most companies will either shut down voluntarily, be shut down by government fiat, or will operate with a skeleton staff. And don’t expect to be able to cash your check or get money out of the bank – odds are they’ll shut down and even if the ATMs stay up, they likely won’t be restocked with money.

What there will be is a black market. In situations like this there is always a black market. There’ll be people selling food, water, and medicines (a lot of the medicine will be fake) and medical supplies like masks. If you want or need any of these things, you’ll either pay though the nose or have to have something to barter. In general, I discourage people from getting involved in black markets. But you may not have a choice and if you don’t, then make sure you have something to barter with.

Because public transit will likely be either shut down or operating on a much-reduced schedule, consider how you’re going to travel if you need to. For urban types, a bicycle is good. For suburban types, make sure you have gas, because there will be, almost guaranteed, gas rationing and long lines for gasoline. Rural types are advised to store gasoline or diesel fuel.

After

The long term effects of a pandemic are hard to judge. It really depends on a few things: how many people die; what the demographic profile of those who die is, and; how the public reacts to the disaster.

In a situation with relatively light casualties, say one percent of the population, the world will go on. Everyone will know someone who lost someone, or will have lost someone themselves. But the bottom line, sad as it is, is that it won’t make a huge difference. Demand will drop and thus it won’t have a huge effect on employment one way or the other; it’ll reduce GDP noticeably, but not disastrously, and otherwise, it’ll be business as usual with sadness.

However, if we have heavy casualties, with the worst casualties inflicted on healthy people between the ages of 20 to 40 the effect will be quite noticeable. It will put a lot of pressure on increasing retirement ages, decreasing retirement benefits (as programs like SS are paid for by current workers) and will mean that countries will have to consider encouraging more immigration. There will be a significant demand shock and GDP will take a big enough hit to be noticeable. Because some things can’t be downsized proportional to the loss of population, the employment situation will probably be better than before (assuming it doesn’t throw us into a depression, which it might).

In either the low- or high-end casualty estimates, the government will either bail out or take over a lot of companies, including health insurers, airlines, and freight companies. The worse things are, the less likely it that companies will be bailed out. Government revenue will take a significant hit in these scenarios, but especially in the heavy casualty scenario, and they will not be able to bail out everyone.

But the real question regarding the long-term effect is how the public reacts. If the public and private health systems crack under the strain, and many people die who could have been saved, then the outcry is likely to be something fierce. Everything will be up for grabs – and it’s hard to say if it’ll lead to more public health care, the scalping of politicians, or the weakening of drug patent laws. It could lead to an end of health insurance companies and drug companies as we know them today – or, they could turn the tables and claim it was the public system that failed.

But it’s safe to say that there’ll be less travel, less trade, and more care taken to ensure diseases don’t spread in the future. Get used to being checked every time you cross a border, and don’t be surprised if you see a lot less foreign goods on store shelves.

The real economic fallout will be determined by politics, not economics, per se. The political decisions made will determine the fate of entire industries, and trade and travel for some time to come.

Politics almost always trumps economics.


The results of the work I do, like this article, are free, but food isn’t, so if you value my work, please DONATE or SUBSCRIBE.

Open Thread

As usual, feel free to use the comments to discuss topics unrelated to recent posts.

Coronavirus Bungling Is What We Voted For

Okay, let’s lay it on the line.

Donald Trump is a blithering idiot, and he’s incompetent at the actual mechanics of running a government. This isn’t to deny his other competencies in bullying and running a campaign, but he’s obviously mentally deficient.

He is bungling the Coronavirus response. That’s going to lead to a lot of dead people, including a lot of old people who, forgive me, voted for him.

Meanwhile, there is a Democratic primary going on in which the candidate who is obviously suffering from dementia and doesn’t want universal health care is winning.

So apparently, Democrats also want to be governed by an incompetent, they just weren’t offered one before.

If you elect incompetents, they will do incompetent things–like bungle epidemic responses.

Then we have Britain, where Prime Minister Boris Johnson is bungling the response, including, hilariously, not shutting down Parliament. Apparently, British elites are now so inbred and incompetent that they can no longer even manage the basics, like, “killing the commoners while staying alive ourselves.”

Britain has possibly the lowest number of beds per capita in Europe. When it gets hit hard, people are going to die in droves. Likely millions.

Brits had two chances to vote for Corbyn. If they’d elected him in 2017, he’d have re-staffed the NHS and opened many more beds. Nor is it possible to imagine that he would have bungled the response to the epidemic in this manner.

