Nuremburg
Well, not all the time, but it is one of the necessary preconditions.
More broadly, when the old regime has failed (lost a war, bungled the economy), then people are willing to try something else. This “something else” may mean electing someone like FDR. It may be allowing someone like Stalin or Hitler to rise to power. It may be opting to try Communism. It may be electing someone as mild as Corbyn.
Or it may take the form of someone like Trump or Cruz.
Unhappiness occurs during decline.
Decline. The US economy has been lousy for most people for decades. Since somewhere between 1968 and 1980. 1968 was the peak of wages for working class white males, for example. You are surprised they are unhappy? They have been in decline for almost 40 years.
(I am fundraising to determine how much I’ll write this year. If you value my writing, and want more of it, please consider donating.)
Women’s wages were rising through much of the period. They might be less than men’s, but they were rising.
Happiness is predicated on doing better than in the past. It doesn’t have to better by much, it just has to be better.
Since 2008, the economy, for the majority of the population (over 80 percent, over 90 percent by some calculations), has been bad. They have lost income. Their houses are worth less. They are less likely to be employed, much less have that lesser job.
They are ripe for fascism.
They are ripe for any sort of radical change offered by anyone who doesn’t parse; doesn’t feel, like one of the current set of elites. Trump does not, Cruz does not, Sanders does not. In Britain, where the situation is similar, Corbyn does not.
This is the beginning of the time of changes. Some countries will choose well, others will not, but the issues of how and by whom countries are run is in play–in a way it has not been in my lifetime.