The British media, according to an academic study, lied about Corbyn over 75 percent of the time. They suggested Labour was anti-semitic, when the evidence showed to be trivial amounts, no greater than under Blair. They actively campaigned against him.

Every “journalist” and producer who did so has blood on their hands, and it’s going to be a lot of blood.

But voters have responsibilities, too. I have sympathy for those who are going to suffer and die, and I’m in the moderate risk group (over 50, bad lungs). But we have been voting for incompetents who have gutted any collective action ability for decades.

I live in Ontario, ruled by Doug Ford. Dougie is arguably more incompetent and slightly more evil than Trump. He is bungling the response. Trudeau, our Prime Minister, who is very pretty and has nice abs, is bungling the response. There were competent alternatives to these people, but those competent alternatives were left-wing (NDP) and wanted to help the poors, and the electorate didn’t want that. (“Oh no! A poor might be helped!”)

Well, now the poors weren’t helped and the old people who voted to not help the poors (because, yes, that’s how these elections all went) are going to die.

I do have sympathy, because I don’t like people suffering, but when people deliberately take action to ensure other people don’t get help, when they deliberately elect incompetents (even ones who are obviously suffering from mental problems like Trump, Bush, and Biden), and then find out that they too will suffer? Well, one’s sympathy has to be somewhat leavened.

Oh, and it’s still a, umm, thing of terrible beauty to see that Britain’s leadership class has so degraded that they are keeping Parliament open so that they can die along with their subjects. Not because they’re noble, but because they are stupid.

You couldn’t make this stuff up. No one would believe this in fiction; that people could be so stupid, short-sighted, mean, and venal–especially against their own self interests.

But here we are.

Meanwhile, I like my readers, so kindly take care of yourself. If you’re in a place early on the curve, and especially if old, take the precautions. Remember, systems will be overwhelmed in many places, and there will not be enough beds or ventilators. This is not a drill. Do what you can to save your life.

Edit: And…the panic buying has hit Toronto, where I live. Went to the local supermarket, and locusts had descended.


The results of the work I do, like this article, are free, but food isn’t, so if you value my work, please DONATE or SUBSCRIBE.

Taking the Coronvirus Seriously

Covid Fatality from Bloomberg

Three weeks ago, Italy had almost no cases of Coronavirus. Today the country is on lockdown. There are so many cases that doctors cannot put ventilators in everyone who needs them, and are having to choose who gets them, leaving many to die who might otherwise live.

Covid-19 has an exponential spread if it is not handled correctly. Donald Trump and the US have chosen to not manage it properly. In fact, in most cases the US has chosen to not even test. We do not know how widespread the Coronavirus is.

Trump is acting like the average American CEO, he is managing the numbers, not the underlying reality.

That may get you killed. Maybe you’re young and healthy, then it may kill your parents, grandparents, or other older people you care about.

You should assume, at this point, that there will be an epidemic in the United States and you should prepare for one. Buy the necessary supplies for staying in place for at least two weeks if you have not already. Include any medications if you can. Get some non-prescription anti-virals if you can (raw garlic and bee propolis are decent), because while conventional medicine is superior, you must assume that there will not be enough ventilators, for example, to go around. Heck, there may not even be even be enough beds.

British readers should take note as well.

A lot of organizations are cancelling meetings, there are planes flying entirely empty, school is being cancelled, and so on. All of these things are good.

Note that the fatality rate soars if the spread of the disease is not slowed, because if there are too many cases all at once, and hospitals are overwhelmed. The chart going around to illustrate this follows.

 

The US isn’t going to have a better curve. So assume that you aren’t going to get good hospital care, and that you might not get hospital care at all.

All of this is, of course, a bad case scenario. But that scenario is happening, right now, in Italy. If you make preparations and you don’t need them, that’s not a problem. If you do need them, you’ll be glad you did.

This virus specializes in older, unhealthy people. But young people are carriers, even if they don’t die. So if you don’t have to, you should probably be avoiding older people for the duration.

Social distancing is not a bad idea. If you can work for home, you probably should. Employers which can have their workers work from home should do that now. Schools should be sending students home, conventions should be cancelled, etc.

In Italy, the government has cancelled mortgage payments. I would suggest that other governments consider the same and do something similar for renters, while also cancelling utility payments, with the government directly compensating utilities. Other similar measures can be imagined.

The American government’s inclination will be to give money to rich people through the Federal Reserve, but it is poor people who need to be convinced they can afford to stay home, and not go to work and keep spreading the disease.

Remember that the virus has a five day average incubation period. You could have it now and feel fine. Further you can have the virus and never get symptoms, but spread it. This is especially likely if you are young and healthy.

So, take this all seriously. It might save your life, or it might save the life of someone you care about.

As for the politics, it all depends. If it’s not too bad, Trump can keep the lid on it. People will die, the media doesn’t really report it, he survives. If it truly breaks out, and people are sharing videos of their grandmothers dying without health care because hospitals are overwhelemed, he’s going to get the blame–quite deservedly so. Of course, most politicians, including Trump, Biden, and Sanders, are old, and are at high risk to get the disease and die. Trump, in particular, is obviously not healthy.

The Coronavirus is not a hoax, it is deadlier than the flu, and the response has been bungled.

Edit: One of the symptoms is coughing blood. An herbalist I respect has suggested Dragon’s Blood (Sangre De Grado) might help with that. I pass this on very tentatively, I’m not a doctor and don’t play one, but I have ordered some for myself. It’s not expensive. None of this is a substitute for hospital care, of course, but hospitals may be overwhelmed.


The results of the work I do, like this article, are free, but food isn’t, so if you value my work, please DONATE or SUBSCRIBE.

Another Set of Primaries Today

We have Idaho primaries (25 delegates), Michigan primaries (147 delegates), Mississippi primaries (41 delegates), Missouri primaries (68), North Dakota caucuses (18 delegates), and Washington primaries (107 delegates).

The polling on this is terrible, it went very south Sunday. Expect bad news tonight.

Fortunately, this is not a big mess of primaries, and there will be a chance to turn it around later, but some luck is going to be required. Perhaps Sanders can take Biden down clearly in the next debate (or, more likely, Biden’s senility will take him down). Perhaps a Biden senile-moment blows up past the media’s ability to filter it. Perhaps something else; obviously no one wants the Coronavirus to decide the primaries or elections, but Trump, Biden, and Sanders are all in the very vulnerable class, and politicians are still exposing themselves to people.

If you’re working to get Bernie elected, I’d suggest you keep working. It’s impossible to know what will happen, but also be prepared for the bad news which is most likely coming.

(Aside: To me it looks like Warren’s repeated attacks on Sanders had the effect of estranging various of her followers from Sanders. She’s not stupid enough not know what she’s doing. So be it.)

Feel free to use the comments to discuss the results as they come in, and so on.

Edit: Corrected the number of delegates Missouri offers.


The results of the work I do, like this article, are free, but food isn’t, so if you value my work, please DONATE or SUBSCRIBE.

Once More on Elizabeth Warren in Her Moment of Truth

Warren Elizabeth

There is another set of primaries tomorrow. Bernie and Biden are neck-and-neck in current total delegates, with Biden taking the lead in polling for tomorrow.

Warren has spent a week not doing anything but complaining about Bernie and going on a comedy show.

Today is the last moment Warren can endorse either Bernie or Biden and look like she means it. If she endorses today she can claim it was for impact on the next set of primaries.

If she doesn’t do it today, she clearly dithered.

The case for her endorsing Sanders is simple. His policies and politics are far closer to hers. So much closer that there is no comparison between Sanders and Biden in this regard.

But more than that, and perhaps worse, is that the bankruptcy bill Biden championed and helped force through is why Warren claims she went into politics. It is her political raison d’etre. It is her origin story as a politician.

If she doesn’t endorse Sanders, not only is she not supporting the politician who wants to do most of what she wants to do, she is failing to oppose the politician who she claims has been her nemesis.

On top of that, she will be forfeiting a leadership position in the left-wing progressive movement, a movement large and powerful enough to challenge the Democratic political machine.

In 2016, she slid on not endorsing anyone, but this time tens of millions of passionate Sanders supporters, many of whom feel they need universal health care to survive, student debt relief not to be poor, and a vigorous climate change plan to have a future, aren’t going to forgive sitting on the sides.

If she sits this one out, then she’s just a Senator again. Plus, she’ll probably be primaried.

I also keep seeing arguments that Warren owes no one anything, and I find that strange. She’s a sitting Senator whom millions of people supported in the primaries. It seems to me, at least, that she owes those people something; that if she believed in her policy platform, if she believed those policies were good for the country, that she owes her supporters an attempt to get something similiar through with Bernie, because Biden isn’t going to do it. Heck, he’s floated Jamie Dimon and Bloomberg’s names as potential cabinet members.

Meanwhile, we’re coming up on another finanical crisis, thanks to the Coronavirus and Russia deciding to crash oil prices at the same time as demand is already slumping. The big banks are going to need another huge bailout–again, Warren’s reason for being in politics.

She won’t fight to have Sanders in charge, so that Wall Street isn’t bailed out while ordinary people aren’t?

All of this is a long-winded way of saying that if Warren doesn’t endorse Bernie, it looks like she has no principles and doesn’t care about her followers. (No, don’t use electability. Sanders polls better against Trump and doesn’t have dementia.)

It makes it appear that she’s primarily concerned with only one person: Elizabeth Warren.

I hope that isn’t the case, but she’s running out of time to prove it isn’t. In fact, if you read this post by email tonight and she hasn’t endorsed him by then, she’s probably too late.

I confess to some anger over this, but I also feel sadness. When a politician who had a chance at greatness proves that they are primarily moved by self-interest, not by the principles they espoused, it is a cause for sorrow. We sneer at politicians precisely because so many of them seem to have no real beliefs, but it is ennobling when we find one of the few who aren’t like that.

I had hoped Warren was among their number, and my anger is genuinely partly moved by sorrow. As I said repeatedly throughout the primary, though I preferred Sanders I would have endorsed Warren if she were the nominee.

And everyone knows that if Sanders and Warren’s positions were reversed, he would have already endorsed.

May Warren prove her that followers were right to trust her, that her origin story was real, and that she stands behind her plans.

(If anyone else is getting bored of “all primary all the time,” yeah, posts on other subjects soonish.)

Edit: I changed the wording from “neck-and-neck” in first paragraph after commenters pointed out I obviously hadn’t read the polling from today and yesterday. Yup, Biden’s pulling ahead substantially, my bad, I had only looked at current delegate totals. Guess Americans really do hate the ideas of universal health care, their children not being debt slaves, and not dying like flies to climate change.


The results of the work I do, like this article, are free, but food isn’t, so if you value my work, please DONATE or SUBSCRIBE.

Week-end Wrap – Political Economy – March 8, 2020

by Tony Wikrent
Economics Action Group, North Carolina Democratic Party Progressive Caucus

Strategic Political Economy

Lessons for the Green New Deal from the Economic Mobilization for World War Two (PDF deck) [Josh Mason, via Naked Capitalism 3-2-20]

(Based on forthcoming Roosevelt Institute paper coauthored with Andrew Bossie)

Why so much direct public investment?

  • Private sector unwilling/unable to bear risk, especially in newer industries

Lessons for Green New Deal

  1. Decarbonization may call for large direct investment by public sector as opposed to shifting private investment via prices/subsidies
  1. Public role largest in new industries/technologies
  1. Public role not just to provide resources, but to solve coordination problems and to bear risk

Third lesson: Full employment is powerful force for redistribution

  • 1940s saw the largest compression of incomes in US history as in most advanced countries
  • Lowest paid groups (African Americans, agricultural workers) gained most
  • Very little direct redistribution – all about labor market

Summary – Three lessons from wartime mobilization:

  1. Rapid economic transitions require larger role for direct public investment
  1. Output, employment are more elastic than conventional estimates of potential assume
  1. Full employment is powerful force for income compression, even without explicit redistribution

Predatory Finance

Alexander Hamilton’s Creations Are in Uncharted Territory: The slide below 1% suggests the Fed has lost control and has troubling implications for the long-term economic outlook.
John Authers, March 4, 2020 [Bloomburg, via The Big Picture 3-5-20]

…what happened on Super Tuesday in the bond market was truly historic. The G-7’s finance ministers and central bankers talked in the morning, produced a statement that the market found disappointing, and then the Federal Reserve announced an emergency interest rate cut…. An emergency cut is intended to deal with extreme financial conditions….

The long-term outlook is now of drawn-out deflationary stagnation. We can see this from another amazing development — the drop in the 30-year yield to a negative level in real terms. In other words, its yield is less than the average inflation rate that can be derived from the inflation-linked bond market. Nothing like this has ever happened before:

Demand for Fed’s Repo Loans Surges Past $100 Billion a Day as 10-Year Treasury Hits Lowest Rate in 149 Years

Pam Martens and Russ Martens, March 5, 2020 [Wall Street On Parade]

Page 3 of 4

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén